You are currently viewing the old forums. We have upgraded to a new NFL Forum.
This old forum is being left as a read-only archive.
Please update your bookmarks to our new forum at forums.footballsfuture.com.


 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

Cadmus Mock v2.5A (OL Edition) **Poll Added**
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Green Bay Packers
View previous topic :: View next topic  

What OL prospect in the 2017 NFL Draft appears to be the best fit for the Packers?
Forrest Lamp
11%
 11%  [ 1 ]
Dion Dawkins
44%
 44%  [ 4 ]
Dan Feeney
11%
 11%  [ 1 ]
Nico Siragusa
11%
 11%  [ 1 ]
Kofi Amichia
11%
 11%  [ 1 ]
Levon Myers
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
Corey Levin
11%
 11%  [ 1 ]
Other (Post A Comment)
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
Total Votes : 9

Author Message
SE500


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 931
Location: WISCONSIN
PostPosted: Fri Apr 21, 2017 9:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

This excellent work! Yes, more positions.

I've been on the Lamp train from very early on. Sadly, I do not believe he will be there at 29. How about Feeney with our 2?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
vegas492


Joined: 30 Oct 2012
Posts: 1510
Location: Pewaukee, Wisconsin
PostPosted: Fri Apr 21, 2017 9:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Cadmus wrote:
vegas492 wrote:
I'm a pretty big fan of Feeney in the third. You realistically think he will be there?


At our pick? Probably not.

Miami and Minnesota both desperately need Guards so he could be off the board by the end of the 2nd or he could fall to the middle of the 3rd, but I don't see him dropping much further than that. The only potential curveball with Feeney is the concussion situation. That could drop him to our pick, but would Green Bay even be interested if that were the reason?

I have a high 3rd Rd grade on Feeney and that's the only reason I put him in the 3rd in the mock. It's the same thing with Myers (Late 5th-Early 6th) and Levin (Late 6th). If they were close enough to that round I just selected them with the next pick.


Thanks for the reply. I was thinking more in line with trading one of our 5'th round picks to move up in the third to get a guy like Feeney.
_________________
From my perspective, and I don't know if Brett would say this [publicly] -- I know he's shared with me -- we would not be nearly as appreciative of everything that the Packers are had we not seen it from the other side," ---Ryan Longwell 2016
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Cadmus


Joined: 22 Apr 2013
Posts: 2351
PostPosted: Fri Apr 21, 2017 11:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

vegas492 wrote:
Cadmus wrote:
vegas492 wrote:
I'm a pretty big fan of Feeney in the third. You realistically think he will be there?


At our pick? Probably not.

Miami and Minnesota both desperately need Guards so he could be off the board by the end of the 2nd or he could fall to the middle of the 3rd, but I don't see him dropping much further than that. The only potential curveball with Feeney is the concussion situation. That could drop him to our pick, but would Green Bay even be interested if that were the reason?

I have a high 3rd Rd grade on Feeney and that's the only reason I put him in the 3rd in the mock. It's the same thing with Myers (Late 5th-Early 6th) and Levin (Late 6th). If they were close enough to that round I just selected them with the next pick.


Thanks for the reply. I was thinking more in line with trading one of our 5'th round picks to move up in the third to get a guy like Feeney.


We'll see. There could be a massive run on OL in the 2nd RD. It wouldn't surprise me if almost 1/5 of the picks in the 2nd RD end up being at the OL position.

Question for all of you.

Who strikes you as the most "Packers" OL prospect in the entire NFL Draft?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NormSizedMidget


Joined: 28 Mar 2011
Posts: 17912
PostPosted: Fri Apr 21, 2017 2:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'd love to see this but with pass rushers.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
NCPackFan


Joined: 12 Jan 2013
Posts: 4473
Location: Quahog, RI
PostPosted: Sat Apr 22, 2017 3:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dawkins will not be there at 61 and if he is for some reason, we have to pick him. I think he goes before Lamp.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Cadmus


Joined: 22 Apr 2013
Posts: 2351
PostPosted: Sat Apr 22, 2017 5:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

NCPackFan wrote:
Dawkins will not be there at 61 and if he is for some reason, we have to pick him. I think he goes before Lamp.

