| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
beartn
Joined: 11 Mar 2005 Posts: 103
|
Posted: Mon Mar 21, 2005 11:05 am Post subject: Draft |
|
|
|
I have been seeing a trade where chicago sends #4 to san diego for #12 and #28, with most having the bears take cadilac willams 12, roody white wr(2 and alex smith te rd2, interesting |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
GRRLacher 


 Joined: 07 Mar 2005 Posts: 20640 Location: Maryland
|
Posted: Mon Mar 21, 2005 11:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| I can't say that I would be totally opposed to that move... where did you see this beartn?? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
beartn
Joined: 11 Mar 2005 Posts: 103
|
Posted: Mon Mar 21, 2005 11:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| It's all over the mock drafts on this board, so I assuming someone copied it from somewhere to fill out there own drafts, not sure of the original |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jack 
Joined: 05 Mar 2005 Posts: 4173
|
Posted: Mon Mar 21, 2005 1:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I don't see Williams falling to the 12th pick. Tampa craves him, and Minnesota will take a WR. That leaves both of the top 2 WRs gone by the 7th pick, and I dont feel good about Williamson. He might have been good at the combine, but as we all know, the combine doesnt tell the whole story. Check his last yr college stats, he only had like 45 receptions for 800 yds and 7 TDs, not what I would call a "dominating" preformance to warrant him a 1st round selection. Take Williams w/the #4 pick, trade down in the 2nd round to grab another pick. _________________
"You may have the greatest bunch of individual stars in the world, but if they don’t play together, the club won’t be worth a dime."--Babe Ruth |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Where'sRaymont? 
Joined: 20 Mar 2005 Posts: 4856
|
Posted: Mon Mar 21, 2005 1:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| I agree with Jack about trading down in the 2nd. Mike Williams or DJ with the fourth |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|