| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Bonanza23
Joined: 10 Nov 2008
Posts: 11470
|
 Posted: Wed Apr 26, 2017 1:58 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| buno67 wrote: | | poorbytehshore wrote: | Darnold is so different to Barkley. The only comparison is USC. And it's irrelevant to compare guys because of school.
Darnold's going number one whenever he comes out. I would bet everything on it. He's just an elite prospect and on a different level to anyone in this class. |
Well I said Barkley because the year prior to him being drafted, people were projecting him as the #1. Cant blame tho, he jr year was pretty godly. Senior year tho, just never put it back together and the scouts just killed him breaking him done even more
I just googled, way to early 2013 mock drafts and Barkley was considered to be a favorite for the #1 pick rather quickly as the 2012 NFL draft finished just finished.
http://www.sbnation.com/2012/5/3/2995751/way-to-early-2013-mock-draft
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1123893-2013-nfl-mock-draft-a-way-too-early-prediction
http://walterfootball.com/draft2013archive_0915.php
2/3 of those mocks had the Browns taking Barkley #1 overalll.
I know Darnold right now is the sexy name and pick for next year but it might not hold up |
Yeah you can easily call him Barkley.
Although I fully admit I like Darnold better as a prospect. BUT defenses could figure him out and he can end up being a dud. He could mess up his leg. Calling him a sure fire thing at this moment is wrong. Passing on a guy this year who you think can be a franchise guy for what may or may not happen next year can also get guys fired.
_________________
[img]this is my new sig.[/img]
Thanks Reg! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bonanza23
Joined: 10 Nov 2008
Posts: 11470
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 26, 2017 1:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Hah I got it to 100 
And I start the new page yet again.  I am the all time new page starter. Of all time.
Dang I need to get to work 
_________________
[img]this is my new sig.[/img]
Thanks Reg! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
buno67
Joined: 15 Mar 2007
Posts: 40997
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 26, 2017 2:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Bonanza23 wrote: | | buno67 wrote: | | poorbytehshore wrote: | Darnold is so different to Barkley. The only comparison is USC. And it's irrelevant to compare guys because of school.
Darnold's going number one whenever he comes out. I would bet everything on it. He's just an elite prospect and on a different level to anyone in this class. |
Well I said Barkley because the year prior to him being drafted, people were projecting him as the #1. Cant blame tho, he jr year was pretty godly. Senior year tho, just never put it back together and the scouts just killed him breaking him done even more
I just googled, way to early 2013 mock drafts and Barkley was considered to be a favorite for the #1 pick rather quickly as the 2012 NFL draft finished just finished.
http://www.sbnation.com/2012/5/3/2995751/way-to-early-2013-mock-draft
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1123893-2013-nfl-mock-draft-a-way-too-early-prediction
http://walterfootball.com/draft2013archive_0915.php
2/3 of those mocks had the Browns taking Barkley #1 overalll.
I know Darnold right now is the sexy name and pick for next year but it might not hold up |
Yeah you can easily call him Barkley.
Although I fully admit I like Darnold better as a prospect. BUT defenses could figure him out and he can end up being a dud. He could mess up his leg. Calling him a sure fire thing at this moment is wrong. Passing on a guy this year who you think can be a franchise guy for what may or may not happen next year can also get guys fired. |
Darnold hit it big because of that bowl game, it was a bowl game he had 2-3 weeks to prepare. I would hope a QB would look great with that much time. This season is going to big for him, thats for sure. He was an unknown who took over for a struggling QB and just got better each week. Has that huge Rose Bowl. So know he spent all that time getting better last year with no lime light or distraction. Now he has to handle all that along with prepping for the season. Hell last year, he has somewhat a down game and no one really cared. Next year if he has a bad game, everyone one will talk about it. the USC UCLA game is going to be huge next year |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
poorbytehshore
Joined: 03 Nov 2009
Posts: 3744
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 26, 2017 2:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Darnold was killing it all season long before the Bowl Game. We get a lot of the USC games over here on repeat on the Sunday mornings and I watched him week in week out make incredible throws and show mad poise.
His traits compared to Barkley are just so far off. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
buno67
Joined: 15 Mar 2007
Posts: 40997
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 26, 2017 10:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| poorbytehshore wrote: | Darnold was killing it all season long before the Bowl Game. We get a lot of the USC games over here on repeat on the Sunday mornings and I watched him week in week out make incredible throws and show mad poise.
His traits compared to Barkley are just so far off. |
I am not saying he is the same QB as Barkley. Just said the situation could be similar.
After the season Barkley had after his junior year, he was widely considered to be the #1 QB in the following years draft. The hype was real because that was a damn amazing season he had. Darnold is in a similar situation. Its more so than just being USC.
I am a fan of Darnold but I am not going to say he is for sure going to be 100% sure thing. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
