Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

< 24 Hours Away | 64-Pick Mock
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> 2017 NFL Mock Draft
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
CentralFC


Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 11746
PostPosted: Wed Apr 26, 2017 10:47 pm    Post subject: < 24 Hours Away | 64-Pick Mock Reply with quote









_________________
packerjmf wrote:
GWH87 wrote:
Somebody take the off season shovel out of Ted's hands & bury him in his own hole.

How can he dig a hole if he's too busy sitting on his hands?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jets913


Joined: 29 Apr 2011
Posts: 602
Location: Long Island, NY
PostPosted: Wed Apr 26, 2017 10:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

WORST POSSIBLE MOVE FOR THE JETS! we need as many picks as possible and I wouldn't even want Trubisky at 6. much rather trade down and let some one else come up to take a bust
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Zithers


Joined: 15 Aug 2010
Posts: 3255
PostPosted: Wed Apr 26, 2017 10:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Panthers ain't touching Cook with his off field concerns. We stay away from that stuff after Greg Hardy.

Also we would without a doubt take Jamal Adams if he were there at 8.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Crickett


Joined: 27 Nov 2004
Posts: 4854
PostPosted: Wed Apr 26, 2017 10:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jets913 wrote:
WORST POSSIBLE MOVE FOR THE JETS! we need as many picks as possible and I wouldn't even want Trubisky at 6. much rather trade down and let some one else come up to take a bust


Doesn't mean it won't happen.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bananabucket


Joined: 29 Dec 2013
Posts: 1684
PostPosted: Wed Apr 26, 2017 11:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Our safeties are actually decent but Hooker would be a no brainer there, good pick.

Not sure how I like Cunningham inside in a 3-4. I'd prefer an edge rusher or corner there but an ILB is very possible as well.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DjBuddaH


Joined: 03 Feb 2006
Posts: 7991
PostPosted: Wed Apr 26, 2017 11:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jags are more likely to take Peterson instead of Kaaya in that trade scenario.
_________________

http://www.footballsfuture.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=7978242#7978242
Esteban wrote:
If people would listen to my advice I would give it but until then I wont
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
onejayhawk


Joined: 14 Apr 2006
Posts: 7554
Location: Waco, Tx
PostPosted: Wed Apr 26, 2017 11:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

KC trading down for an extra 3rd round pick makes sense.

Malik McDowell does not. While a prime talent, his baggage is severe. Perhaps with #104.

Kizer is OK.

J
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
jimbo1904


Joined: 25 Jan 2007
Posts: 2539
PostPosted: Wed Apr 26, 2017 11:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I stopped reading and taking this serious at pick 2.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CentralFC


Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 11746
PostPosted: Wed Apr 26, 2017 11:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

jimbo1904 wrote:
I stopped reading and taking this serious at pick 2.


Darn it. I was hoping I could draw in jimbo with the Homer Simpson avy.

My loss I guess Wink
_________________
packerjmf wrote:
GWH87 wrote:
Somebody take the off season shovel out of Ted's hands & bury him in his own hole.

How can he dig a hole if he's too busy sitting on his hands?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stl4life07


Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4162
PostPosted: Wed Apr 26, 2017 11:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think Watt will be good but Rams need offensive playmakers for Goff. JuJu would be perfect or if not him Jones would be nice. I prefer JuJu though.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DalCowboyzRule


Joined: 10 Feb 2008
Posts: 23257
PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 1:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Man, I wouldn't like that.

I like King and Jackson better than Awuzie, but alright.

Taking a TE in the 2nd and ignoring DL and S? Can't get behind that. I didn't see Derek Rivers anywhere. Give him to us at #60.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
FalconFan13


Joined: 06 Jan 2007
Posts: 11623
PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 2:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Overall it's not a bad mock for the Falcons. It's not exactly the guys i would take at each position where we took them with who was available but it was positions of need and the talent level was there at each pick to justify it.

The guys i would have went with are

1st - Taco Charleton - DE - Top 20 player imo

2nd -Marcus Maye - FS

3rd - Danny Isidora - RG

Now on that note i see Hooker fell to 15. How much do they want for us to come get him at 14 that would be a GREAT PLAYER for our to finish our secondary at FS and fits exactly what we need.

If not him then Reddick at 16 wouldn't be a bad trade up either but would much prefer a top 5 player in hooker if we can somehow get him for fair value.
_________________
2010 and 2013
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
ochocinco4pres


Joined: 04 Apr 2007
Posts: 26419
Location: Indianapolis Indiana
PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 8:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Taco Charlton in the 2nd and it is much better for the Bengals
_________________


Big thanks to kacymcbryant18 for the sig....^^
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
oldman9er


Joined: 24 Oct 2006
Posts: 43420
PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 8:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm a fan of both 1st rd trade backs for SF and KC.

Don't much like the subsequent choices of McCaffery at 6 or the McDowell at 36 though.

Great pick of Davis for SF at 34.

Not a fan of Kizer for KC, but at 59, I wouldn't be angry. Just would hope it works out.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TommyC376


Joined: 08 Feb 2008
Posts: 10981
Location: Capital Wasteland
PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 8:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

With the whole Conely situation. I'd hope Buffalo wouldnt even look at this kid. That being said, Id love Foster or Reddick over Conely.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> 2017 NFL Mock Draft All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group