Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

2017 NFL Draft Discussion [2nd-3rd Rounds] [No Spoilers!]
Goto page 1, 2, 3 ... 40, 41, 42  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Green Bay Packers
View previous topic :: View next topic  

Who do we end up with after rounds 2-3?
Kevin King
30%
 30%  [ 12 ]
Joe Mixon
35%
 35%  [ 14 ]
Chidobe Awuzie
7%
 7%  [ 3 ]
Ahkello Witherspoon
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
Jordan Willis
5%
 5%  [ 2 ]
Marcus Williams
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
Cam Robinson
2%
 2%  [ 1 ]
Obi Melifonwu
2%
 2%  [ 1 ]
Alvin Kamara
5%
 5%  [ 2 ]
D'Onta Foreman
5%
 5%  [ 2 ]
Quincy Wilson
2%
 2%  [ 1 ]
Forrest Lamp
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
Justin Evans
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
DeShone Kizer
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
Fabian Moreau
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
Carl Lawson
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
Dan Feeney/Ethan Pocic
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
Sidney Jones
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
Tarell Basham/Tyus Bowser/Derek Rivers
5%
 5%  [ 2 ]
Dion Dawkins
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
Total Votes : 40

Author Message
CentralFC


Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 11629
PostPosted: Fri Apr 28, 2017 12:12 pm    Post subject: 2017 NFL Draft Discussion [2nd-3rd Rounds] [No Spoilers!] Reply with quote

Post day 2 thoughts, rumors, and analysis here.

- Think New York, LAC, and Jacksonville are potential trade down destinations. But we'll have to give up a guy we like to Seattle, who picks right behind us at 2.34 (I presume)

- Do we end up with two or three picks on day 2?


2 33 Green Bay Packers via Cleveland Browns
2 34 Seattle Seahawks via San Francisco 49ers
2 35 Jacksonville Jaguars -
2 36 Chicago Bears -
2 37 Los Angeles Rams -
2 38 Los Angeles Chargers -
2 39 New York Jets -
2 40 Carolina Panthers -
2 41 Cincinnati Bengals -
2 42 New Orleans Saints -
2 43 Philadelphia Eagles -
2 44 Buffalo Bills -
2 45 Arizona Cardinals -
2 46 Indianapolis Colts -
2 47 Baltimore Ravens -
2 48 Minnesota Vikings -
2 49 Washington -
2 50 Tampa Bay Buccaneers -
2 51 Denver Broncos -
2 52 Cleveland Browns via Tennessee Titans
2 53 Detroit Lions -
2 54 Miami Dolphins -
2 55 New York Giants -
2 56 Oakland Raiders -
2 57 Houston Texans -
2 58 Seattle Seahawks -
2 59 Kansas City Chiefs -
2 60 Dallas Cowboys -
2 61 Green Bay Packers -
2 62 Pittsburgh Steelers -
2 63 Atlanta Falcons -
2 64 Carolina Panthers via New England Patriots
3 65 Cleveland Browns -
3 66 San Francisco 49ers -
3 67 San Francisco 49ers via Chicago Bears
3 68 Jacksonville Jaguars -
3 69 Los Angeles Rams -
3 70 New York Jets -
3 71 Los Angeles Chargers -
3 72 New England Patriots via Carolina Panthers
3 73 Cincinnati Bengals -
3 74 Baltimore Ravens via Philadelphia Eagles
3 75 Buffalo Bills -
3 76 New Orleans Saints -
3 77 Arizona Cardinals -
3 78 Baltimore Ravens -
3 79 Minnesota Vikings -
3 80 Indianapolis Colts -
3 81 Washington -
3 82 Denver Broncos -
3 83 Tennessee Titans -
3 84 Tampa Bay Buccaneers -
3 85 Detroit Lions -
3 86 Minnesota Vikings via Miami Dolphins
3 87 New York Giants -
3 88 Oakland Raiders -
3 89 Houston Texans -
3 90 Seattle Seahawks -
3 91 Buffalo Bills via Kansas City Chiefs
3 92 Dallas Cowboys -
3 93 Green Bay Packers -
3 94 Pittsburgh Steelers -
3 95 Seattle Seahawks via Atlanta Falcons
3 96 New England Patriots -
3 97 Miami Dolphins -
3 98 Carolina Panthers -
3 99 Philadelphia Eagles via Baltimore Ravens
3 100 Tennessee Titans via Los Angeles Rams
3 101 Denver Broncos -
3 102 Seattle Seahawks -
3 103 New Orleans Saints via Cleveland Browns through New England Patriots
3 104 Kansas City Chiefs -
3 105 Pittsburgh Steelers -
3 106 Seattle Seahawks -
3 107 New York Jets -
_________________
packerjmf wrote:
GWH87 wrote:
Somebody take the off season shovel out of Ted's hands & bury him in his own hole.

