You are currently viewing the old forums. We have upgraded to a new NFL Forum.
This old forum is being left as a read-only archive.
Please update your bookmarks to our new forum at forums.footballsfuture.com.


 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

Next Team Without Lombardi To Win 1?
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5
 
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> NFL General
View previous topic :: View next topic  

Next Team Without Lombardi To Win 1?
Jaguars 0-0
2%
 2%  [ 6 ]
Texans 0-0
7%
 7%  [ 17 ]
Lions 0-0
8%
 8%  [ 19 ]
Browns 0-0
6%
 6%  [ 14 ]
Cardinals 0-1
5%
 5%  [ 13 ]
Panthers 0-1
25%
 25%  [ 56 ]
Falcons 0-1
6%
 6%  [ 15 ]
Chargers 0-1
4%
 4%  [ 11 ]
Titans 0-1
2%
 2%  [ 6 ]
Eagles 0-2
15%
 15%  [ 34 ]
Bengals 0-2
4%
 4%  [ 10 ]
Bills 0-4
1%
 1%  [ 3 ]
Vikings 0-4
7%
 7%  [ 17 ]
Total Votes : 221

Author Message
ChazStandard


Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Posts: 7095
Location: The bandwagon, hop on up!
PostPosted: Sun Feb 09, 2014 12:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I voted Texans. Don't really know why. Will probably be an AFC team though, in the next few years Brady/Peyton will ride off into the sunset and suddenly there'll be a power vacuum.
_________________
Adopt-a-Pat
2014 - Rob Gronkowski TE: Rec: 82 Yds: 1124 TD: 12
2015 - Rob Ninkovich DE: Tkl: 52 Sck: 6.5 FF: 1 FR: 1 INT: 0 PD: 7
2016 - Julian Edelman WR: Rec: 98 Yds: 1106 TD: 3
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
T-RichIsTheMan


Joined: 24 Dec 2012
Posts: 604
Location: Cleveland, OH
PostPosted: Thu Feb 13, 2014 10:43 pm    Post subject: Re: Next Team Without Lombardi To Win 1? Reply with quote

Lions017 wrote:
T345 wrote:
Since I'm originally from Detroit, I voted "Lions"...

...but I fear we could actually become the Chicago Cubs of football.


You think that's funny?

Try being a Cubs fan AND a Lions fan. How I picked those two I will never know...


actually, yeah it is. it shows how pitiful a pair of franchises both of them have been for all of eternity.
_________________
http://www.sigrealm.com/freesigs/103_cleveland_browns.jpg
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
T-RichIsTheMan


Joined: 24 Dec 2012
Posts: 604
Location: Cleveland, OH
PostPosted: Thu Feb 13, 2014 10:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

and texans? really?! get the heck outta here. they ain't winning nothing but moral victories.
_________________
http://www.sigrealm.com/freesigs/103_cleveland_browns.jpg
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Uncle Buck


Joined: 10 Apr 2007
Posts: 18579
Location: Viking Country
PostPosted: Sun Feb 16, 2014 8:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

vikingsrule wrote:
J Pep 4 Step wrote:
Panthers. Because why not? Laughing

It still blows my mind that the Lions and Browns, with all their success prior to the modern SB, have never even BEEN to the SB.


I thought I read somewhere that the Vikings are the winningest team of the super bowl era without actually having won a super bowl.

The Vikings or the Bills probably deserve to win a super bowl one of these days, they both have lost four.


The Vikings have also gotten as far as the NFC Championship FIVE times in addition to the four Super Bowl appearances. That's a lot of good teams who came up just short.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
detfan782004


Joined: 01 Apr 2005
Posts: 57792
Location: Omaha
PostPosted: Sun Feb 16, 2014 10:30 pm    Post subject: Re: Next Team Without Lombardi To Win 1? Reply with quote

T-RichIsTheMan wrote:
Lions017 wrote:
T345 wrote:
Since I'm originally from Detroit, I voted "Lions"...

...but I fear we could actually become the Chicago Cubs of football.


You think that's funny?

Try being a Cubs fan AND a Lions fan. How I picked those two I will never know...


actually, yeah it is. it shows how pitiful a pair of franchises both of them have been for all of eternity.