Cadmus wrote:
I have a high 3rd Rd grade on Feeney and that's the only reason I put him in the 3rd in the mock. It's the same thing with Myers (Late 5th-Early 6th) and Levin (Late 6th). If they were close enough to that round I just selected them with the next pick.

Cadmus wrote:
There could be a massive run on OL in the 2nd RD. It wouldn't surprise me if almost 1/5 of the picks in the 2nd RD end up being at the OL position.


I'm well aware that Dawkins may not be available at our pick, but I don't see any reason why he would be selected before Lamp.

The primary purpose of the exercise was to evaluate the realistic options for Green Bay at each point in the draft.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CentralFC


Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 11933
PostPosted: Sat Apr 22, 2017 9:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Always stop reading at "X player won't be at [#Y] draft slot."

Wonder how many people would have said that re: Aaron Rodgers at 24 or Bryan Bulaga at 23. Or more recently people adamantly saying Randall would have fallen to the late second round. Players fall for a variety of reasons and sometimes they're ranked vastly differently from team to team.

There are exceptions but generally it's silly. None of us have a clue. It doesn't hurt to speculate in the event someone did fall (like Dawkins to 61; I'm opposed to his pick).
_________________
packerjmf wrote:
GWH87 wrote:
Somebody take the off season shovel out of Ted's hands & bury him in his own hole.

How can he dig a hole if he's too busy sitting on his hands?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Cadmus


Joined: 22 Apr 2013
Posts: 2351
PostPosted: Sat Apr 22, 2017 9:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

CentralFC wrote:
Always stop reading at "X player won't be at [#Y] draft slot."

Wonder how many people would have said that re: Aaron Rodgers at 24 or Bryan Bulaga at 23. Or more recently people adamantly saying Randall would have fallen to the late second round. Players fall for a variety of reasons and sometimes they're ranked vastly differently from team to team.

There are exceptions but generally it's silly. None of us have a clue. It doesn't hurt to speculate in the event someone did fall (like Dawkins to 61; I'm opposed to his pick).


Not a Dawkins fan, eh Central?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CentralFC


Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 11933
PostPosted: Sat Apr 22, 2017 9:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Cadmus wrote:
CentralFC wrote:
Always stop reading at "X player won't be at [#Y] draft slot."

Wonder how many people would have said that re: Aaron Rodgers at 24 or Bryan Bulaga at 23. Or more recently people adamantly saying Randall would have fallen to the late second round. Players fall for a variety of reasons and sometimes they're ranked vastly differently from team to team.

There are exceptions but generally it's silly. None of us have a clue. It doesn't hurt to speculate in the event someone did fall (like Dawkins to 61; I'm opposed to his pick).


Not a Dawkins fan, eh Central?


Neutral. Just not sure about the personality type, some have compared him to Newhouse. Not sure how he fits in in our room.
_________________
packerjmf wrote:
GWH87 wrote:
Somebody take the off season shovel out of Ted's hands & bury him in his own hole.

How can he dig a hole if he's too busy sitting on his hands?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NormSizedMidget


Joined: 28 Mar 2011
Posts: 17912
PostPosted: Sat Apr 22, 2017 9:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

CentralFC wrote:
Cadmus wrote:
CentralFC wrote:
Always stop reading at "X player won't be at [#Y] draft slot."

Wonder how many people would have said that re: Aaron Rodgers at 24 or Bryan Bulaga at 23. Or more recently people adamantly saying Randall would have fallen to the late second round. Players fall for a variety of reasons and sometimes they're ranked vastly differently from team to team.

There are exceptions but generally it's silly. None of us have a clue. It doesn't hurt to speculate in the event someone did fall (like Dawkins to 61; I'm opposed to his pick).


Not a Dawkins fan, eh Central?



Neutral. Just not sure about the personality type, some have compared him to Newhouse. Not sure how he fits in in our room.


I walked into going okay this guy is newhouse. I didn't get that feeling watching it though.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Cadmus


Joined: 22 Apr 2013
Posts: 2351
PostPosted: Sat Apr 22, 2017 9:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

NormSizedMidget wrote:
CentralFC wrote:
Cadmus wrote:
CentralFC wrote:
Always stop reading at "X player won't be at [#Y] draft slot."

