Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

FF Annual Consensus Mock - 4. Jacksonville Jaguars
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> NFL Draft
View previous topic :: View next topic  

Who Should They Take?
Christian McCaffrey [ RB ] Stanford
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
Corey Davis [ WR ] Western Michigan
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
Dalvin Cook [ RB ] Florida State
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
Derek Barnett [ DE ] Tennessee
1%
 1%  [ 1 ]
Deshaun Watson [ QB ] Clemson
2%
 2%  [ 2 ]
DeShone Kizer [ QB ] Notre Dame
1%
 1%  [ 1 ]
Haason Reddick [ OLB ] Temple
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
Jabrill Peppers [ SS ] Michigan
2%
 2%  [ 2 ]
John Ross [ WR ] Washington
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
Jonathan Allen [ DT ] Alabama
23%
 23%  [ 21 ]
Leonard Fournette [ RB ] LSU
47%
 47%  [ 42 ]
Malik Hooker [ FS ] Ohio State
3%
 3%  [ 3 ]
Malik McDowell [ DT ] Michigan State
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
Marlon Humphrey [ CB ] Alabama
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
Marshon Lattimore [ CB ] Ohio State
7%
 7%  [ 7 ]
Mike Williams [ WR ] Clemson
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
Mitch Trubisky [ QB ] North Carolina
5%
 5%  [ 5 ]
O.J. Howard [ TE ] Alabama
2%
 2%  [ 2 ]
Patrick Mahomes II [ QB ] Texas Tech
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
Reuben Foster [ ILB ] Alabama
2%
 2%  [ 2 ]
Total Votes : 88

Author Message
goldfishwars


Joined: 27 Mar 2011
Posts: 11929
PostPosted: Thu Mar 23, 2017 11:29 am    Post subject: FF Annual Consensus Mock - 4. Jacksonville Jaguars Reply with quote

Okay, let's do this.

Rules:
Each Poll will last no longer than 24 hours (or as near as I can)
Run-offs will take place where there is no clear leader of 15% of the vote share or more
I will post a link to the poll in each team's forum

Poll Choices
Prospects on each poll will come from the CBS prospect rankings list, but I will welcome nominations for the each poll. This is to try and prevent complaints about poll choices.
http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/prospectrankings

I will endeavour to fill all slots and do so in alphabetical order. Draft needs of teams will be considered and override the prospect rankings in certain situations.

Please contribute to the discussions within each poll and give reasons why you voted the way you did if you can. Your vote should be based on who you would pick and not a prediction of who they will select.

Draft Order:
1. Cleveland Browns: Myles Garrett [DE] Texas A&M
http://www.footballsfuture.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=586943
2. San Francisco 49ers: Solomon Thomas [DE] Stanford
http://www.footballsfuture.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=586983
3. Chicago Bears: Jamal Adams [SS] LSU
http://www.footballsfuture.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=587003
4. Jacksonville Jaguars
5. Tennessee Titans (From LA)
6. New York Jets
7. LA Chargers
8. Carolina Panthers
9. Cincinnati Benglas
10. Buffalo Bills
11. New Orleans Saints
12. Cleveland Browns
13. Arizona Cardinals
14. Philadelphia Eagles (From Minnesota)
15. Indianapolis Colts
16. Baltimore Ravens
17. Washington Redskins
18. Tennessee Titans
19. Tampa Bay Buccaneers
20. Denver Broncos
21. Detroit Lions
22. Miami Dolphins
23. Oakland Raiders
24. New York Giants
25. Houston Texans
26. Seattle Seahawks
27. Dallas Cowboys
28. Kansas City Chiefs
29. Pittsburgh Steelers
30. Green Bay Packers
31. Atlanta Falcons
32. New Orleans Saints (From New England)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
gopherwrestler


Joined: 20 Jan 2014
Posts: 5567
Location: 'Sota
PostPosted: Thu Mar 23, 2017 11:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I went Trubisky even tho every single Jaguar fan is going to end up arguing.
I think it would be smart to either move on for Bortles, or at least have the option to.

They really should be a better offense with the talent there.
_________________

“Once you’ve wrestled, everything else in life is easy.”
-Dan Gable
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Broncofan


Joined: 02 Dec 2013
Posts: 3525
PostPosted: Thu Mar 23, 2017 11:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'll go Jonathan Allen. Jax plays both 3-4 and 4-3 schemes, right? Room for Campbell, Malik Jackson, Allen & Fowler to get on the field.

No excuses for Bradley if the D underperforms this year.
_________________
steelpanther wrote:
This is like playing checkers with a pigeon. No matter how well you play, sooner or later the pigeon is going to crap on the board, then puff his chest out and strut around like he won something.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
WindyCity


Joined: 26 Jun 2009
Posts: 16467
PostPosted: Thu Mar 23, 2017 11:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I went Fournette

They need to base the offense around something other than Bortles and let him play off of a strong run game and play action.
_________________
John Fox
3-13 this season, 9-23 overall, 4-12 at home
Pathetic
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
brownie man


Joined: 26 Jan 2008
Posts: 8197
PostPosted: Thu Mar 23, 2017 11:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I went Fournette.

You can't give up on Bortles yet draft a QB later like a Chad Kelly this is too high.

Defensive wise you just paid a lot of guys this year and last so you've got to let that shake out.

No O line available worth the pick.

