Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

FF Annual Consensus Mock - 27. Kansas City Chiefs (Run-off)
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> NFL Draft
View previous topic :: View next topic  

Who would you select?
TJ Watt [ Edge/LB ] Wisconsin
53%
 53%  [ 36 ]
Zach Cunningham [ LB ] Vanderbilt
46%
 46%  [ 31 ]
Total Votes : 67

Author Message
goldfishwars


Joined: 27 Mar 2011
Posts: 11934
PostPosted: Thu Apr 20, 2017 2:43 am    Post subject: FF Annual Consensus Mock - 27. Kansas City Chiefs (Run-off) Reply with quote

From here:-

http://www.footballsfuture.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=587580
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
onejayhawk


Joined: 14 Apr 2006
Posts: 7514
Location: Waco, Tx
PostPosted: Thu Apr 20, 2017 3:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

No-brainer. Cunning ham and his lousy tackling are still far in front.

J
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Broncofan


Joined: 02 Dec 2013
Posts: 3530
PostPosted: Thu Apr 20, 2017 9:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Man this is tough. TJ Watt has elite EDGE traits, but KC's ILB need is a crying, crying need. With Chris Jones at DE, and Justin Houston & Dee Ford at EDGE, they don't need Watt, and they could use Cunningham.

Still, I have Watt as a clear level above Cunningham, so I'd go there myself - I don't like going need over BPA if the gap is wide enough, and in Watt's case I think there's a big enough gap. If I were to guess what KC would do in this case, though, if those were their 2 choices, I suspect they'd go Cunningham.
_________________
steelpanther wrote:
This is like playing checkers with a pigeon. No matter how well you play, sooner or later the pigeon is going to crap on the board, then puff his chest out and strut around like he won something.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tom cody


Joined: 01 Sep 2007
Posts: 13126
Location: Canada
PostPosted: Thu Apr 20, 2017 9:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Zach Cunningham.
_________________
A conference call is the best way for a dozen people to say “bye” 300 times.

Courtesy of an online joke search.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
chiefs82


Joined: 19 Jan 2007
Posts: 5935
Location: Your Mom's House.
PostPosted: Thu Apr 20, 2017 10:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Watt. Gives KC another pass rusher (You can never have enough) and I think Watt is talented enough (ala CM3) to move inside if he needed to
_________________

________________
ryknowssd on the sig
2014 Adopt-A-Chief: #50 Justin Houston, OLB
Tackles:68/Sacks:22/FF:4
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Forge


Joined: 19 Feb 2010
Posts: 19069
Location: Las Vegas
PostPosted: Thu Apr 20, 2017 11:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Voted Watt...much higher on him than Cunningham
_________________


Stupid NFL coaches and their need to reach for quarterbacks....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
KofQ


Joined: 29 Mar 2014
Posts: 998
Location: IA
PostPosted: Thu Apr 20, 2017 11:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Watt over Cunningham. Imo the value is not even close
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
samsel23


Joined: 30 Sep 2008
Posts: 4938
PostPosted: Thu Apr 20, 2017 11:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Definitely Watt if we're picking between these 2 at this point in the draft.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PossibleCabbage


Joined: 25 Apr 2011
Posts: 4791
PostPosted: Thu Apr 20, 2017 1:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Watt is a guy who might give you something as an edge, and if that doesn't work out you can make a pretty good ILB out of him.

Cunningham is a pure ILB that has a lot of meaningful limitations: you've got to keep him clean, he's not especially physical, or an especially good tackler. I'm not sure the upside is high enough to be worth dealing with the limitations.

So it seems like this should be Watt. When in doubt take the guy who can play two positions.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
AFfootballguy


Joined: 09 Apr 2017
Posts: 2
Location: Woodland Park, CO
PostPosted: Thu Apr 20, 2017 2:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Watt can play ILB or OLB in 3-4 and with Dee Fords contract coming up he fills multiple possible voids.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Forge


Joined: 19 Feb 2010
Posts: 19069
Location: Las Vegas
PostPosted: Thu Apr 20, 2017 2:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's funny. When I voted, it made the score 18-18. All of the comments after mine support Watt, yet the current voting stands at 26-25 Cunningham Laughing
_________________


Stupid NFL coaches and their need to reach for quarterbacks....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Iamcanadian


Joined: 16 Jan 2006
Posts: 228
Location: Wallaceburg, Ontario, Canada
PostPosted: Thu Apr 20, 2017 2:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ae Foster, Reddick and Jarrad Davis all off the board, because if any of them are available, they will be the pick.
_________________
and proud of it!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
PossibleCabbage


Joined: 25 Apr 2011
Posts: 4791
PostPosted: Thu Apr 20, 2017 3:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Forge wrote:
It's funny. When I voted, it made the score 18-18. All of the comments after mine support Watt, yet the current voting stands at 26-25 Cunningham :lol:


There was a post on the GB forum saying "go vote for Cunningham" so I suspect there might be shenanigans by fans of some teams picking 28th or later who want Watt.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Broncofan


Joined: 02 Dec 2013
Posts: 3530
PostPosted: Thu Apr 20, 2017 3:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

PossibleCabbage wrote:
Forge wrote:
It's funny. When I voted, it made the score 18-18. All of the comments after mine support Watt, yet the current voting stands at 26-25 Cunningham Laughing


There was a post on the GB forum saying "go vote for Cunningham" so I suspect there might be shenanigans by fans of some teams picking 28th or later who want Watt.


Because this draft affects RL outcome, or who teams get from this mock really matters enough to stack voting on other teams? Sheesh.
_________________
steelpanther wrote:
This is like playing checkers with a pigeon. No matter how well you play, sooner or later the pigeon is going to crap on the board, then puff his chest out and strut around like he won something.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Iamcanadian


Joined: 16 Jan 2006
Posts: 228
Location: Wallaceburg, Ontario, Canada
PostPosted: Thu Apr 20, 2017 3:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Broncofan wrote:
PossibleCabbage wrote:
Forge wrote:
It's funny. When I voted, it made the score 18-18. All of the comments after mine support Watt, yet the current voting stands at 26-25 Cunningham Laughing


There was a post on the GB forum saying "go vote for Cunningham" so I suspect there might be shenanigans by fans of some teams picking 28th or later who want Watt.


Because this draft affects RL outcome, or who teams get from this mock really matters enough to stack voting on other teams? Sheesh.


Fans will be fans!!!
_________________
and proud of it!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> NFL Draft All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group