Wonder how many people would have said that re: Aaron Rodgers at 24 or Bryan Bulaga at 23. Or more recently people adamantly saying Randall would have fallen to the late second round. Players fall for a variety of reasons and sometimes they're ranked vastly differently from team to team.

There are exceptions but generally it's silly. None of us have a clue. It doesn't hurt to speculate in the event someone did fall (like Dawkins to 61; I'm opposed to his pick).


Not a Dawkins fan, eh Central?



Neutral. Just not sure about the personality type, some have compared him to Newhouse. Not sure how he fits in in our room.


I walked into going okay this guy is newhouse. I didn't get that feeling watching it though.


He's not Newhouse.

I was holding my tongue when that comp was offered up because I didn't think it was worth another FF throwdown.

If everything clicks with Dawkins you are getting a very high-end player IMO.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NormSizedMidget


Joined: 28 Mar 2011
Posts: 17912
PostPosted: Sat Apr 22, 2017 9:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Cadmus wrote:
NormSizedMidget wrote:
CentralFC wrote:
Cadmus wrote:
CentralFC wrote:
Always stop reading at "X player won't be at [#Y] draft slot."

Wonder how many people would have said that re: Aaron Rodgers at 24 or Bryan Bulaga at 23. Or more recently people adamantly saying Randall would have fallen to the late second round. Players fall for a variety of reasons and sometimes they're ranked vastly differently from team to team.

There are exceptions but generally it's silly. None of us have a clue. It doesn't hurt to speculate in the event someone did fall (like Dawkins to 61; I'm opposed to his pick).


Not a Dawkins fan, eh Central?



Neutral. Just not sure about the personality type, some have compared him to Newhouse. Not sure how he fits in in our room.


I walked into going okay this guy is newhouse. I didn't get that feeling watching it though.


He's not Newhouse.

I was holding my tongue when that comp was offered up because I didn't think it was worth another FF throwdown.

If everything clicks with Dawkins you are getting a very high-end player IMO.


I've seen it on at least 10 occasions now. Not just here obviously.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
pgwingman


Joined: 13 Nov 2007
Posts: 479
PostPosted: Sat Apr 22, 2017 10:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nice work Cadmus!

Here's a question for you. Since we lost 2 linemen in the draft, lets say we acquire two replacements via the draft.

Who would you add, given the positions you have them slotted to go?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
squire12


Joined: 15 Mar 2013
Posts: 6579
PostPosted: Sat Apr 22, 2017 10:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I may be in the minority, but for a 5th round pick (last pick in the 5th round), Newhouse has had a pretty solid NFL career. Started 13 games as a rookie for GB on a team that was 15-1 and had a record setting offense.

Bahktiari has certainly developed more than what Newhouse did, but Bahktiari also was playing along side a veteran Sitton/ Lang vs a 1st year starter in TJ Lang.
_________________
Salary Cap Fantasy Football League
2016 Salary Cap League Rosters
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NormSizedMidget


Joined: 28 Mar 2011
Posts: 17912
PostPosted: Sat Apr 22, 2017 10:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

NormSizedMidget wrote:
Cadmus wrote:
NormSizedMidget wrote:
CentralFC wrote:
Cadmus wrote:
CentralFC wrote:
Always stop reading at "X player won't be at [#Y] draft slot."

Wonder how many people would have said that re: Aaron Rodgers at 24 or Bryan Bulaga at 23. Or more recently people adamantly saying Randall would have fallen to the late second round. Players fall for a variety of reasons and sometimes they're ranked vastly differently from team to team.

There are exceptions but generally it's silly. None of us have a clue. It doesn't hurt to speculate in the event someone did fall (like Dawkins to 61; I'm opposed to his pick).


Not a Dawkins fan, eh Central?



Neutral. Just not sure about the personality type, some have compared him to Newhouse. Not sure how he fits in in our room.


I walked into going okay this guy is newhouse. I didn't get that feeling watching it though.


He's not Newhouse.

I was holding my tongue when that comp was offered up because I didn't think it was worth another FF throwdown.

If everything clicks with Dawkins you are getting a very high-end player IMO.


I've seen it on at least 10 occasions now. Not just here obviously.


lmao, I know why now. A certain someone tweeted it Laughing

Got repeated after.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Display posts from previous:   

This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Green Bay Packers All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group