View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
daintrain28 

Joined: 04 Feb 2005 Posts: 19897 Location: Bettendorf, Iowa
|
Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2017 10:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
DocHambone wrote: | Perry will not be cheap... |
I guess we'll have to agree to disagree. I know he's had his best year, I just don't see teams spending big time money on him. Not saying he's going to sign for the vet minimum or anything, but I do think he'll be affordable. _________________
Thanks packerbacker87 for the sig! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
NormSizedMidget 
Joined: 28 Mar 2011 Posts: 17912
|
Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2017 11:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
daintrain28 wrote: | DocHambone wrote: | Perry will not be cheap... |
I guess we'll have to agree to disagree. I know he's had his best year, I just don't see teams spending big time money on him. Not saying he's going to sign for the vet minimum or anything, but I do think he'll be affordable. |
Define affordable. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
daintrain28 

Joined: 04 Feb 2005 Posts: 19897 Location: Bettendorf, Iowa
|
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 12:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
NormSizedMidget wrote: | daintrain28 wrote: | DocHambone wrote: | Perry will not be cheap... |
I guess we'll have to agree to disagree. I know he's had his best year, I just don't see teams spending big time money on him. Not saying he's going to sign for the vet minimum or anything, but I do think he'll be affordable. |
Define affordable. |
Somewhere in the vicinity of his yearly salary now, just spread out over a few years... _________________
Thanks packerbacker87 for the sig! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
NormSizedMidget 
Joined: 28 Mar 2011 Posts: 17912
|
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 12:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
daintrain28 wrote: | NormSizedMidget wrote: | daintrain28 wrote: | DocHambone wrote: | Perry will not be cheap... |
I guess we'll have to agree to disagree. I know he's had his best year, I just don't see teams spending big time money on him. Not saying he's going to sign for the vet minimum or anything, but I do think he'll be affordable. |
Define affordable. |
Somewhere in the vicinity of his yearly salary now, just spread out over a few years... |
That was like 5? I think he'll get more than that myself. I hope so! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Cadmus 
Joined: 22 Apr 2013 Posts: 2351
|
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 12:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
NormSizedMidget wrote: | daintrain28 wrote: | NormSizedMidget wrote: | daintrain28 wrote: | DocHambone wrote: | Perry will not be cheap... |
I guess we'll have to agree to disagree. I know he's had his best year, I just don't see teams spending big time money on him. Not saying he's going to sign for the vet minimum or anything, but I do think he'll be affordable. |
Define affordable. |
Somewhere in the vicinity of his yearly salary now, just spread out over a few years... |
That was like 5? I think he'll get more than that myself. I hope so! |
Not a snowball's chance in hell Perry will be re-signed at 5 per.
Nick Perry had the 4th highest sack rate (per game played) in the NFL this season.
Would you like to know the 3 names above him? Hint: It doesn't include Chandler Jones.
Von Miller. Vic Beasley. Joey Bosa.
We're looking at an 8-10 average for Perry on a 4 year deal. It could very well be closer to the high end of that because the Packers aren't going to let him leave. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
NormSizedMidget 
Joined: 28 Mar 2011 Posts: 17912
|
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 1:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Cadmus wrote: | NormSizedMidget wrote: | daintrain28 wrote: | NormSizedMidget wrote: | daintrain28 wrote: | DocHambone wrote: | Perry will not be cheap... |
I guess we'll have to agree to disagree. I know he's had his best year, I just don't see teams spending big time money on him. Not saying he's going to sign for the vet minimum or anything, but I do think he'll be affordable. |
Define affordable. |
Somewhere in the vicinity of his yearly salary now, just spread out over a few years... |
That was like 5? I think he'll get more than that myself. I hope so! |
Not a snowball's chance in hell Perry will be re-signed at 5 per.
Nick Perry had the 4th highest sack rate (per game played) in the NFL this season.
Would you like to know the 3 names above him? Hint: It doesn't include Chandler Jones.
Von Miller. Vic Beasley. Joey Bosa.
We're looking at an 8-10 average for Perry on a 4 year deal. It could very well be closer to the high end of that because the Packers aren't going to let him leave. |
Deja vu
I was trying to be nice. He's not going to be cheap.
That being said ill take the flier on Jones. Which is the most extreme opinion I'll have all year |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Cadmus 
Joined: 22 Apr 2013 Posts: 2351
|
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 1:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
NormSizedMidget wrote: |
Deja vu
I was trying to be nice. He's not going to be cheap.
That being said ill take the flier on Jones. Which is the most extreme opinion I'll have all year |
Damn, I need to ease up then.
I don't want to become the new Norm.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
vegas492
Joined: 30 Oct 2012 Posts: 1510 Location: Pewaukee, Wisconsin
|
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 10:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Arizona has stated that they will franchise Chandler Jones. Doubtful that he hits free agency. That's the bad news. The good new is that their monster DT, Calais Campell, should hit free agency. Stuffs the run and gets sacks, and is just 30.
Perry will be a minimum of $7M year in my book, and given that my book is typically 33% under where contracts come in, that would mean he will be closer to $9M.
If Lang comes back, that's a lot of coin, too.
As far as the draft picks? I don't like the first round kid. More of an athlete right now than a corner. Betting on the upside is fine, but I'd rather not do it in the first round. There will be better corners and better overall players there.
But, I love reading stuff like this, thanks for the thoughts! _________________ From my perspective, and I don't know if Brett would say this [publicly] -- I know he's shared with me -- we would not be nearly as appreciative of everything that the Packers are had we not seen it from the other side," ---Ryan Longwell 2016 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
HorizontoZenith
Joined: 03 Mar 2016 Posts: 5911
|
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 11:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
^Yes, I prefer giving free agent contracts out to "over the hill" veterans hungry for a ring that won't get that "only 25-27" free agent money.
We have had incredible returns on those third contract type players. Peppers, Cook, Woodson, Pickett... No reason to deviate away from what's worked. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
vegas492
Joined: 30 Oct 2012 Posts: 1510 Location: Pewaukee, Wisconsin
|
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 12:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
HorizontoZenith wrote: | ^Yes, I prefer giving free agent contracts out to "over the hill" veterans hungry for a ring that won't get that "only 25-27" free agent money.
We have had incredible returns on those third contract type players. Peppers, Cook, Woodson, Pickett... No reason to deviate away from what's worked. |
Gotta be the right kind of person and player. Campbell kind of fits that. But, given his production, I think he is going to get some serious money... if he hits the market. But dang, it is fun to dream. _________________ From my perspective, and I don't know if Brett would say this [publicly] -- I know he's shared with me -- we would not be nearly as appreciative of everything that the Packers are had we not seen it from the other side," ---Ryan Longwell 2016 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
daintrain28 

