Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

Bears agree to terms with QB Mike Glennon
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Chicago Bears
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Sugashane


Joined: 06 Jan 2013
Posts: 3131
PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2017 1:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

bearsfan323 wrote:
WindyCity wrote:
Who the hell is he throwing the ball too?

Ruben Randle has the most career receptions on our team.

Dion Sims. He'll block to help Massie- because god knows he needs it- and then catch it down the seam for a big 28 yard gain. Rare athlete.


I see Sims being the in-line TE for the majority of his snaps and Miller being spread out, flexed, etc as the move TE. Won't offset the lack of depth at WR but is the best we can do, plus maybe Miller can be a decent run blocker out wide.
_________________
2013 Kyle Long Rookie of the Year Award

Adopt a Bear - Kyle Long (Two Season Streak)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TankWilliams


Joined: 11 Dec 2007
Posts: 16896
Location: Chicago
PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2017 4:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mike Glennon - "I pride myself to be a smart guy"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bkokot


Joined: 23 Apr 2008
Posts: 3113
PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2017 4:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

TankWilliams wrote:
Mike Glennon - "I pride myself to be a smart guy"


Sig quote?
_________________
2016 Adopt-a-Bear
Alshon Jeffery

2013 Bears Forum Pick'em Champion
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
G08


Joined: 28 Feb 2011
Posts: 6477
Location: World Championsville
PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2017 4:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Iiiiii kind of have a feeling, dudes, that we aren't going to be drafting a QB in this draft... and if we do, it might be in round 4 or 5.
_________________
topwop1 wrote:
My point is you can find a franchise guy like [Derek] Carr in every draft

jrry32 wrote:
apples

When the defense allows 20 pts or fewer, the Cutler-led Bears were 36-7
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
topwop1


Joined: 08 Jan 2008
Posts: 7676
PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2017 4:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Interesting that Glennon mentioned in his presser that he's good friends with Eddie Royal and that he reached out to him before FA started and said a lot of nice things about the Bears.

Maybe Royal ends up staying and those release talks were a bit premature? I wouldn't rule it out with Jeffery being gone now.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ChicagoAl


Joined: 10 Jan 2008
Posts: 8416
PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2017 4:24 pm    Post subject: Re: Bears agree to terms with QB Mike Glennon Reply with quote

CBears019 wrote:


3yrs/$43.5m. $19m gtd
Exp: 4 years
Age: 27
Twitter: @Mike_Glennon

Career Stats:
Passing: 374/630. (59.4%)
Yards: 4100
TD/Int: 30/15
Fumbles: 9

Source:
Ian Rapoport:
Quote:
When Mike Glennon’s deal is finalized with #Bears, it’s expected to be 3 years for an average of $14.5M, source says. Will still draft a QB
The lunacy continues. I sold my PSLs and am so glad I did now I don't have to buy seasons tickets and watch this miserable collection.

Glennon??? Are you kidding me. He has no experience worth talking about yet they are paying him Cutler money. What a joke.

If the team wins more than three games I will be shocked. Of course, if they waste the third pick on a qb that will set them back even more than this Cutler move.

I have never been as uninterested in and uninvolved with the Bears.

This is great move for Cutler who can get away from this Clown College and sign with a team with a chance to win.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ChicagoAl


Joined: 10 Jan 2008
Posts: 8416
PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2017 4:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

TankWilliams wrote:
Willing to give him a shot. He's not the future, but him with a high pick rookie behind him given some time to develop could lead to success in the next couple season.
You are dreaming.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ChicagoAl


Joined: 10 Jan 2008
Posts: 8416
PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2017 4:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

topwop1 wrote:
Interesting that Glennon mentioned in his presser that he's good friends with Eddie Royal and that he reached out to him before FA started and said a lot of nice things about the Bears.

Maybe Royal ends up staying and those release talks were a bit premature? I wouldn't rule it out with Jeffery being gone now.
Royal cannot stay on the field so he had t go. He won't be back.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TankWilliams


Joined: 11 Dec 2007
Posts: 16896
Location: Chicago
PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2017 4:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ChicagoAl wrote:
TankWilliams wrote:
Willing to give him a shot. He's not the future, but him with a high pick rookie behind him given some time to develop could lead to success in the next couple season.
You are dreaming.


You are a meatball
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ChicagoAl


Joined: 10 Jan 2008
Posts: 8416
PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2017 5:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

TankWilliams wrote:
ChicagoAl wrote:
TankWilliams wrote:
Willing to give him a shot. He's not the future, but him with a high pick rookie behind him given some time to develop could lead to success in the next couple season.
You are dreaming.


