| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Next Team Without Lombardi To Win 1? |
| Jaguars 0-0 |
|
2% |
[ 6 ] |
| Texans 0-0 |
|
7% |
[ 17 ] |
| Lions 0-0 |
|
8% |
[ 19 ] |
| Browns 0-0 |
|
6% |
[ 14 ] |
| Cardinals 0-1 |
|
5% |
[ 13 ] |
| Panthers 0-1 |
|
25% |
[ 56 ] |
| Falcons 0-1 |
|
6% |
[ 15 ] |
| Chargers 0-1 |
|
4% |
[ 11 ] |
| Titans 0-1 |
|
2% |
[ 6 ] |
| Eagles 0-2 |
|
15% |
[ 34 ] |
| Bengals 0-2 |
|
4% |
[ 10 ] |
| Bills 0-4 |
|
1% |
[ 3 ] |
| Vikings 0-4 |
|
7% |
[ 17 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 221 |
|
| Author |
Message |
ChazStandard
Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Posts: 7095
Location: The bandwagon, hop on up!
|
 Posted: Sun Feb 09, 2014 12:17 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
I voted Texans. Don't really know why. Will probably be an AFC team though, in the next few years Brady/Peyton will ride off into the sunset and suddenly there'll be a power vacuum.
_________________
Adopt-a-Pat
2014 - Rob Gronkowski TE: Rec: 82 Yds: 1124 TD: 12
2015 - Rob Ninkovich DE: Tkl: 52 Sck: 6.5 FF: 1 FR: 1 INT: 0 PD: 7
2016 - Julian Edelman WR: Rec: 98 Yds: 1106 TD: 3 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
T-RichIsTheMan
Joined: 24 Dec 2012
Posts: 604
Location: Cleveland, OH
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 13, 2014 10:43 pm Post subject: Re: Next Team Without Lombardi To Win 1? |
|
|
|
| Lions017 wrote: | | T345 wrote: | Since I'm originally from Detroit, I voted "Lions"...
...but I fear we could actually become the Chicago Cubs of football. |
You think that's funny?
Try being a Cubs fan AND a Lions fan. How I picked those two I will never know... |
actually, yeah it is. it shows how pitiful a pair of franchises both of them have been for all of eternity.
_________________
http://www.sigrealm.com/freesigs/103_cleveland_browns.jpg |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
T-RichIsTheMan
Joined: 24 Dec 2012
Posts: 604
Location: Cleveland, OH
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Uncle Buck
Joined: 10 Apr 2007
Posts: 18579
Location: Viking Country
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 16, 2014 8:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| vikingsrule wrote: | | J Pep 4 Step wrote: | Panthers. Because why not? 
It still blows my mind that the Lions and Browns, with all their success prior to the modern SB, have never even BEEN to the SB. |
I thought I read somewhere that the Vikings are the winningest team of the super bowl era without actually having won a super bowl.
The Vikings or the Bills probably deserve to win a super bowl one of these days, they both have lost four. |
The Vikings have also gotten as far as the NFC Championship FIVE times in addition to the four Super Bowl appearances. That's a lot of good teams who came up just short.
_________________
  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
detfan782004
Joined: 01 Apr 2005
Posts: 57792
Location: Omaha
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 16, 2014 10:30 pm Post subject: Re: Next Team Without Lombardi To Win 1? |
|
|
|
| T-RichIsTheMan wrote: | | Lions017 wrote: | | T345 wrote: | Since I'm originally from Detroit, I voted "Lions"...
...but I fear we could actually become the Chicago Cubs of football. |
You think that's funny?
Try being a Cubs fan AND a Lions fan. How I picked those two I will never know... |
actually, yeah it is. it shows how pitiful a pair of franchises both of them have been for all of eternity. |
Browns have not been relevant since Detroit was. Just saying.
Of the list the Panthers are probably the most likely
_________________
AAL- Abdullah
Tigers suck. Thanks DD for never getting bull pen |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mistakebytehlak
Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 48868
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 16, 2014 10:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| kenney wrote: | | Houston. Give us Bridgewater. We are already a more talented roster than everyone else in the poll. |
i mean the browns have 6 probowlers..
that being said we need a qb. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
candyman93
Joined: 02 Dec 2009
Posts: 59121
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 17, 2014 4:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| I hate the pedestal of Super Bowls when it comes to ranking teams. Why is Arizona viewed more positively than Detroit or Cleveland? They've been around since the first days of the NFL and have been to the playoffs 8 times. I'm not talking playoff wins, I'm talking playoff apperances. Yet because they went on some magical run they're viewed at a higher level? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TheMachONE
Joined: 13 Jan 2014
Posts: 1172
Location: racist desert wasteland
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 18, 2014 12:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| candyman93 wrote: | | I hate the pedestal of Super Bowls when it comes to ranking teams. Why is Arizona viewed more positively than Detroit or Cleveland? They've been around since the first days of the NFL and have been to the playoffs 8 times. I'm not talking playoff wins, I'm talking playoff apperances. Yet because they went on some magical run they're viewed at a higher level? |
Maybe because they've had recent success?
_________________
Deone hits hard....
Daryl Washington is an idiot
[quote="Childish Gambino"]Funny the day you born that's really your death sentence[/quote] |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
KamChancellor
Joined: 16 Feb 2014
Posts: 11
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 22, 2014 7:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Arizona. They have a good head coach and elite defense. They unfortunately played in the toughest division in the NFL. They would have won probably 12 games in other divisions. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
EliteTexan80
Joined: 30 Apr 2007
Posts: 38732
Location: Three time Mr. fanTASTic!
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 23, 2014 4:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Kiltman wrote: | | If Texans get a QB and stay healthy, they probably have the easiest path. Colts aren't a very scary team, and AFC like I said is pretty weak as a whole. Hard to vote for the worst team in the league last year though. |
I can agree with this. It's hard to rally around a team while they're on the clock and all...but the trend lately is that a team with a new coaching staff and a new QB pick #1, they tend to turn it around quickly.
Not saying the Texans WILL, just throwing that out there. Honestly, if Nick Foles doesn't hit a slump and if the team develops a D, the Eagles are in the mix in a big way.
_________________
| vike daddy wrote: | | EliteTexan80 wrote: | | I wanna be a mod. |
vastly over rated. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
EliteTexan80
Joined: 30 Apr 2007
Posts: 38732
Location: Three time Mr. fanTASTic!
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 23, 2014 4:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| T-RichIsTheMan wrote: | | and texans? really?! get the heck outta here. they ain't winning nothing but moral victories. |
...which would actually be a step UP for the Browns.
_________________
| vike daddy wrote: | | EliteTexan80 wrote: | | I wanna be a mod. |
vastly over rated. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
powderblues
Joined: 22 Nov 2010
Posts: 3431
Location: San Diego
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 23, 2014 4:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Why are people surprised if a currently bad team is mentioned? Just think 4-5 years ago if someone said "Seahawks", everyone would laugh right?
Things change fast my friends... its more likely a bad team wins it before a currently good team does. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Panthers11
Joined: 23 Dec 2007
Posts: 26303
Location: FSU: Go Noles
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 23, 2014 11:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| powderblues wrote: | Why are people surprised if a currently bad team is mentioned? Just think 4-5 years ago if someone said "Seahawks", everyone would laugh right?
Things change fast my friends... its more likely a bad team wins it before a currently good team does. |
Agreed.
Wut?
_________________
JF16 Forever |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