Joined: 04 Feb 2005 Posts: 19897 Location: Bettendorf, Iowa
|
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 12:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Alright guys, point taken on Perry and Chandler Jones. As it relates to Perry, I greatly undervalued his production and I acknowledge that. He likely will replace Peppers as the starter opposite CM3.
I guess as it relates to Chandler Jones, I'm of the opinion that as close as this team is to winning another championship, it'd be wise to invest in FA to get us "over the hump." While I have been a HUGE TT fan, one thing that excites me about a John Dorsey or Elliott Wolf talking over is that we likely are going to start seeing some of these dips into the FA market.
Jones was my thought as that guy, those are probably right it is a pipedream. I do think we'll see a little bit of these dips with the new regime. Just MO. _________________
Thanks packerbacker87 for the sig! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
daintrain28 

Joined: 04 Feb 2005 Posts: 19897 Location: Bettendorf, Iowa
|
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 1:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Also, as it relates to Adoree Jackson, that's about as good as it gets at #32. This is a top 10 pick who is going to drop, and that late I dunno if you are going to find a better option.
Jackson would play the slot (which is where Sam Shields played). Those receivers are typically smaller, faster and shifter. It's a rare skill set to be able to match up on the Wes Welker or Randall Dobbs of the world and I think Jackson is one of the few who could handle it, he may be the most athletic CB prospect in the entire draft and unlike most CBs that are this quick he is not lacking height.
Think a more playmaking version of Sam Shields... _________________
Thanks packerbacker87 for the sig! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
CWood21
 Joined: 27 Jun 2008 Posts: 49485 Location: mike23md on the dope sig
|
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 1:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
daintrain28 wrote: | Alright guys, point taken on Perry and Chandler Jones. As it relates to Perry, I greatly undervalued his production and I acknowledge that. He likely will replace Peppers as the starter opposite CM3. |
He's already the starter opposite of Clay. In fact, the only LB who played a higher percent of the defensive snaps was Joe Thomas. He's gonna get paid, a ton too. _________________
PackFan4Life wrote: | I have been pooping like a unicorn for two days and it is freaky. |
bkobow05 wrote: | So this is what DCR feels like on Saturdays... |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
vegas492
Joined: 30 Oct 2012 Posts: 1510 Location: Pewaukee, Wisconsin
|
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 2:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
daintrain28 wrote: | Also, as it relates to Adoree Jackson, that's about as good as it gets at #32. This is a top 10 pick who is going to drop, and that late I dunno if you are going to find a better option.
Jackson would play the slot (which is where Sam Shields played). Those receivers are typically smaller, faster and shifter. It's a rare skill set to be able to match up on the Wes Welker or Randall Dobbs of the world and I think Jackson is one of the few who could handle it, he may be the most athletic CB prospect in the entire draft and unlike most CBs that are this quick he is not lacking height.
Think a more playmaking version of Sam Shields... |
Shields wasn't a slot corner. He was the boundary corner on the defense's right side, offense's left side. Sometimes he would shadow the best receiver, but in no way was he a slot corner.
You are right, though, that Jackson has elite measureables. I'm just not certain that he is a good corner yet. His athletic traits are there, but there will be better corners taken after him...at least to start. _________________ From my perspective, and I don't know if Brett would say this [publicly] -- I know he's shared with me -- we would not be nearly as appreciative of everything that the Packers are had we not seen it from the other side," ---Ryan Longwell 2016 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
daintrain28 

Joined: 04 Feb 2005 Posts: 19897 Location: Bettendorf, Iowa
|
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 3:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
vegas492 wrote: | daintrain28 wrote: | Also, as it relates to Adoree Jackson, that's about as good as it gets at #32. This is a top 10 pick who is going to drop, and that late I dunno if you are going to find a better option.
Jackson would play the slot (which is where Sam Shields played). Those receivers are typically smaller, faster and shifter. It's a rare skill set to be able to match up on the Wes Welker or Randall Dobbs of the world and I think Jackson is one of the few who could handle it, he may be the most athletic CB prospect in the entire draft and unlike most CBs that are this quick he is not lacking height.
Think a more playmaking version of Sam Shields... |
Shields wasn't a slot corner. He was the boundary corner on the defense's right side, offense's left side. Sometimes he would shadow the best receiver, but in no way was he a slot corner.
You are right, though, that Jackson has elite measureables. I'm just not certain that he is a good corner yet. His athletic traits are there, but there will be better corners taken after him...at least to start. |
Well, first of all, GB has in the past taken prospects that needed time to reach their ceiling. But secondly, I'd like to know who specifically you think taken later will be better.
Once again, this is a top 10 pick that is going to fall. If anything, you could say I'm being unrealistic about him falling all the way to #32. _________________
Thanks packerbacker87 for the sig! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|