You are a meatball
You are expecting the Bears to be able to develop a QB and I'M a meatball?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TankWilliams


Joined: 11 Dec 2007
Posts: 16896
Location: Chicago
PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2017 5:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ChicagoAl wrote:
TankWilliams wrote:
ChicagoAl wrote:
TankWilliams wrote:
Willing to give him a shot. He's not the future, but him with a high pick rookie behind him given some time to develop could lead to success in the next couple season.
You are dreaming.


You are a meatball
You are expecting the Bears to be able to develop a QB and I'M a meatball?


I'm expecting the Bears to at least try. At some point in this teams future, I'm sure that they will be able to do it. This team isn't inherently guaranteed to have bad QB play...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
G08


Joined: 28 Feb 2011
Posts: 6477
Location: World Championsville
PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2017 5:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

TankWilliams wrote:
ChicagoAl wrote:
TankWilliams wrote:
ChicagoAl wrote:
TankWilliams wrote:
Willing to give him a shot. He's not the future, but him with a high pick rookie behind him given some time to develop could lead to success in the next couple season.
You are dreaming.


You are a meatball
You are expecting the Bears to be able to develop a QB and I'M a meatball?


I'm expecting the Bears to at least try. At some point in this teams future, I'm sure that they will be able to do it. This team isn't inherently guaranteed to have bad QB play...


I think the fact that a QB will not be BPA at pick #3, and we left holes at CB, FS, and WR... I don't think I see a QB being selected before round 4.

I think round 1 is going to be a prospect with some juice to him (think Kevin White, Leonard Floyd)... Solomon Thomas makes a ton of sense there.

Round 2 will be the BPA out of WR/CB/FS

Round 3 will be BPA out of WR/CB/FS

Round 4 will lean toward QB and I think they are hoping Kaaya falls
_________________
topwop1 wrote:
My point is you can find a franchise guy like [Derek] Carr in every draft

jrry32 wrote:
apples

When the defense allows 20 pts or fewer, the Cutler-led Bears were 36-7
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TankWilliams


Joined: 11 Dec 2007
Posts: 16896
Location: Chicago
PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2017 5:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

G08 wrote:
TankWilliams wrote:
ChicagoAl wrote:
TankWilliams wrote:
ChicagoAl wrote:
TankWilliams wrote:
Willing to give him a shot. He's not the future, but him with a high pick rookie behind him given some time to develop could lead to success in the next couple season.
You are dreaming.


You are a meatball
You are expecting the Bears to be able to develop a QB and I'M a meatball?


I'm expecting the Bears to at least try. At some point in this teams future, I'm sure that they will be able to do it. This team isn't inherently guaranteed to have bad QB play...


I think the fact that a QB will not be BPA at pick #3, and we left holes at CB, FS, and WR... I don't think I see a QB being selected before round 4.

I think round 1 is going to be a prospect with some juice to him (think Kevin White, Leonard Floyd)... Solomon Thomas makes a ton of sense there.

Round 2 will be the BPA out of WR/CB/FS

Round 3 will be BPA out of WR/CB/FS

Round 4 will lean toward QB and I think they are hoping Kaaya falls


I'm thinking we are looking at a guy this year in round 2/3. Whether thats Mahomes, Peterman, or Webb, I do think they will take a guy in the top 3 rounds.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
IotaNet


Joined: 26 Jan 2013
Posts: 209
PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2017 5:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

TankWilliams wrote:
... You are a meatball
Man, that's cold.

You called him a Meatball to his face. Mr. Green
_________________
"From ‘Don’t Worry, Be Happy’ to a right cross to the mouth."
- Peter King on the difference between the Bears under Trestman vs. under John Fox
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
topwop1


Joined: 08 Jan 2008
Posts: 7676
PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2017 6:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

TankWilliams wrote:
G08 wrote:
TankWilliams wrote:
ChicagoAl wrote:
TankWilliams wrote:
ChicagoAl wrote:
TankWilliams wrote:
Willing to give him a shot. He's not the future, but him with a high pick rookie behind him given some time to develop could lead to success in the next couple season.
You are dreaming.


You are a meatball
You are expecting the Bears to be able to develop a QB and I'M a meatball?


I'm expecting the Bears to at least try. At some point in this teams future, I'm sure that they will be able to do it. This team isn't inherently guaranteed to have bad QB play...


I think the fact that a QB will not be BPA at pick #3, and we left holes at CB, FS, and WR... I don't think I see a QB being selected before round 4.

I think round 1 is going to be a prospect with some juice to him (think Kevin White, Leonard Floyd)... Solomon Thomas makes a ton of sense there.

Round 2 will be the BPA out of WR/CB/FS

Round 3 will be BPA out of WR/CB/FS

Round 4 will lean toward QB and I think they are hoping Kaaya falls


I'm thinking we are looking at a guy this year in round 2/3. Whether thats Mahomes, Peterman, or Webb, I do think they will take a guy in the top 3 rounds.


It's probably going to be Kaaya or Peterman, or Watson if he somehow falls.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Chicago Bears All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group