Browns have not been relevant since Detroit was. Just saying.


Of the list the Panthers are probably the most likely
_________________



AAL- Abdullah

Tigers suck. Thanks DD for never getting bull pen
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mistakebytehlak


Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 48868
PostPosted: Sun Feb 16, 2014 10:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

kenney wrote:
Houston. Give us Bridgewater. We are already a more talented roster than everyone else in the poll.


i mean the browns have 6 probowlers..

that being said we need a qb.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
candyman93


Joined: 02 Dec 2009
Posts: 59121
PostPosted: Mon Feb 17, 2014 4:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I hate the pedestal of Super Bowls when it comes to ranking teams. Why is Arizona viewed more positively than Detroit or Cleveland? They've been around since the first days of the NFL and have been to the playoffs 8 times. I'm not talking playoff wins, I'm talking playoff apperances. Yet because they went on some magical run they're viewed at a higher level?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TheMachONE


Joined: 13 Jan 2014
Posts: 1172
Location: racist desert wasteland
PostPosted: Tue Feb 18, 2014 12:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

candyman93 wrote:
I hate the pedestal of Super Bowls when it comes to ranking teams. Why is Arizona viewed more positively than Detroit or Cleveland? They've been around since the first days of the NFL and have been to the playoffs 8 times. I'm not talking playoff wins, I'm talking playoff apperances. Yet because they went on some magical run they're viewed at a higher level?

Maybe because they've had recent success?
_________________
Deone hits hard....
Daryl Washington is an idiot

[quote="Childish Gambino"]Funny the day you born that's really your death sentence[/quote]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
KamChancellor


Joined: 16 Feb 2014
Posts: 11
PostPosted: Sat Feb 22, 2014 7:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Arizona. They have a good head coach and elite defense. They unfortunately played in the toughest division in the NFL. They would have won probably 12 games in other divisions.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
EliteTexan80


Most Valuable Poster
Joined: 30 Apr 2007
Posts: 38732
Location: Three time Mr. fanTASTic!
PostPosted: Sun Feb 23, 2014 4:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kiltman wrote:
If Texans get a QB and stay healthy, they probably have the easiest path. Colts aren't a very scary team, and AFC like I said is pretty weak as a whole. Hard to vote for the worst team in the league last year though.


I can agree with this. It's hard to rally around a team while they're on the clock and all...but the trend lately is that a team with a new coaching staff and a new QB pick #1, they tend to turn it around quickly.

Not saying the Texans WILL, just throwing that out there. Honestly, if Nick Foles doesn't hit a slump and if the team develops a D, the Eagles are in the mix in a big way.
_________________


vike daddy wrote:
EliteTexan80 wrote:
I wanna be a mod.

vastly over rated.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
EliteTexan80


Most Valuable Poster
Joined: 30 Apr 2007
Posts: 38732
Location: Three time Mr. fanTASTic!
PostPosted: Sun Feb 23, 2014 4:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

T-RichIsTheMan wrote:
and texans? really?! get the heck outta here. they ain't winning nothing but moral victories.


...which would actually be a step UP for the Browns. Laughing
_________________


vike daddy wrote:
EliteTexan80 wrote:
I wanna be a mod.

vastly over rated.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
powderblues


Joined: 22 Nov 2010
Posts: 3431
Location: San Diego
PostPosted: Sun Feb 23, 2014 4:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Why are people surprised if a currently bad team is mentioned? Just think 4-5 years ago if someone said "Seahawks", everyone would laugh right?

Smile

Things change fast my friends... its more likely a bad team wins it before a currently good team does.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Panthers11


Joined: 23 Dec 2007
Posts: 26303
Location: FSU: Go Noles
PostPosted: Sun Feb 23, 2014 11:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

powderblues wrote:
Why are people surprised if a currently bad team is mentioned? Just think 4-5 years ago if someone said "Seahawks", everyone would laugh right?

Smile

Things change fast my friends... its more likely a bad team wins it before a currently good team does.


Agreed.
Wut?
_________________

JF16 Forever
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> NFL General All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Page 5 of 5

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group