| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
bwall
Joined: 18 Dec 2008
Posts: 190
Location: Boulder
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
KC_Broncos_Fan
Joined: 24 Jul 2013
Posts: 260
|
 Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2014 9:42 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| I think it's a lock that the pick will be an inside linebacker or guard in the first round. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
maverick9305
Joined: 26 Dec 2009
Posts: 358
Location: ATX
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2014 9:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Hope we didn't overpay him but I like the pickup. Sets us up pretty well at WR for the year.
Honestly I'm less concerned about the OLine. I think if we shift around Clark and Franklin we'd be pretty well set barring injuries for the year. I still think LB and CB are things that need to be addressed still before the start of the next season. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
KingBishop
Joined: 29 Dec 2013
Posts: 3373
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2014 10:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Bring him on and still draft a WR in the first three rounds gives us a five of
Thomas
Welker
Sanders
Caldwell
Rookie
_________________
Props to Joe_Is_The_Best |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mke1010
Joined: 08 Mar 2008
Posts: 1987
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2014 10:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
With this signing my top four picks would go like this or vary slightly depending on best player avail........
1st Round:Guard
2nd:Corner
3rd: MLB
4th: Receiver |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
KingBishop
Joined: 29 Dec 2013
Posts: 3373
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2014 10:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
We trade out 1st and 4th to move up for Mosley take a G and CB in rounds 2 and 3 use a fifth and a sixth to move up for a WR and use the 7th on whatever position we need depth
_________________
Props to Joe_Is_The_Best |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
thebestever6
Joined: 03 Jan 2008
Posts: 2324
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 16, 2014 12:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
I'm thinking a for sure trade up now. I'll be mad if it's the same money decker got.
_________________
Props to Deadpulse for the Sig:
Big Palooka wrote:
"They don't have to worry about him making consistent passes. They will win another 2-3 max with him at QB." |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kylecumberland
Joined: 04 Feb 2008
Posts: 1162
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 16, 2014 12:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Just so you guys know...he agreed in principle on a deal with KC. handshake and everything. then after that his agent called john elway and told him. then elway signed him.... you bronco fans are cool, but John elway is the most manipulative cheating troll i have ever seen. Roger Goodell needs to address this. Yes the agent should be banned, but more needs to be done. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Rh61791
Joined: 03 Jan 2013
Posts: 59
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 16, 2014 1:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| kylecumberland wrote: | | Just so you guys know...he agreed in principle on a deal with KC. handshake and everything. then after that his agent called john elway and told him. then elway signed him.... you bronco fans are cool, but John elway is the most manipulative cheating troll i have ever seen. Roger Goodell needs to address this. Yes the agent should be banned, but more needs to be done. |
I guarantee you the agent never told Elway or the Bucs that they had a verbal agreement with the Chiefs. A verbal agreement doesn't mean much anyways. A FA is still available until he has signed a contract. Since he didn't the Broncos did nothing wrong. Move along now troll. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mke1010
Joined: 08 Mar 2008
Posts: 1987
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 16, 2014 1:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| kylecumberland wrote: | | Just so you guys know...he agreed in principle on a deal with KC. handshake and everything. then after that his agent called john elway and told him. then elway signed him.... you bronco fans are cool, but John elway is the most manipulative cheating troll i have ever seen. Roger Goodell needs to address this. Yes the agent should be banned, but more needs to be done. |
It didn't go down exactly the way you claim. While the agent may fall short of ethical norms per contract negotiations- he broke no explicit NFL rule.
The Chiefs can push for new rules regarding negotiations if they feel so aggrieved. Bottom line is your anger should be directed at Sanders's agent not Elway. John, and the Broncos, did nothing wrong. In fact, I believe the Broncos were one of the last teams contacted by the agent.
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap2000000334409/article/executives-crying-foul-over-emmanuel-sanders-deal
Last edited by mke1010 on Sun Mar 16, 2014 1:30 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kylecumberland
Joined: 04 Feb 2008
Posts: 1162
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 16, 2014 1:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| mke1010 wrote: | | kylecumberland wrote: | | Just so you guys know...he agreed in principle on a deal with KC. handshake and everything. then after that his agent called john elway and told him. then elway signed him.... you bronco fans are cool, but John elway is the most manipulative cheating troll i have ever seen. Roger Goodell needs to address this. Yes the agent should be banned, but more needs to be done. |
It didn't go down exactly the way you claim. While the agent may fall short of ethical norms per contract negotiations- he broke no explicit NFL rule.
The Chiefs can push for new rules regarding negotiations if they feel so aggrieved. Bottom line is your anger should be directed at Sanders's agent not Elway. John, and the Broncos, did nothing wrong. In fact, the Broncos were one of the last teams contacted by the agent.
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap2000000334409/article/executives-crying-foul-over-emmanuel-sanders-deal |
but the deal should still be vetoed by goodell. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Rh61791
Joined: 03 Jan 2013
Posts: 59
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 16, 2014 1:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| kylecumberland wrote: | | mke1010 wrote: | | kylecumberland wrote: | | Just so you guys know...he agreed in principle on a deal with KC. handshake and everything. then after that his agent called john elway and told him. then elway signed him.... you bronco fans are cool, but John elway is the most manipulative cheating troll i have ever seen. Roger Goodell needs to address this. Yes the agent should be banned, but more needs to be done. |
It didn't go down exactly the way you claim. While the agent may fall short of ethical norms per contract negotiations- he broke no explicit NFL rule.
