| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
WizardHawk
Joined: 31 Jan 2009
Posts: 15655
Location: Hawkeye State
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MKnight82
Joined: 04 Mar 2009
Posts: 19345
|
 Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2017 4:20 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| WizardHawk wrote: | http://www.bloggingtheboys.com/2017/1/23/14345838/understanding-tony-romos-contract-trade-release-cut-backup-dallas-cowboys-dak-prescott-salary-cap
Good breakdown of Romo's contract |
That writer seems confused. He talks about how the critical number for Romo's contract is the $14 mil base salary for this year and how if they trade/cut him they won't have to pay that. While that's true, he then turns around and compares that $14 mil base salary to the cap hits for six players on your roster this year. Cutting or trading Romo won't save the Cowboys $14 mil in cap space (unless they cut him post June 1st), it will only save Jerry from having to pay that $14 mil to Romo. How it works cap wise is different from the actual money being paid out though. Romo's prorated bonus for 2017, 2018 & 2019 must be accounted for. So cutting or trading Romo only saves the Cowboys $5.1 mil if he's cut pre June 1st, or they can spread it out and cut him Post June 1st, then they save $14 mil. There's no way to trade Romo and get $14 mil in cap space.
_________________
Bruce Allen is a snake and should be fired. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Action Jackson
Joined: 30 Sep 2014
Posts: 3094
Location: Ft.Worth, Texas
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 8:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
No because if the Texans are willing to trade Watt something is wrong with him. If he will be fine then no chance in hell the Texans trade the best defensive player in the NFL who is in his prime. The Texans will be able to get Romo without giving Watt away if they want Romo.
_________________
EL ramster on the sig! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sodakcowboy78
Joined: 18 Jan 2012
Posts: 905
Location: sioux falls so dak
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2017 1:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Why wouldnt the Texans go for Romo and a 1st for Watt? They too have a window...throw in a Romo for a couple years with that D and good WR core and a decent running game and it makes too much sense...that is prob why it wont happen...because it makes too much sense...both teams can re-neg both contracts to be more cap friendly.
Peace |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
blankman0021
Joined: 02 May 2007
Posts: 2752
Location: MKE
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 03, 2017 4:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| sodakcowboy78 wrote: | Why wouldnt the Texans go for Romo and a 1st for Watt? They too have a window...throw in a Romo for a couple years with that D and good WR core and a decent running game and it makes too much sense...that is prob why it wont happen...because it makes too much sense...both teams can re-neg both contracts to be more cap friendly.
Peace |
This trade makes zero sense.
As it is right now...
Texans Receive:
-Romo at 54M/3yr salary.
-Low 1st round pick
-Salary cap penalty of 20.M dollars in 2017.
Cowboys Receive:
-Watt at 67.5M/5yr salary.
-Salary cap savings of 5.1M in 2017.
I think we can put this to rest based on that 20M cap hit the texans would take. Even if you do a post June 1 trade it ends up being 14.5M in 2017 with the rest prorated to 2018. Just won't happen for an old QB. It's Romo we're talking about here, not Tom Brady.
_________________
| The Doctor wrote: | | ALLONS-Y, ALONSO! |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TD-ES-JJ
Joined: 25 Feb 2005
Posts: 2144
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2017 3:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| So if so many teams want Romo, how is it that he has no apparent trade value? I'm not buying it. I'm thinking we'll get at least a 2nd rd pick for Tony if JJ holds on to him and doesn't do something stupid. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
WizardHawk
Joined: 31 Jan 2009
Posts: 15655
Location: Hawkeye State
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2017 4:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| TD-ES-JJ wrote: | | So if so many teams want Romo, how is it that he has no apparent trade value? I'm not buying it. I'm thinking we'll get at least a 2nd rd pick for Tony if JJ holds on to him and doesn't do something stupid. |
Teams want Romo. That isn't even debatable, imo. Houston, Denver, KC...I have zero doubt they want him. They don't want to trade for him which is the crux here.