How can he dig a hole if he's too busy sitting on his hands?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PossibleCabbage


Joined: 25 Apr 2011
Posts: 4791
PostPosted: Fri Apr 28, 2017 12:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think if the rumors are true, and TT does indeed draft Kizer, expect a Hundley trade before the round is over.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
HorizontoZenith


Joined: 03 Mar 2016
Posts: 4690
PostPosted: Fri Apr 28, 2017 12:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If we take Kizer and we don't trade Hundley for the very next pick, I riot. I'm okay with a trade down, I'm okay with trading this pick for a first round pick next year, I'm okay with anything as long as we get two defensive players in the second/third rounds.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
blankman0021


Joined: 02 May 2007
Posts: 2737
Location: MKE
PostPosted: Fri Apr 28, 2017 12:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Packers, Seahawks, and Panthers as only teams with 2 second round picks?
_________________
The Doctor wrote:
ALLONS-Y, ALONSO!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
blankman0021


Joined: 02 May 2007
Posts: 2737
Location: MKE
PostPosted: Fri Apr 28, 2017 12:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

HorizontoZenith wrote:
If we take Kizer and we don't trade Hundley for the very next pick, I riot. I'm okay with a trade down, I'm okay with trading this pick for a first round pick next year, I'm okay with anything as long as we get two defensive players in the second/third rounds.


Considering the next pick is Seattle, doubt that they'd pick up Hundley. JAX would be a possibility but I doubt anybody has Hundley over Kizer on their offseason want-list.
_________________
The Doctor wrote:
ALLONS-Y, ALONSO!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
deltarich87


Joined: 29 Dec 2014
Posts: 6005
Location: Bay Area
PostPosted: Fri Apr 28, 2017 12:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Cards could also be a potential trade partner if they're looking at Kizer
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
HorizontoZenith


Joined: 03 Mar 2016
Posts: 4690
PostPosted: Fri Apr 28, 2017 12:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

blankman0021 wrote:
HorizontoZenith wrote:
If we take Kizer and we don't trade Hundley for the very next pick, I riot. I'm okay with a trade down, I'm okay with trading this pick for a first round pick next year, I'm okay with anything as long as we get two defensive players in the second/third rounds.


Considering the next pick is Seattle, doubt that they'd pick up Hundley. JAX would be a possibility but I doubt anybody has Hundley over Kizer on their offseason want-list.

Then let's just not take Kizer, trade Hundley for a second round pick anyway, draft three defensive players in the second round, draft a QB in the third round, draft skill position offensive players with our two fourth round picks, win the Super Bowl, trade Aaron Rodgers for the worst team's best player plus their next two first round picks, draft our next franchise QB, build our defense while our QB blossoms into the next GOAT over his first two years and win 7 Super Bowls in a row with the next QB and call it a decade.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RCobb18


Joined: 04 Dec 2012
Posts: 786
Location: Washington
PostPosted: Fri Apr 28, 2017 12:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

We are not going to take Kizer. Just drumming up trade interest.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ketchup


Joined: 13 May 2009
Posts: 17954
Location: Milwaukee, WI
PostPosted: Fri Apr 28, 2017 1:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

RCobb18 wrote:
We are not going to take Kizer. Just drumming up trade interest.
We have a talented back up with high upside. Absolutely no reason to draft another one. This idea that Ted is actually going to draft a QB this high is just stupid. And if it does end up happening, Ted should resign on the spot because he's lost his damn mind.
_________________

El ramster on the custom sig!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
packfanfb


Joined: 28 Apr 2008
Posts: 1668
PostPosted: Fri Apr 28, 2017 1:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ketchup wrote:
RCobb18 wrote:
We are not going to take Kizer. Just drumming up trade interest.
We have a talented back up with high upside. Absolutely no reason to draft another one. This idea that Ted is actually going to draft a QB this high is just stupid. And if it does end up happening, Ted should resign on the spot because he's lost his damn mind.
Applause
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
GreenGold


Joined: 24 Nov 2007
Posts: 104
PostPosted: Fri Apr 28, 2017 1:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ted learned his lesson with Brian Brohm.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gopackgonerd


Joined: 04 May 2013
Posts: 1281
PostPosted: Fri Apr 28, 2017 1:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I would be so confused if they took a QB here... basically a waste of a high draft pick. If they do they really wanna outstupid the bears in this draft Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
mxr124


Joined: 30 Dec 2009
Posts: 1184
Location: Dubuque, Ia.
PostPosted: Fri Apr 28, 2017 2:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ketchup wrote:
RCobb18 wrote:
We are not going to take Kizer. Just drumming up trade interest.
We have a talented back up with high upside. Absolutely no reason to draft another one. This idea that Ted is actually going to draft a QB this high is just stupid. And if it does end up happening, Ted should resign on the spot because he's lost his damn mind.


Only way I'd be on board with picking Kizer at 33 is if we could get a 3rd for Hundley tonight (which isn't happening).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SE500


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 931
Location: WISCONSIN
PostPosted: Fri Apr 28, 2017 2:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

To trade Hundley now is to sell on the low. If we trade hi, it will be after camp for a 2018 pick. Then we'd get plus value...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Csraverage


Joined: 30 Jan 2006
Posts: 514
PostPosted: Fri Apr 28, 2017 2:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'd be all for a trade back with the JETS in some regard. Swap our #33 with #39 and add an additional pick of theirs. Not too far of a fall, so we'd still get quality while adding another pick.

I know they were looking into QBs all off-season.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Green Bay Packers All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3 ... 40, 41, 42  Next
Page 1 of 42

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group