The Chiefs can push for new rules regarding negotiations if they feel so aggrieved. Bottom line is your anger should be directed at Sanders's agent not Elway. John, and the Broncos, did nothing wrong. In fact, the Broncos were one of the last teams contacted by the agent.
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap2000000334409/article/executives-crying-foul-over-emmanuel-sanders-deal |
but the deal should still be vetoed by goodell. |
Why should he veto a perfectly fair deal? Sanders never signed a deal with the Chiefs. He is still a FA until he signs. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mke1010
Joined: 08 Mar 2008
Posts: 1987
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 16, 2014 1:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| kylecumberland wrote: | | mke1010 wrote: | | kylecumberland wrote: | | Just so you guys know...he agreed in principle on a deal with KC. handshake and everything. then after that his agent called john elway and told him. then elway signed him.... you bronco fans are cool, but John elway is the most manipulative cheating troll i have ever seen. Roger Goodell needs to address this. Yes the agent should be banned, but more needs to be done. |
It didn't go down exactly the way you claim. While the agent may fall short of ethical norms per contract negotiations- he broke no explicit NFL rule.
The Chiefs can push for new rules regarding negotiations if they feel so aggrieved. Bottom line is your anger should be directed at Sanders's agent not Elway. John, and the Broncos, did nothing wrong. In fact, the Broncos were one of the last teams contacted by the agent.
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap2000000334409/article/executives-crying-foul-over-emmanuel-sanders-deal |
but the deal should still be vetoed by goodell. |
Sorry you cannot veto a deal when no rule has been broken.
They had a non binding verbal agreement with the Chiefs. No contract had been signed. Sanders and his agent turned around and shopped the deal around to other teams. First the Bucs and ultimately the Broncos.
You really have no right to cast aspersions on the character of Elway. As I said, your anger should be directed at the agent. His actions were definitely not of moral fiber- that I agree with you on. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kylecumberland
Joined: 04 Feb 2008
Posts: 1162
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 16, 2014 1:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Rh61791 wrote: | | kylecumberland wrote: | | mke1010 wrote: | | kylecumberland wrote: | | Just so you guys know...he agreed in principle on a deal with KC. handshake and everything. then after that his agent called john elway and told him. then elway signed him.... you bronco fans are cool, but John elway is the most manipulative cheating troll i have ever seen. Roger Goodell needs to address this. Yes the agent should be banned, but more needs to be done. |
It didn't go down exactly the way you claim. While the agent may fall short of ethical norms per contract negotiations- he broke no explicit NFL rule.
The Chiefs can push for new rules regarding negotiations if they feel so aggrieved. Bottom line is your anger should be directed at Sanders's agent not Elway. John, and the Broncos, did nothing wrong. In fact, the Broncos were one of the last teams contacted by the agent.
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap2000000334409/article/executives-crying-foul-over-emmanuel-sanders-deal |
but the deal should still be vetoed by goodell. |
Why should he veto a perfectly fair deal? Sanders never signed a deal with the Chiefs. He is still a FA until he signs. |
technically yes. but where I come from a handshake means something. That is how all GM operate. That is why you are hearing multiple GM'S cry foul. Not just KC. this agent is the only agent operating this way. a deal in principle is suuposed to be legit. and seriously do you guys really want a man on your team who shook another mans hand agreeing to a deal? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Rh61791
Joined: 03 Jan 2013
Posts: 59
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 16, 2014 1:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| kylecumberland wrote: | | Rh61791 wrote: | | kylecumberland wrote: | | mke1010 wrote: | | kylecumberland wrote: | | Just so you guys know...he agreed in principle on a deal with KC. handshake and everything. then after that his agent called john elway and told him. then elway signed him.... you bronco fans are cool, but John elway is the most manipulative cheating troll i have ever seen. Roger Goodell needs to address this. Yes the agent should be banned, but more needs to be done. |
It didn't go down exactly the way you claim. While the agent may fall short of ethical norms per contract negotiations- he broke no explicit NFL rule.
The Chiefs can push for new rules regarding negotiations if they feel so aggrieved. Bottom line is your anger should be directed at Sanders's agent not Elway. John, and the Broncos, did nothing wrong. In fact, the Broncos were one of the last teams contacted by the agent.
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap2000000334409/article/executives-crying-foul-over-emmanuel-sanders-deal |
but the deal should still be vetoed by goodell. |
Why should he veto a perfectly fair deal? Sanders never signed a deal with the Chiefs. He is still a FA until he signs. |
technically yes. but whereI come a handshake means something. That is how all GM operate. That is why you are hearing multiple GM'S cry fould. Not just KC. this agent is the only agent operating this way. a deal in principle is suuposed to be legit. and seriously do you guys really want a man on your team who shook another mans hand agreeing to a deal? |
Do you even know if Sanders himself agreed to the deal? Or did the agent just say he did? I guarantee he will be a Bronco by this time tomorrow. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