It's probably best for Dallas to play hard ball with Romo and teams interested in him. Either he's traded. Or, he's the best compensated backup in NFL history. Problem there is, Jerry won't do that to Romo.
_________________
Kiltman on the sig & avy |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TD-ES-JJ
Joined: 25 Feb 2005
Posts: 2144
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2017 4:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| WizardHawk wrote: | | TD-ES-JJ wrote: | | So if so many teams want Romo, how is it that he has no apparent trade value? I'm not buying it. I'm thinking we'll get at least a 2nd rd pick for Tony if JJ holds on to him and doesn't do something stupid. |
Teams want Romo. That isn't even debatable, imo. Houston, Denver, KC...I have zero doubt they want him. They don't want to trade for him which is the crux here.
It's probably best for Dallas to play hard ball with Romo and teams interested in him. Either he's traded. Or, he's the best compensated backup in NFL history. Problem there is, Jerry won't do that to Romo. |
I agree...I think they should hold on to him until someone makes an offer. I, however, don't feel that we are doing anything bad to him. He has been more than compensated for our right to hold on to him until someone makes a reasonable offer. He has close to $20mil in his bank account that he hasn't earned yet.
I wouldn't let him go for anything less than a 2. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DaBoys
Joined: 18 Feb 2005
Posts: 8290
Location: Not a fan of Linehan.
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2017 4:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| TD-ES-JJ wrote: | | WizardHawk wrote: | | TD-ES-JJ wrote: | | So if so many teams want Romo, how is it that he has no apparent trade value? I'm not buying it. I'm thinking we'll get at least a 2nd rd pick for Tony if JJ holds on to him and doesn't do something stupid. |
Teams want Romo. That isn't even debatable, imo. Houston, Denver, KC...I have zero doubt they want him. They don't want to trade for him which is the crux here.
It's probably best for Dallas to play hard ball with Romo and teams interested in him. Either he's traded. Or, he's the best compensated backup in NFL history. Problem there is, Jerry won't do that to Romo. |
I agree...I think they should hold on to him until someone makes an offer. I, however, don't feel that we are doing anything bad to him. He has been more than compensated for our right to hold on to him until someone makes a reasonable offer. He has close to $20mil in his bank account that he hasn't earned yet.
I wouldn't let him go for anything less than a 2. |
My thoughts exactly. We paid good money, and will continue to pay, to be able to do whatever the hell we want with him. We don't owe him anything. I don't feel sorry for Tony Romo. The guy is unimaginably rich, good looking, has a beautiful wife, a mansion, and kids. He signed the contract too. Surely he understands the business side of football as well.
And if we are "nice" to Tony and let him walk for nothing, it's going to hurt real bad when he beats us with his handpicked team. We need to do what BB did with Jamie Collins and send Romo to the Browns for a 4th. Done. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CowboysFan96
Joined: 18 Mar 2015
Posts: 51
Location: New York, NY
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2017 9:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| DaBoys wrote: | | TD-ES-JJ wrote: | | WizardHawk wrote: | | TD-ES-JJ wrote: | | So if so many teams want Romo, how is it that he has no apparent trade value? I'm not buying it. I'm thinking we'll get at least a 2nd rd pick for Tony if JJ holds on to him and doesn't do something stupid. |
Teams want Romo. That isn't even debatable, imo. Houston, Denver, KC...I have zero doubt they want him. They don't want to trade for him which is the crux here.
It's probably best for Dallas to play hard ball with Romo and teams interested in him. Either he's traded. Or, he's the best compensated backup in NFL history. Problem there is, Jerry won't do that to Romo. |
I agree...I think they should hold on to him until someone makes an offer. I, however, don't feel that we are doing anything bad to him. He has been more than compensated for our right to hold on to him until someone makes a reasonable offer. He has close to $20mil in his bank account that he hasn't earned yet.
I wouldn't let him go for anything less than a 2. |
My thoughts exactly. We paid good money, and will continue to pay, to be able to do whatever the hell we want with him. We don't owe him anything. I don't feel sorry for Tony Romo. The guy is unimaginably rich, good looking, has a beautiful wife, a mansion, and kids. He signed the contract too. Surely he understands the business side of football as well.
