Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

2 Rounds
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> 2017 NFL Mock Draft
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
zappa13004


Joined: 04 Jan 2014
Posts: 1148
PostPosted: Mon Mar 20, 2017 5:59 am    Post subject: 2 Rounds Reply with quote

1- Browns : M.Garrett DE TAM
2- 49ers : J.Adams S LSU
3- Bears : S.Thomas DE Stanford
4- Jaguars : M.Hooker S Ohio St
5- Titans : R.Foster LB Alabama
6- Jets : H.Reddick LB Temple
7- Chargers : J.Allen DE Alabama
8- Panthers : OJ.Howard TE Alabama
9- Bengals : M.Williams WR Clemson
10- Bills : M.Lattimore CB Ohio St
11- Saints : D.Barnett DE Tennessee
12- Browns : M.Trubisky QB UNC
13- Cards : D.Kizer QB ND
14- Eagles :L.Fournette RB LSU
15- Colts : D.Cook RB Florida St
16- Ravens : C.Davis WR West Michigan
17- Redskins : C.McCaffrey RB Stanford
18- Titans : J.Ross WR Washington
19- Bucs : D.Njoku TE Miami
20- Broncos : G.Bolles OT Utah
21- Lions : G.Conley CB Ohio St
22- Dolphins : F.Lamp G West Kent
23- Giants : R.Ramczyk OT Wisconsin
24- Raiders : C.Robinson OT Alabama
25- Texans : O.Melifonwu S UConn
26- Seahawks : M.McDowell DT Michigan St
27- Chiefs : M.Humphrey CB Alabama
28- Cowboys : J.Peppers S Michigan
29- Packers : C.Harris DE Mizzou
30- Steelers : TJ.Watt OLB Wisconsin
31- Falcons : T.Charlton DE Michigan
32- Saints : D.Watson QB Clemson

33. Browns - B.Baker S Washington
34. 49ers - J.Davis LB Florida
35. Jaguars - E.Engram TE Ole Miss
36. Bears - T.White CB LSU
37. Rams - T.McKinley OLB UCLA
38. Chargers - M.Williams S Utah
39. Jets - T.Williams OLB Alabama
40. Panthers - C.Samuel WR Ohio St
41. Bengals - D.Feeney G Indiana
42. Saints - A.Jackson CB USC
43. Eagles - T.Tabor CB Florida
44. Bills - J.Smith-Schuster WR USC
45. Cardinals - C.Awuzie CB Colorado
46. Colts - C.Lawson OLB Auburn
47. Ravens - J.Willis OLB Kansas St
48. Vikings - D.Dawkins G Temple
49. Redskins - Z.Cunningham LB Vanderbilt
50. Buccaneers - A.Kamara RB Tennessee
51. Broncos - A.Shaheen TE Ashland
52. Browns - K.King CB Washington
53. Lions - J.Mixon RB Oklahoma
54. Dolphins - T.Kpassagnon DE Villanova
55. Giants - C.Brantley DT Florida
56. Raiders - F.Moreau CB UCLA
57. Texans - P.Mahomes QB Texas Tech
58. Seahawks - E.Pocic G LSU
59. Chiefs - R.McMillan LB Ohio St
60. Cowboys - D.Walker DE florida St
61. Packers - Q.Wilson CB Florida
62. Steelers - A.Witherspoon CB Colorado
63. Falcons - T.Moton G West Michigan
64. Panthers - D.Rivers DE Youngstown
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
INbengalfan


Joined: 21 Jan 2006
Posts: 7734
Location: Richmond, IN
PostPosted: Mon Mar 20, 2017 7:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't mind the Bengals picks per se, but in a draft where we are going to focus on defense, getting two offensive players doesn't feel right.

If we go WR in the first, I just think Davis is a better overall fit than Williams.
In the second, I know we lost Zeitler, but still have Westerman in the wings, plus we brought back Andre Smith specifically to play RG.

If we stick with the 2 offensive players in two rounds, it would be a totally Bengals-like move to roll the dice on Mixon. But in reality, we HAVE to get a DE in the first two rounds.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
The Gnat


Moderator
Joined: 23 Feb 2005
Posts: 39143
Location: Minneapolis
PostPosted: Mon Mar 20, 2017 8:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Can't disagree with that Vikings pick. RG is definitely the biggest need.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Counselor


Joined: 31 Jan 2017
Posts: 1693
PostPosted: Mon Mar 20, 2017 9:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Shaheen worries me a bit that early. He could be a beast early because of his physical make up or he could take years to develop. I don't want these second round picks who are developmental anymore. (Sambrailo, Gotsis) If we are going TE there give me Bucky. If we fill another position than Shaheen round 3 I'm fine with.
_________________
In reference to concern about Joshua Dobbs' Knees

48 1/2ers wrote:
Ostriches have inverted knees and they're pretty athletic...


GIF of Ostrich Running Here...

The Wheat Grass Shooting Hippies made me get rid of it...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ochocinco4pres


Joined: 04 Apr 2007
Posts: 26350
Location: Indianapolis Indiana
PostPosted: Mon Mar 20, 2017 9:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I hope they take Davis over Williams if they are going WR. I like Feeney.
_________________


Big thanks to kacymcbryant18 for the sig....^^
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MikeT14


Joined: 02 Jan 2006
Posts: 10005
PostPosted: Mon Mar 20, 2017 9:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I would love
_________________

- mike23md

D.C. Sports: Hope is fine, but believing is where we screw up.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kyu


Joined: 26 Feb 2014
Posts: 387
PostPosted: Mon Mar 20, 2017 10:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I love Reddick and think he's going to be a stud, but Lattimore should be the pick for us.

