Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

2 Rounds with Trades
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> 2017 NFL Mock Draft
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
BearsSaveLives


Joined: 17 Apr 2012
Posts: 237
PostPosted: Sun Apr 16, 2017 2:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

bananabucket wrote:
BearsSaveLives wrote:
The Bears are better off seeing what Glennon can do this year


I can let you know now if you want.


No spoilers.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Hootlander


Joined: 12 Jan 2008
Posts: 1146
PostPosted: Sun Apr 16, 2017 5:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

[quote="Suffering_Bills"]Don't think the Bills would do that, even though I love the pick. We only have 6 selections in this draft.[/quote]

I agree particularly with Davis, Conley (From what I have heard he has better skills than Lattimore but about .4 seconds slower and no major leg issues), or Humphries who is a beast.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
FalconFan13


Joined: 06 Jan 2007
Posts: 11623
PostPosted: Sun Apr 16, 2017 8:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

31- 49ers : D.Kizer QB ND
Falcons receive #34+#109
With the draft chart it works but i wonder if the Falcons would ask for a higher price considering the Niners will draft the QB of the future.

I like the trade down and think the value is ok. It works on the chart so it works for me. Plus we have alot of players we would take that are setting there meaning we can trade down and still get 1 of them guaranteed it's a win/win.

Now as for the picks i like Watt but i dang sure don't take him over a better Edge rusher in Takk Mckinley. If Takk or Taco are gone then i would say Watt or Harris would be the next best but to me their 2nd round players and takk and taco are top 20 to 25 1st round guys.

2nd round i like attacking the OG position and Moton is a pretty solid player with nice athleticism for his size. No problems here truthfully.

In the 3rd round i take a FS and call the draft a success.
_________________
2010 and 2013
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
raidr4life


Joined: 10 Jan 2010
Posts: 8682
Location: Fresno, California
PostPosted: Sun Apr 16, 2017 9:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Like the 2nd round pick the 1st not so much.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
The OUTLAW


Joined: 05 Jan 2005
Posts: 8637
PostPosted: Mon Apr 17, 2017 12:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't see the Browns trading up for Trubisky. If he's not there at 12, they go another way.
_________________
You show me a good loser, and I'll show you a loser

Vince Lombardi
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
The OUTLAW


Joined: 05 Jan 2005
Posts: 8637
PostPosted: Mon Apr 17, 2017 12:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't see the Browns trading up for Trubisky. If he's not there at 12, they go another way.
_________________
You show me a good loser, and I'll show you a loser

Vince Lombardi
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
zappa13004


Joined: 04 Jan 2014
Posts: 1159
PostPosted: Mon Apr 17, 2017 12:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

bucsfan333 wrote:
zappa13004 wrote:
bucsfan333 wrote:
Guard isn't a need for us. We have more interior guys than we know what to do with. Jordan Willis or a guy like Chris Godwin would probably be the pick.

I think that's too early for Obi but I think we're gonna do it.
Marpet will get a try at center and i bet he could succeed.

I know that. We also have Sweezy who is finally back to 100%, and will play RG. And we have last year's starter at LG, Kevin Pamphile. We also resigned Joe Hawley and have Evan Smith and Ben Gottschalk, who all played last year.
I know. Not saying im right but my thought is Feeney an upgrade over Pamphile (who can be a back-up G and RT) and i do not like your centers so Marpet could be a nice fit there. Koetter said hes okay with Hawley and Smith but you cant try Marpet at center and tell it to the media if you feel great about them. So he wants to try Marpet at center hoping it will upgrade the position and so i think guard can be a realistic spot to draft considering the young franchise QB and the need to have a better running-game.
But thats just a thought. Your suggestions of Goodwin or Willis are good.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
zappa13004


Joined: 04 Jan 2014
Posts: 1159
PostPosted: Mon Apr 17, 2017 12:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The OUTLAW wrote:
I don't see the Browns trading up for Trubisky. If he's not there at 12, they go another way.
You dont see it and i see it. We'll see soon.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
zappa13004