And if we are "nice" to Tony and let him walk for nothing, it's going to hurt real bad when he beats us with his handpicked team. We need to do what BB did with Jamie Collins and send Romo to the Browns for a 4th. Done. |
I agree with this 100% |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TD-ES-JJ
Joined: 25 Feb 2005
Posts: 2144
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2017 10:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| DaBoys wrote: | | TD-ES-JJ wrote: | | WizardHawk wrote: | | TD-ES-JJ wrote: | | So if so many teams want Romo, how is it that he has no apparent trade value? I'm not buying it. I'm thinking we'll get at least a 2nd rd pick for Tony if JJ holds on to him and doesn't do something stupid. |
Teams want Romo. That isn't even debatable, imo. Houston, Denver, KC...I have zero doubt they want him. They don't want to trade for him which is the crux here.
It's probably best for Dallas to play hard ball with Romo and teams interested in him. Either he's traded. Or, he's the best compensated backup in NFL history. Problem there is, Jerry won't do that to Romo. |
I agree...I think they should hold on to him until someone makes an offer. I, however, don't feel that we are doing anything bad to him. He has been more than compensated for our right to hold on to him until someone makes a reasonable offer. He has close to $20mil in his bank account that he hasn't earned yet.
I wouldn't let him go for anything less than a 2. |
My thoughts exactly. We paid good money, and will continue to pay, to be able to do whatever the hell we want with him. We don't owe him anything. I don't feel sorry for Tony Romo. The guy is unimaginably rich, good looking, has a beautiful wife, a mansion, and kids. He signed the contract too. Surely he understands the business side of football as well.
And if we are "nice" to Tony and let him walk for nothing, it's going to hurt real bad when he beats us with his handpicked team. We need to do what BB did with Jamie Collins and send Romo to the Browns for a 4th. Done. |
I think we could get at least a 2 from Cle and I don't care how Tony "feels" about it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CT Cowboy Fan
Joined: 12 Mar 2011
Posts: 1307
Location: Connecticut
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2017 11:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Two of the rumored teams that want Romo are KC and Denver, division rivals. Why not leak that one of them offered a 2nd round pick and then let the bidding begin. One of the two might get antsy and actually offer something because they don't want their division foe getting Romo. A healthy Romo put either of those two teams over the top in the division and an instant contender in the conference.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
resilient
Joined: 07 Jan 2013
Posts: 4682
Location: where old school ballers go to die
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2017 12:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| CT Cowboy Fan wrote: | | Two of the rumored teams that want Romo are KC and Denver, division rivals. Why not leak that one of them offered a 2nd round pick and then let the bidding begin. One of the two might get antsy and actually offer something because they don't want their division foe getting Romo. A healthy Romo put either of those two teams over the top in the division and an instant contender in the conference. |
as I said already, any bidding WAR helps drive up the price tag. I am wondering though will teams be more interested before or after the draft?
_________________
it's not the SKILL of a man, but the WILL of a man. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cowboyfanin2890
Joined: 12 Feb 2012
Posts: 1872
Location: Hayesville NC
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2017 2:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| resilient wrote: | | CT Cowboy Fan wrote: | | Two of the rumored teams that want Romo are KC and Denver, division rivals. Why not leak that one of them offered a 2nd round pick and then let the bidding begin. One of the two might get antsy and actually offer something because they don't want their division foe getting Romo. A healthy Romo put either of those two teams over the top in the division and an instant contender in the conference. |
as I said already, any bidding WAR helps drive up the price tag. I am wondering though will teams be more interested before or after the draft? |
I think if either of these 2 teams was interested it would happen sooner rather than later. KC needs a QB of the future but they have a team built to win now and Denver has young QB's but their defense is dominant. I think KC would be a great choice for Romo to play out his remaining years.
_________________
Thanks to Uncle Buck on the sig |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
