RedandGold's 3rd rounder Yes I am better then Kiper

lucasm39 · Joined: 13 Apr 2006 Posts: 204 Location: Rancho Cordova, CA

Enjoyed your draft. I'm expecting Young to drop, and despite all the talk, LenDale White to go earlier.

MPL

PlayerCoach · Joined: 13 Apr 2006 Posts: 33

You've got Lendale White too high. He has not had a good workout, and won't. He's overweight, and had a nice career running behind an All-American OL. A big back, but he wasn't just running over guys like Bettis and he can't make anyone miss. He's a good back, not a great one and is not worthy of a #1 pick.
_________________
Film study is what counts.

#1CARDSFAN · Joined: 18 Jan 2006 Posts: 23284

mc cown was improving

he is a piece of crap i am glad he is gone

anyone who watched him play knows he will never win in zona

Username · Joined: 17 Jan 2006 Posts: 262 Location: Madison, WI

This is an amazing Packers' draft, though not particularly realistic. Mario and Tye Hill would be incredible in the first two rounds. In the third however, I'd rather have a different guard (or center); one that fits our newly installed zone blocking scheme. (Setterstrom or Eslinger or someone with some ZBS experience) Nice job overall though...

itstdt · Joined: 19 May 2005 Posts: 114

As a niner fan, I'd like to see Vernon Davis, Darrell Bing, Nicholson, Martin Nance

FiLLiE pHaNaTiC · Joined: 10 Apr 2006 Posts: 1888 Location: New Jersey

Love the first pick, like the second, but the third is not of a position of first day need. Go o-line with that pick.
_________________
Eagles won't draft in 1st:
DE- Have Kearse, Trent Cole, and now Darren Howard
WR- Have Reggie Brown, Pinkston, Greg Lewis, and now Jabar Gaffney
RB- Have Westbrook, Ryan Moats, Reno Mahe, and Bruce Perry
OT- Have Runyan, Thomas, and Todd Herremans

I completely agree with everything said here.
_________________

The Gnat · Joined: 23 Feb 2005 Posts: 34112 Location: Minneapolis

I would prefer Davin Joseph in the second round instead of Croyle. Then in the third we wouldn't need to get a C (we still have other needs), but a CB or a QB would make good sense there.
_________________
Gnat's Movie Reviews

9erNation · Joined: 29 Dec 2005 Posts: 199 Location: Da Bay

Great Picks
_________________

Success is an SF QB Tradition~ Montana, Young, Smith*
"Imposible is Nothing" -Muhammad Ali

John · Joined: 30 Mar 2006 Posts: 30 Location: Sioux City, Ia

If Dallas got this Draft I would whistle from then to Training camp. If one of the Guards fell a little further, there is a little more need for one of those than a tackle right now. But all in all....GREAT! Laughing

_________________
THE QUEST FOR "6" CONTINUES....

cjfollett · Joined: 23 Mar 2006 Posts: 340

Kiper says Moss to the Steelers @32 too, but you're both wrong. The Steelers would take pretty much anyone from #33 to #44 in your mock before they'd take Moss. Plax's replacement was Heath Miller. ARE's replacement is a combination of Wilson and Washington.

Bullocks in the 2nd round is a good pick, but if Whitner is there @ 32 (he won't be) WR will be the pick in the 2nd, probably Stovall. Mangold is still an option for the Steelers as well @ 32, so Bullocks could be 64, then 96 would most likely be WR.

Just say no to Moss.

One4theThumb · Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2006 4:06 pm Post subject:

No way Pittsburgh pases up Donte Whitner

jjb04f · Joined: 23 Dec 2005 Posts: 849 Location: Buffalo, NY

PackAttack785 · Joined: 09 Jan 2006 Posts: 5971 Location: Appleton, WI

Packers draft gets a F.

Mario pick is good but anyone is that high.

Hill is un-neaded- the "Jim Bates" defense needs big and physical corners and the Pack already has Carrol to cover the speadsters.

Lutui is too big and slow to be utalized in the Packer's Zone Blocking system.

If the Pack takes Mario they will need to adress LB asap.

jagz4life · Joined: 01 Mar 2005 Posts: 36212

Ok Jags draft... could be better

holt_bruce81 · Joined: 23 Oct 2005 Posts: 18438 Location: St. Louis

pretty sweet rams draft