| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| HALL OR CHANDLER |
| hall |
|
50% |
[ 4 ] |
| chandler |
|
50% |
[ 4 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 8 |
|
| Author |
Message |
goskins
Joined: 22 Jan 2005
Posts: 120
|
 Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2005 11:05 am Post subject: KICKER |
 |
|
|
who do you think is better for the skins
think about
cap
age
injury
skill
i say chandler because he played extreamly well for us and hes younger, cheeper, and isnt injurd alot
_________________
GO SKINS |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sootedpair
Joined: 20 Feb 2005
Posts: 2188
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2005 11:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| I don't know how much we'd pay Chandler if we signed him to a long term contract, but I'm sure it would be less than Hall. They're FG accuracy is practically the same, but I think Hall probably has a little better range. Hall is better on the kickoffs too, but based on the salary and the injury problems I'd side with Chandler. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