Joined: 04 Jan 2014
Posts: 1159
PostPosted: Mon Apr 17, 2017 12:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

raidr4life wrote:
Like the 2nd round pick the 1st not so much.
Not a need. First you think about a CB, a disruptive DT or a LB like Davis or Cunningham but...Carr has a strong arm, Cook and Crabtree on intermediate, Cooper outside, Lynch to fix the defense in the box and so...Ross to fly as a deep threat, that sounds good to me.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
zappa13004


Joined: 04 Jan 2014
Posts: 1159
PostPosted: Mon Apr 17, 2017 1:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

FalconFan13 wrote:
31- 49ers : D.Kizer QB ND
Falcons receive #34+#109
With the draft chart it works but i wonder if the Falcons would ask for a higher price considering the Niners will draft the QB of the future.

I like the trade down and think the value is ok. It works on the chart so it works for me. Plus we have alot of players we would take that are setting there meaning we can trade down and still get 1 of them guaranteed it's a win/win.

Now as for the picks i like Watt but i dang sure don't take him over a better Edge rusher in Takk Mckinley. If Takk or Taco are gone then i would say Watt or Harris would be the next best but to me their 2nd round players and takk and taco are top 20 to 25 1st round guys.

2nd round i like attacking the OG position and Moton is a pretty solid player with nice athleticism for his size. No problems here truthfully.

In the 3rd round i take a FS and call the draft a success.
I did hesitate between Watt and Takk but i thought an OLB would be better with Jones and Campbell. I like Takk, his speed and his motor but hes more unidimensional than Watt. Okay his "dimension" is pass rush and thats the best dimension to have as an OLB/DE but, more complete i chose Watt. I'd say 1-Watt 2-Feeney 3-Takk but sure i'd be okay with the latter..
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
zappa13004


Joined: 04 Jan 2014
Posts: 1159
PostPosted: Mon Apr 17, 2017 1:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

BearsSaveLives wrote:
I know Davis Webb is telling people that he's been told he's a first-round talent, but the Bears taking him in the 2nd seems like a huge reach. The Bears are better off seeing what Glennon can do this year and, if he fails, taking someone from next year's class of QBs.

Instead of Webb, I'd rather they take Garrett Bolles and try to shore up one of the tackle positions.
I thought Webb and his arm would be nice playing outside in winter but sure Bolles could be a better pick as your line is strong inside but not so much outside.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
The Gnat


Moderator
Joined: 23 Feb 2005
Posts: 39225
Location: Minneapolis
PostPosted: Mon Apr 17, 2017 8:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I would say very good for the Vikings, but passing on Feeney, I'd must prefer OG.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
scar988


FF Fanatic
Joined: 05 Apr 2005
Posts: 30257
Location: Marietta, GA
PostPosted: Mon Apr 17, 2017 9:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Love it for the Falcons. Pick up a high 5th to move down and still get two of their guys.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
zappa13004


Joined: 04 Jan 2014
Posts: 1159
PostPosted: Mon Apr 17, 2017 9:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Gnat wrote:
I would say very good for the Vikings, but passing on Feeney, I'd must prefer OG.
That exactly was my hesitation. Feeney sounds like the right pick but with McDowell available i did hesitate and thought than Zimmer would like to have a high profile DT thinking he could make him reach his potential.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
playboi24


Joined: 03 Jan 2006
Posts: 1004
Location: Tomball, Tx
PostPosted: Mon Apr 17, 2017 9:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I would absolutely hate to see Mahomes fall to the 20's only to see the Texans not do anything and have him drafted elsewhere. But knowing our front office, it would not surprise me.

Good draft for the Texans. Not super high on Watson, but given that Mahomes is gone, Id grab him.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> 2017 NFL Mock Draft All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group