Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

Thoughts of day 2.
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Green Bay Packers
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
longjohn68


Joined: 11 Jan 2014
Posts: 32
Location: De Pere, Wisconsin
PostPosted: Fri Apr 28, 2017 11:49 pm    Post subject: Thoughts of day 2. Reply with quote

And go
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ragnarok


Joined: 17 Oct 2016
Posts: 890
Location: Washington, DC
PostPosted: Fri Apr 28, 2017 11:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Really like the King pick. He, Randall, and Rollins can be a very good top 3.

And Johnson is a more athletic version of Hyde. Can fill that same role more efficiently.

Not a fan of Adams. He's lazy.
_________________
Come join BDL!

Seriously, we're awesome. We all may or may not have mild-at-best psychological issues, but we are damn fun.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gopackgonerd


Joined: 04 May 2013
Posts: 1282
PostPosted: Fri Apr 28, 2017 11:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'd say it's a success, adding 2 athletic big playmaking DBs to a bad secondary and depth on the D-Line is pretty good, if we draft a OLB/RB tomorrow this will be a very good draft for us.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
packerjmf


Joined: 19 Jan 2006
Posts: 3466
Location: The Yoop
PostPosted: Fri Apr 28, 2017 11:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ragnarok wrote:
Really like the King pick. He, Randall, and Rollins can be a very good top 3.

And Johnson is a more athletic version of Hyde. Can fill that same role more efficiently.

Not a fan of Adams. He's lazy.

https://getyarn.io/yarn-clip/a94a24b2-7b3f-4f2d-ab3c-2f202254c359
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
HorizontoZenith


Joined: 03 Mar 2016
Posts: 4994
PostPosted: Fri Apr 28, 2017 11:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Great, now every time Adams doesn't make a play it's because he's lazy and Thompson drafts lazy players. Can't wait for Montrell Edems to be a thing.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ragnarok


Joined: 17 Oct 2016
Posts: 890
Location: Washington, DC
PostPosted: Fri Apr 28, 2017 11:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

packerjmf wrote:
Ragnarok wrote:
Really like the King pick. He, Randall, and Rollins can be a very good top 3.

And Johnson is a more athletic version of Hyde. Can fill that same role more efficiently.

Not a fan of Adams. He's lazy.

https://getyarn.io/yarn-clip/a94a24b2-7b3f-4f2d-ab3c-2f202254c359


I have no clue what you just linked.
_________________
Come join BDL!

Seriously, we're awesome. We all may or may not have mild-at-best psychological issues, but we are damn fun.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
packfanfb


Joined: 28 Apr 2008
Posts: 1668
PostPosted: Fri Apr 28, 2017 11:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

King and Jones were good value and they add speed to our defense which was sorely needed. Can't complain about either of those picks.

Can't really comment about Adams because I don't know much about him. Never a bad idea to add d-line depth. TT doesn't have a great track record drafting d-linemen but maybe Adams will be more Daniels and less Harrell, Worthy, Thornton.

Pick 108 I want either Carl Lawson or Vince Biegel.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PossibleCabbage


Joined: 25 Apr 2011
Posts: 4798
PostPosted: Fri Apr 28, 2017 11:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

People are going to be upset since we didn't get a running back, but I'm honestly not sure if there are that many RBs we'd start over Montgomery in this draft to begin with- McCaffrey and Mixon, sure... but not a lot of others.

I think honestly the quality of this RB class is vastly overstated. It's more "there are lots of guys" than "there's a lot of talent."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Packerraymond


Moderator
Joined: 31 Mar 2005
Posts: 19270
Location: Oconomowoc, WI
PostPosted: Fri Apr 28, 2017 11:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

We got my #19, 39 and 60th ranked players tonight.

Draft Carl Lawson at 108 and this will be my favorite Ted draft ever.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
packfanfb


Joined: 28 Apr 2008
Posts: 1668
PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 12:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

PossibleCabbage wrote:
People are going to be upset since we didn't get a running back, but I'm honestly not sure if there are that many RBs we'd start over Montgomery in this draft to begin with- McCaffrey and Mixon, sure... but not a lot of others.

I think honestly the quality of this RB class is vastly overstated. It's more "there are lots of guys" than "there's a lot of talent."


At this point there isnt a RB left that interests me. I'm all in on the idea of signing Charles and adding a few UDFAs to compete with Michael for No. 3/4.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gopackgonerd


Joined: 04 May 2013
Posts: 1282
PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 12:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

PossibleCabbage wrote:
People are going to be upset since we didn't get a running back, but I'm honestly not sure if there are that many RBs we'd start over Montgomery in this draft to begin with- McCaffrey and Mixon, sure... but not a lot of others.

I think honestly the quality of this RB class is vastly overstated. It's more "there are lots of guys" than "there's a lot of talent."
I think we can live with Monty and Micheal and a late round pick, think people are scared that Monty can't be a true starter for us.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
NormSizedMidget


Joined: 28 Mar 2011
Posts: 17890
PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 12:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Packerraymond wrote:
We got my #19, 39 and 60th ranked players tonight.

Draft Carl Lawson at 108 and this will be my favorite Ted draft ever.


Where you got Carl ray?

I thought he was a solid second
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
bkobow05


Joined: 16 Dec 2005
Posts: 74304
Location: Milwaukee, WI
PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 12:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Packerraymond wrote:
We got my #19, 39 and 60th ranked players tonight.

Draft Carl Lawson at 108 and this will be my favorite Ted draft ever.
Does Lawson fit what we like? I know the value is there but is he truly a fit and someone we actually have on our board?
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NormSizedMidget


Joined: 28 Mar 2011
Posts: 17890
PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 12:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

HorizontoZenith wrote:
Great, now every time Adams doesn't make a play it's because he's lazy and Thompson drafts lazy players. Can't wait for Montrell Edems to be a thing.


I was gonna past the name thing earlier hahaha.

Gmta
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
PackyAttacky


Joined: 12 Mar 2017
Posts: 206
PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 12:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Packerraymond wrote:
We got my #19, 39 and 60th ranked players tonight.

Draft Carl Lawson at 108 and this will be my favorite Ted draft ever.


Holy crap!! Shocked Good stuff.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Green Bay Packers All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Page 1 of 6

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group