| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Louis Friend
Joined: 07 Apr 2010
Posts: 11066
Location: Detroit, Michigan
|
 Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 10:01 am Post subject: 2017 NFL Draft Day Thread |
 |
|
|
The thread for everything going on with every team today.
Lots of rumors going around.
I think the Browns do the right thing, keep #1 and take Miles Garrett.
_________________
Sig by El Ramster |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ManeLine
Joined: 22 Jul 2011
Posts: 5445
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 10:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Mayock has us taking Corey Davis. How would you guys react to that pick?
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Louis Friend
Joined: 07 Apr 2010
Posts: 11066
Location: Detroit, Michigan
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 10:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| ManeLine wrote: | | Mayock has us taking Corey Davis. How would you guys react to that pick? |
I just saw that in the draft forum, he is out of his damn mind.
_________________
Sig by El Ramster |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jameson23
Joined: 17 Jan 2006
Posts: 644
Location: Detroit, Michigan
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 10:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Out of his mind? How do you figure?
Year after year, teams pass up on talented playmakers in favor of players who may fill needs. Those are the players who are most likely to be reaches/busts. The best teams pick BPA and load up on game changers, regardless of their perceived needs. I am all for drafting a kid who could turn out to be the best WR of this draft. Anyone trying to argue that we are not in need of offensive playmakers should revisit our game film from last year. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Rockcity
Joined: 06 Jan 2013
Posts: 2155
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 10:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| jameson23 wrote: | Out of his mind? How do you figure?
Year after year, teams pass up on talented playmakers in favor of players who may fill needs. Those are the players who are most likely to be reaches/busts. The best teams pick BPA and load up on game changers, regardless of their perceived needs. I am all for drafting a kid who could turn out to be the best WR of this draft. Anyone trying to argue that we are not in need of offensive playmakers should revisit our game film from last year. |
well said. Bpa baby. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LionsFTW
Joined: 25 Jan 2010
Posts: 20796
Location: N. Korea
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 10:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| jameson23 wrote: | Out of his mind? How do you figure?
Year after year, teams pass up on talented playmakers in favor of players who may fill needs. Those are the players who are most likely to be reaches/busts. The best teams pick BPA and load up on game changers, regardless of their perceived needs. I am all for drafting a kid who could turn out to be the best WR of this draft. Anyone trying to argue that we are not in need of offensive playmakers should revisit our game film from last year. |
I disagree that the best teams pick BPA. I think the best teams pick BPA out of the players that make sense.
_________________
| thelawoffices wrote: | | theuntouchable wrote: | | What's a matter TLO? Cat got your tongue? |
I have mono you [inappropriate/removed] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jameson23
Joined: 17 Jan 2006
Posts: 644
Location: Detroit, Michigan
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 10:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| LionsFTW wrote: | | jameson23 wrote: | Out of his mind? How do you figure?
Year after year, teams pass up on talented playmakers in favor of players who may fill needs. Those are the players who are most likely to be reaches/busts. The best teams pick BPA and load up on game changers, regardless of their perceived needs. I am all for drafting a kid who could turn out to be the best WR of this draft. Anyone trying to argue that we are not in need of offensive playmakers should revisit our game film from last year. |
I disagree that the best teams pick BPA. I think the best teams pick BPA out of the players that make sense. |
Are you suggesting that offensive playmakers are not players that make sense for the Lions? If so, that is something that I can not agree with. Sure, we need defensive help at a few positions (LB, DL, CB), but if the BPA on our board is a WR, I do not see them passing on him just based on defensive needs. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sllim Pickens
Joined: 02 Jan 2007
Posts: 20788
Location: Middle of the Mitten
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 10:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| LionsFTW wrote: | | jameson23 wrote: | Out of his mind? How do you figure?
