We are transitioning to a new forum software platform. Your current password will not work after August 12th. Update the email in your profile so you are not locked out. Click here for more information.
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
buno67
Joined: 15 Mar 2007
Posts: 40997
|
 Posted: Wed Mar 01, 2017 11:02 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| IDOG_det wrote: | | I opened the video up in quick time to measure it. It's hard to tell what the full 40 is because you can't see the finish line, but I stopped it when they stopped it and also got 4.33 for his 40. I also got 1.55 for his first 10 and 2.62 for his first 20. |
Zeke last year at the combine ran those splits. His 10 was 1.58 and his 20 was 2.62. he ended up running a 4.47 40.
So I don't know about that 4.33 speed or your timing ability lol |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
IDOG_det
Joined: 02 Mar 2009
Posts: 36886
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 01, 2017 11:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| buno67 wrote: | | IDOG_det wrote: | | I opened the video up in quick time to measure it. It's hard to tell what the full 40 is because you can't see the finish line, but I stopped it when they stopped it and also got 4.33 for his 40. I also got 1.55 for his first 10 and 2.62 for his first 20. |
Zeke last year at the combine ran those splits. His 10 was 1.58 and his 20 was 2.62. he ended up running a 4.47 40.
So I don't know about that 4.33 speed or your timing ability lol |
I'm not hand timing it. I scroll through the frames and stop the video the moment he lifts up his hand (that's when the run officially starts). I mark that point in the video (0.64 seconds into the video in this case) and then subtract that time from the point in the video where he finishes the run or when he gets to 10 yards, 20 yards, etc. to find how fast he ran. The only way this method can be incorrect is if you start it at the wrong time, end it at the wrong time, or if frames are removed from the video (I didn't notice any). There can also be a small standard deviation depending on the frame rate of the video.
_________________
"Strength is meaningless in o-line play if there is no explosive, or speed-strength, quality to the strength."
- LeCharles Bentley
R.I.P. Stylish |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
VanS
Joined: 21 Apr 2016
Posts: 353
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 02, 2017 4:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Danger wrote: | Reportedly ran a 4.33.
Kid has ample size at 5'11" 233 and good agility to boot. Complete package in my opinion. Sometimes he does struggle if the opposing defense puts 8 in the box. |
I doubt he has that sort of speed. Barkley looks more like a high 4.4/low 4.5 guy. But what he lacks in blazing speed, he more than makes up for in terms of power, vision, agility, and acceleration.
Best RB prospect I've seen since Adrian Peterson. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MrOaktown_56
Joined: 15 Dec 2013
Posts: 8095
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 02, 2017 5:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
[quote="VanS"] | Danger wrote: | Reportedly ran a 4.33.
Kid has ample size at 5'11" 233 and good agility to boot. Complete package in my opinion. Sometimes he does struggle if the opposing defense puts 8 in the box. |
I doubt he has that sort of speed. Barkley looks more like a high 4.4/low 4.5 guy. But what he lacks in blazing speed, he more than makes up for in terms of power, vision, agility, and acceleration.
Best RB prospect I've seen since Adrian Peterson.[/quote]
Maybe not that far, but Barkley is better than zeke as a prospect IMO.
_________________
| Danand wrote: | | Carr is 22-25,no playoff games, I'd take Flacco over him.To me it seems like Flacco is just where he belongs. Behind the Brady, Roethlisberger,Rivers,Rodgers,Wilson and ahead of Carr,Tannehill,Cousins,Palmer,Dalton,Luck |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
buno67
Joined: 15 Mar 2007
Posts: 40997
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 02, 2017 7:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| IDOG_det wrote: | | buno67 wrote: | | IDOG_det wrote: | | I opened the video up in quick time to measure it. It's hard to tell what the full 40 is because you can't see the finish line, but I stopped it when they stopped it and also got 4.33 for his 40. I also got 1.55 for his first 10 and 2.62 for his first 20. |
Zeke last year at the combine ran those splits. His 10 was 1.58 and his 20 was 2.62. he ended up running a 4.47 40.
So I don't know about that 4.33 speed or your timing ability lol |
I'm not hand timing it. I scroll through the frames and stop the video the moment he lifts up his hand (that's when the run officially starts). I mark that point in the video (0.64 seconds into the video in this case) and then subtract that time from the point in the video where he finishes the run or when he gets to 10 yards, 20 yards, etc. to find how fast he ran. The only way this method can be incorrect is if you start it at the wrong time, end it at the wrong time, or if frames are removed from the video (I didn't notice any). There can also be a small standard deviation depending on the frame rate of the video. |
Im just saying. One of those things arent the same. Just saying he really didnt run a 4.3 40 or he has some godly gear that he got even faster at the 25/30 mark. Also prolly doesnt help in the video you dont see him cross the line. That could be a difference but who knows |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
IDOG_det
Joined: 02 Mar 2009
Posts: 36886
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 02, 2017 10:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| buno67 wrote: | | IDOG_det wrote: | | buno67 wrote: | | IDOG_det wrote: | | I opened the video up in quick time to measure it. It's hard to tell what the full 40 is because you can't see the finish line, but I stopped it when they stopped it and also got 4.33 for his 40. I also got 1.55 for his first 10 and 2.62 for his first 20. |
Zeke last year at the combine ran those splits. His 10 was 1.58 and his 20 was 2.62. he ended up running a 4.47 40.
So I don't know about that 4.33 speed or your timing ability lol |
I'm not hand timing it. I scroll through the frames and stop the video the moment he lifts up his hand (that's when the run officially starts). I mark that point in the video (0.64 seconds into the video in this case) and then subtract that time from the point in the video where he finishes the run or when he gets to 10 yards, 20 yards, etc. to find how fast he ran. The only way this method can be incorrect is if you start it at the wrong time, end it at the wrong time, or if frames are removed from the video (I didn't notice any). There can also be a small standard deviation depending on the frame rate of the video. |
Im just saying. One of those things arent the same. Just saying he really didnt run a 4.3 40 or he has some godly gear that he got even faster at the 25/30 mark. Also prolly doesnt help in the video you dont see him cross the line. That could be a difference but who knows |
It's possible the frame rate was off as well. Not a perfect science.
_________________
"Strength is meaningless in o-line play if there is no explosive, or speed-strength, quality to the strength."
- LeCharles Bentley
R.I.P. Stylish |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
