Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

Rams have 4 Top-50 (4-3) DE's

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> St. Louis Rams
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
stl_rams_fan


Joined: 10 Nov 2013
Posts: 147
PostPosted: Thu Mar 27, 2014 11:35 pm    Post subject: Rams have 4 Top-50 (4-3) DE's Reply with quote

I was on Bleacher Report and saw the newest post to their "NFL 1000 series" it ranks X amount of players at every position until they reach 1000 players

Here is BP's list of the NFL's top 50 4-3 Defensive ends:

#39 - Eugene Sims (overall - 74)
#20 - William Hayes (overall - 81)
#14 - Chris Long (overall - 81)
#1 - Robert Quinn (overall - 94 Very Happy )


pretty cool for a team to have their 2 backups in the top 50 of the position
_________________
Go Rams!


Last edited by stl_rams_fan on Mon Mar 31, 2014 2:25 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Flatlyner


Joined: 06 Feb 2006
Posts: 5960
Location: WESTCOAST
PostPosted: Fri Mar 28, 2014 1:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes, not bad at all. Imagine adding Clowney to that list. Booyah!
_________________
WELCOME TO THE RAMS:
Greg Robinson
Aaron Donald
Lamarcus Joyner
Tre Mason
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ray


Joined: 16 Nov 2007
Posts: 560
PostPosted: Fri Mar 28, 2014 2:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

That Defense is going to be scary, Clowney or not
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
RamRod


Joined: 25 Feb 2007
Posts: 9291
Location: Virginia
PostPosted: Fri Mar 28, 2014 9:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The title of the thread is definitely misleading as its only a ranking of 4-3 DEs.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
jjab360


Joined: 31 Dec 2008
Posts: 3983
Location: On Top
PostPosted: Fri Mar 28, 2014 10:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

RamRod wrote:
The title of the thread is definitely misleading as its only a ranking of 4-3 DEs.

I really don't know if I'd classify that as misleading, tbh.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Golden_Knight5


Joined: 21 Mar 2008
Posts: 162
PostPosted: Fri Mar 28, 2014 10:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

quinn should be 100
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Golden_Knight5


Joined: 21 Mar 2008
Posts: 162
PostPosted: Fri Mar 28, 2014 10:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Golden_Knight5 wrote:
quinn should be 100


as in 100 million (in a year or two)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
zn


Joined: 28 Feb 2014
Posts: 62
PostPosted: Sat Mar 29, 2014 8:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Golden_Knight5 wrote:
Golden_Knight5 wrote:
quinn should be 100


as in 100 million (in a year or two)


And that IS what it will be, give or take (though mostly give).

...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RamRod


Joined: 25 Feb 2007
Posts: 9291
Location: Virginia
PostPosted: Sat Mar 29, 2014 5:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

jjab360 wrote:
RamRod wrote:
The title of the thread is definitely misleading as its only a ranking of 4-3 DEs.

I really don't know if I'd classify that as misleading, tbh.


I think it kinda is. If you factor in 3-4 DEs, we probably only have two in the top 50.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
jjab360


Joined: 31 Dec 2008
Posts: 3983
Location: On Top
PostPosted: Sat Mar 29, 2014 9:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

RamRod wrote:
jjab360 wrote:
RamRod wrote:
The title of the thread is definitely misleading as its only a ranking of 4-3 DEs.

I really don't know if I'd classify that as misleading, tbh.


I think it kinda is. If you factor in 3-4 DEs, we probably only have two in the top 50.

If the title was something like "Rams have 4 top 50 players", that'd be misleading because that's not the same as the content. As it is now, it's really just a matter of semantics, imo.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> St. Louis Rams All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group