Year after year, teams pass up on talented playmakers in favor of players who may fill needs. Those are the players who are most likely to be reaches/busts. The best teams pick BPA and load up on game changers, regardless of their perceived needs. I am all for drafting a kid who could turn out to be the best WR of this draft. Anyone trying to argue that we are not in need of offensive playmakers should revisit our game film from last year. |
I disagree that the best teams pick BPA. I think the best teams pick BPA out of the players that make sense. |
I agree for the most part. I think if you have a WR rated a 90 and a LB an 89 both available and you need a LB, you take the LB. If there is a WR that's a 97 and a LB that's an 89 both available, you take the WR. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
detfan782004
Joined: 01 Apr 2005
Posts: 57754
Location: Montana
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 10:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Ready for the annual Cleveland laugher picks
Can't believe they are gonna take Trubisky as rumored at 1
_________________
AAL- Abdullah
Tigers suck. Thanks DD for never getting bull pen |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sllim Pickens
Joined: 02 Jan 2007
Posts: 20788
Location: Middle of the Mitten
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 10:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| jameson23 wrote: | | LionsFTW wrote: | | jameson23 wrote: | Out of his mind? How do you figure?
Year after year, teams pass up on talented playmakers in favor of players who may fill needs. Those are the players who are most likely to be reaches/busts. The best teams pick BPA and load up on game changers, regardless of their perceived needs. I am all for drafting a kid who could turn out to be the best WR of this draft. Anyone trying to argue that we are not in need of offensive playmakers should revisit our game film from last year. |
I disagree that the best teams pick BPA. I think the best teams pick BPA out of the players that make sense. |
Are you suggesting that offensive playmakers are not players that make sense for the Lions? If so, that is something that I can not agree with. Sure, we need defensive help at a few positions (LB, DL, CB), but if the BPA on our board is a WR, I do not see them passing on him just based on defensive needs. |
I see them passing on him because I don't think he is an elite talent. I think he is very good but not good enough to pass up a top end need. Offensive playmakers are a need, but way down the list of needs unless an elite talent drops to us. I don't want to touch RB in the first couple rounds but if Fournette falls to us you have to take him. Other than that give me the best DE/LB because that 15-30 range of guys on my board are all pretty similar. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
FootballPhreak
Joined: 09 Oct 2007
Posts: 36534
Location: Clio, MI
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 10:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Sllim Pickens wrote: | | LionsFTW wrote: | | jameson23 wrote: | Out of his mind? How do you figure?
Year after year, teams pass up on talented playmakers in favor of players who may fill needs. Those are the players who are most likely to be reaches/busts. The best teams pick BPA and load up on game changers, regardless of their perceived needs. I am all for drafting a kid who could turn out to be the best WR of this draft. Anyone trying to argue that we are not in need of offensive playmakers should revisit our game film from last year. |
I disagree that the best teams pick BPA. I think the best teams pick BPA out of the players that make sense. |
I agree for the most part. I think if you have a WR rated a 90 and a LB an 89 both available and you need a LB, you take the LB. If there is a WR that's a 97 and a LB that's an 89 both available, you take the WR. |
I'm down, but I am not sure where my leash is. What if the LB is an 88? 87?
I think mine would be relatively short
_________________
| Draft_FanAddict wrote: | | If that doesn't concern you, I don't know what would...a missing head? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Rockcity
Joined: 06 Jan 2013
Posts: 2155
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 10:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Q. Is taco Charlton close to Corey davis? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jameson23
Joined: 17 Jan 2006
Posts: 644
Location: Detroit, Michigan
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 11:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Rockcity wrote: | | Q. Is taco Charlton close to Corey davis? |
For what its worth, I have a 2nd round grade on Charlton and a top-15 grade on Davis. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
FootballPhreak
Joined: 09 Oct 2007
Posts: 36534
Location: Clio, MI
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 11:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Rockcity wrote: | | Q. Is taco Charlton close to Corey davis? |
I would put them about a half round apart and I take my BPA - Davis
_________________
| Draft_FanAddict wrote: | | If that doesn't concern you, I don't know what would...a missing head? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Rockcity
Joined: 06 Jan 2013
Posts: 2155
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 11:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| jameson23 wrote: | | Rockcity wrote: | | Q. Is taco Charlton close to Corey davis? |
For what its worth, I have a 2nd round grade on Charlton and a top-15 grade on Davis. |
same |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