Even with Claiborne our DBs as a group are lacking, and that's being kind about it. We have some youngsters, but no one who should really keep us from drafting one.

Lattimore scares me a bit with the soft tissue injuries, just look at Dee Milliner, but he's exactly what we're looking for at CB. If Adams and Hooker are off the board, Lattimore should be the pick.

And ew, I personally don't like Tim Williams at all. He seems like Jarvis Jones 2.0 to me. Give us a pass rusher who can stand up in the 2nd.
_________________
J.e.t.s.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bananabucket


Joined: 29 Dec 2013
Posts: 1489
PostPosted: Mon Mar 20, 2017 11:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

15- Colts : D.Cook RB Florida St
46. Colts - C.Lawson OLB Auburn

Works for me. Though if we're gonna go RB/OLB, I think Charlton/Kamara would be a bit better.

If you add rounds, definitely make sure to give the Colts a corner.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mastercheddaar


Joined: 14 Dec 2006
Posts: 5411
Location: Northeast Ohio.. Obviously
PostPosted: Mon Mar 20, 2017 1:21 pm    Post subject: hmmm Reply with quote

For Cleveland - Garret is a given but at #12 with Fournette on the board still... Fournette > Trubisky. We could easily trade back into the 1st to draft Trubisky with several of our dozens of draft picks if needed.

that is all

mastercheddaar
_________________
For those that don't know:
NFL - AFC Browns, NFC Eagles
Basket Ball - Cavs
Baseball - Indians/Yankees.
CF - Ohio State and Wake Forest
Women - Brunettes with Blue eyes.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
zappa13004


Joined: 04 Jan 2014
Posts: 1148
PostPosted: Mon Mar 20, 2017 2:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

bananabucket wrote:
15- Colts : D.Cook RB Florida St
46. Colts - C.Lawson OLB Auburn

Works for me. Though if we're gonna go RB/OLB, I think Charlton/Kamara would be a bit better.

If you add rounds, definitely make sure to give the Colts a corner.
I understand your reasoning except when you're on the clock in the 1st, you have no idea about who will be available in the second. Doing a mock you can do that..
But sure Charlton/Kamara sounds good to me and a CB too. Thanks
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
zappa13004


Joined: 04 Jan 2014
Posts: 1148
PostPosted: Mon Mar 20, 2017 2:58 pm    Post subject: Re: hmmm Reply with quote

Mastercheddaar wrote:
For Cleveland - Garret is a given but at #12 with Fournette on the board still... Fournette > Trubisky. We could easily trade back into the 1st to draft Trubisky with several of our dozens of draft picks if needed.

that is all

mastercheddaar
Fournette >Trubisky>Kessler. You can imagine any scenario but on draft day just take the guy you want because if you think you have time and can work something later...Oops the guy is gine elsewhere. Thanks
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
zappa13004


Joined: 04 Jan 2014
Posts: 1148
PostPosted: Mon Mar 20, 2017 3:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kyu wrote:
I love Reddick and think he's going to be a stud, but Lattimore should be the pick for us.

Even with Claiborne our DBs as a group are lacking, and that's being kind about it. We have some youngsters, but no one who should really keep us from drafting one.

Lattimore scares me a bit with the soft tissue injuries, just look at Dee Milliner, but he's exactly what we're looking for at CB. If Adams and Hooker are off the board, Lattimore should be the pick.

And ew, I personally don't like Tim Williams at all. He seems like Jarvis Jones 2.0 to me. Give us a pass rusher who can stand up in the 2nd.
I didn't think about Claiborne but about what you wrote about Lattimore. Like for Allen i think he will slide some because of medical concerns. Thanks.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
zappa13004


Joined: 04 Jan 2014
Posts: 1148
PostPosted: Mon Mar 20, 2017 3:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

MikeT14 wrote:
I would love
The 'Skins really need defense but McCaffrey would be great ! Thanks
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
zappa13004


Joined: 04 Jan 2014
Posts: 1148
PostPosted: Mon Mar 20, 2017 3:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ochocinco4pres wrote:
I hope they take Davis over Williams if they are going WR. I like Feeney.
I really like Williams and don't know who they like best ? Thanks
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
zappa13004


Joined: 04 Jan 2014
Posts: 1148
PostPosted: Mon Mar 20, 2017 3:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

INbengalfan wrote:
I don't mind the Bengals picks per se, but in a draft where we are going to focus on defense, getting two offensive players doesn't feel right.

If we go WR in the first, I just think Davis is a better overall fit than Williams.
In the second, I know we lost Zeitler, but still have Westerman in the wings, plus we brought back Andre Smith specifically to play RG.

If we stick with the 2 offensive players in two rounds, it would be a totally Bengals-like move to roll the dice on Mixon. But in reality, we HAVE to get a DE in the first two rounds.
I know about your need of a DE but i think than Mike Williams > Barnett/Harris/Charlton etc and Feeney>Kpassagnon/Willis/Walker etc. Thanks
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> 2017 NFL Mock Draft All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group