Whoever is going to be the QB will be helped out by a dominate running game.
_________________
My Favorite Guys This draft
Deshone Kizer, Malik Hooker, Carlos Watkins, Adoree Jackson, Budda Baker, TJ Watt, Montravius Adams, Ryan Switzer, Kendall Beckwith, Davis Webb, Des Lawrence, Shelton Gibson, Jamaal Williams, Bucky Hodges
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mse326


Moderator
Joined: 19 Jan 2008
Posts: 18083
Location: mike23md on the sig
PostPosted: Thu Mar 23, 2017 11:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

This was actually difficult. Their defense is definitely better than the offense but the offense biggest issue is Bortles and I don't think any of the QBs are worth this pick. I don't think Fournette turns them around at all (running issues to me were more about loaded boxes and poor OL play). Too high for guard. I considered Howard.

While the defense is strong from a yards standpoint they were horrible in creating turnovers. More experience from their young guys can go a long way in that but I think they need another playmaker. So I would go with Hooker.

But I can definitely see them going a few different directions.
_________________

#JDI


Last edited by mse326 on Thu Mar 23, 2017 11:42 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Forge


Joined: 19 Feb 2010
Posts: 19036
Location: Las Vegas
PostPosted: Thu Mar 23, 2017 11:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Broncofan wrote:
I'll go Jonathan Allen. Jax plays both 3-4 and 4-3 schemes, right? Room for Campbell, Malik Jackson, Allen & Fowler to get on the field.

No excuses for Bradley if the D underperforms this year.


I'd like to think that Bradley has the best excuse if that defense under performs this year Laughing
_________________


Stupid NFL coaches and their need to reach for quarterbacks....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CalhounLambeau


Joined: 05 May 2011
Posts: 11519
Location: WI
PostPosted: Thu Mar 23, 2017 11:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Marshon Lattimore.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Forge


Joined: 19 Feb 2010
Posts: 19036
Location: Las Vegas
PostPosted: Thu Mar 23, 2017 11:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

gopherwrestler wrote:
I went Trubisky even tho every single Jaguar fan is going to end up arguing.
I think it would be smart to either move on for Bortles, or at least have the option to.

They really should be a better offense with the talent there.


Interesting decision. I agree that I would be looking at a young quarterback to develop to replace Bortles, but I don't know that you do that with a top pick in this draft. 2 years ago, Bortles was okay. He was a nightmare last year, and they definitely have to get his mechanics together, but the team would seem to have a roster that can make a run this year. At least to the playoffs. I think I'd rather get someone who's going to make a big impact hopefully at the top of the draft and then take a developmental guy maybe on day 2 in round 3? Grab a Kaaya or Peterman or Webb if you have grades on them high enough to take them.
_________________


Stupid NFL coaches and their need to reach for quarterbacks....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rich7sena


Joined: 12 Sep 2009
Posts: 6844
PostPosted: Thu Mar 23, 2017 11:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I went with Fournette. He's not my #1 RB, but he'd be the #1 RB I'd pick for the Jags. I'd dedicate this draft to build up the offensive line and transform the focus of the offense toward the running game. O.J. Howard would be my second choice.

Last edited by Rich7sena on Thu Mar 23, 2017 12:08 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Forge


Joined: 19 Feb 2010
Posts: 19036
Location: Las Vegas
PostPosted: Thu Mar 23, 2017 11:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rich7sena wrote:
I went with Fournette. He's not my #1 RB, but he's be the #1 RB I'd pick for the Jags. I'd dedicate this draft to build up the offensive line and transform the focus of the offense toward the running game. O.J. Howard would be my second choice.


This is supposed to be about what you would do though, isn't it? So why wouldn't you take your #1?

I too am having hard time choosing between Howard and maybe Fournette
_________________


Stupid NFL coaches and their need to reach for quarterbacks....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
G08


Joined: 28 Feb 2011
Posts: 6848
Location: World Championsville
PostPosted: Thu Mar 23, 2017 11:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I like Allen here... build the lines.
_________________
topwop1 wrote:
My point is you can find a franchise guy like [Derek] Carr in every draft


"I thought it was a stroke of genius. You give [Pace] an A++++ for the move to get Trubisky. That was magnificient." - Bill Polian
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
reamer


Joined: 15 Feb 2010
Posts: 484
PostPosted: Thu Mar 23, 2017 11:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

CalhounLambeau wrote:
Marshon Lattimore.


Lattimore, Bouye, and Ramsey have the potential to be a pretty special trio. I like it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rich7sena


Joined: 12 Sep 2009
Posts: 6844
PostPosted: Thu Mar 23, 2017 12:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Forge wrote:
This is supposed to be about what you would do though, isn't it? So why wouldn't you take your #1?

I too am having hard time choosing between Howard and maybe Fournette

I would take Fournette for the Jags over Cook. Didn't I make that clear?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Forge


Joined: 19 Feb 2010
Posts: 19036
Location: Las Vegas
PostPosted: Thu Mar 23, 2017 12:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rich7sena wrote:
Forge wrote:
This is supposed to be about what you would do though, isn't it? So why wouldn't you take your #1?

I too am having hard time choosing between Howard and maybe Fournette

I would take Fournette for the Jags over Cook. Didn't I make that clear?


You did, but apparently my eyes got sleepy and lazy and stopped reading after the first part Laughing
_________________


Stupid NFL coaches and their need to reach for quarterbacks....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> NFL Draft All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group