Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

Random Thread VI: What the hell is going on
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 97, 98, 99, 100  Next
 
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> San Francisco 49ers
View previous topic :: View next topic  

How often should we update these polls?
Less than never
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
Less than never
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
Infrequently but more than less than never
5%
 5%  [ 1 ]
At a gentle pace that suggests a frequency greater than infrequent
25%
 25%  [ 5 ]
Perhaps a brisk change every other (insert series of time here)
10%
 10%  [ 2 ]
Far less infrequently than suggested in other suggestions
25%
 25%  [ 5 ]
A frequency indicative of one with ADHD
35%
 35%  [ 7 ]
Total Votes : 20

Author Message
Gore Whore 21


Joined: 15 Nov 2006
Posts: 5314
PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2017 8:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I just looked up Robert Nkemdiche's rookie numbers out of curiosity. I remember reading during the season that Arians was not happy with him, but he ended up playing in 5 games had 1 tackle assist and one pass defended. He's young and is very talented, but so far things are not looking good.
_________________
saintsfan on the sig

"Beer is living proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy."-Benjamin Franklin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rudyZ


Joined: 12 Mar 2007
Posts: 17037
Location: Québec
PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2017 8:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gore Whore 21 wrote:
I just looked up Robert Nkemdiche's rookie numbers out of curiosity. I remember reading during the season that Arians was not happy with him, but he ended up playing in 5 games had 1 tackle assist and one pass defended. He's young and is very talented, but so far things are not looking good.



If the attitude can't get you onto the field, you can't perform.
_________________


RudyZ's Power Rankings Power Ranking

1) RudyZ's Power Rankings Power Ranking
2) y2's pie Power Rankings (3.1416 rules!)
3) N4L's Poster Power Rankings
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Forge


Joined: 19 Feb 2010
Posts: 19069
Location: Las Vegas
PostPosted: Sun Feb 05, 2017 12:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

So TO gets left off, again....but Morten Anderson and Terrell Davis get in? What in the world is that? Wow, hall of fame voting is absolutely atrocious. One of the top 5 greatest wide receivers in history arguably left out to a barely above average field goal kicker who's main claim to fame is just playing a long time, and a running back who was elite for 3 years, but largely only has 4 years of real production along with 3 additional injury marred years.
_________________


Stupid NFL coaches and their need to reach for quarterbacks....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gore Whore 21


Joined: 15 Nov 2006
Posts: 5314
PostPosted: Sun Feb 05, 2017 2:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Forge wrote:
So TO gets left off, again....but Morten Anderson and Terrell Davis get in? What in the world is that? Wow, hall of fame voting is absolutely atrocious. One of the top 5 greatest wide receivers in history arguably left out to a barely above average field goal kicker who's main claim to fame is just playing a long time, and a running back who was elite for 3 years, but largely only has 4 years of real production along with 3 additional injury marred years.


Yeah, T.O., while better than a lot of the players getting the nod over him has fallen into a Ricky Watters type of situation unfortunately. Both of those guys deserve to be in the HOF based on their on-the-field performances, which is supposedly what they base the voting on, but their attitudes and off-field antics have destroyed their perception. T.O. will get in eventually, Watters....maybe someday.
_________________
saintsfan on the sig

"Beer is living proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy."-Benjamin Franklin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Psychlone


Joined: 15 Mar 2008
Posts: 4528
Location: Marin County, CA.
PostPosted: Sun Feb 05, 2017 11:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Had NFC 8, AFC 0 on a $100 a box pool. Kicked in the nuts TWICE this game. Crying or Very sad / Laughing Great game though!
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
StevenK


Joined: 15 Jan 2017
Posts: 183
Location: Texas
PostPosted: Sun Feb 05, 2017 11:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Psychlone wrote:
Had NFC 8, AFC 0 on a $100 a box pool. Kicked in the nuts TWICE this game. Crying or Very sad / Laughing Great game though!


Guy I work with bet $500 on ATL...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
J-ALL-DAY


Joined: 17 Oct 2007
Posts: 44881
PostPosted: Mon Feb 06, 2017 12:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I won $500 in the playoff pool from the office. Only missed one playoff game and picked the Pats to beat the Falcons 30-27.

Still was rooting hard for the Falcons Laughing.
_________________

El ramster on the sig
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
StevenK


Joined: 15 Jan 2017
Posts: 183
Location: Texas
PostPosted: Mon Feb 06, 2017 12:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

J-ALL-DAY wrote:
I won $500 in the playoff pool from the office. Only missed one playoff game and picked the Pats to beat the Falcons 30-27.

Still was rooting hard for the Falcons Laughing.


Wise man, rooted for ATL, but picked the Pats Laughing

You never can count Brady out of anything!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Forge


Joined: 19 Feb 2010
Posts: 19069
Location: Las Vegas
PostPosted: Mon Feb 06, 2017 12:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Feel bad for the guys that took the under at 59 (which was where it was most of the time leading up to the bowl, though it came down). Lots of people were taking the under. And of course overtime and a touchdown and boom, you're at the over. They must have been feeling really good at 28-9
_________________


Stupid NFL coaches and their need to reach for quarterbacks....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
y2lamanaki


Moderator
FF Fanatic
Joined: 03 Jan 2006
Posts: 13924
Location: Lancaster, PA
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2017 11:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Feeling under the weather and need to throw up a little but just can't find a way to do it? Here's a 2016 redraft where Buckner and Garnett are both still on the board at our picks. Spoiler alert: we go elsewhere, proving that Baalke doesn't have the worst draft mind on the planet (which is fascinating with the benefit of hindsight!):

http://www.foxsports.com/nfl/gallery/nfl-draft-2016-do-over-redraft-rookies-best-worst-picks-021317?cmpid=feed:-sports-CQ-RSS-Feed
_________________


Future Hall of Famer Frank Gore's Career Rushing List Tracker:

*Currently Ranked 8th All-Time
*Yards needed to pass #7 Eric Dickerson: 194
*Yards needed to pass #6 Jerome Bettis: 597
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Forge


Joined: 19 Feb 2010
Posts: 19069
Location: Las Vegas
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2017 12:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

y2lamanaki wrote:
Feeling under the weather and need to throw up a little but just can't find a way to do it? Here's a 2016 redraft where Buckner and Garnett are both still on the board at our picks. Spoiler alert: we go elsewhere, proving that Baalke doesn't have the worst draft mind on the planet (which is fascinating with the benefit of hindsight!):

http://www.foxsports.com/nfl/gallery/nfl-draft-2016-do-over-redraft-rookies-best-worst-picks-021317?cmpid=feed:-sports-CQ-RSS-Feed


Buckner at 19 is hilarious. And 4 quarterbacks still taken despite Goff and Lynch looking atrocious. This is a horrible re-draft...they should be proud
_________________


Stupid NFL coaches and their need to reach for quarterbacks....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
big9erfan


Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 19694
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2017 1:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

y2lamanaki wrote:
Feeling under the weather and need to throw up a little but just can't find a way to do it? Here's a 2016 redraft where Buckner and Garnett are both still on the board at our picks. Spoiler alert: we go elsewhere, proving that Baalke doesn't have the worst draft mind on the planet (which is fascinating with the benefit of hindsight!):

http://www.foxsports.com/nfl/gallery/nfl-draft-2016-do-over-redraft-rookies-best-worst-picks-021317?cmpid=feed:-sports-CQ-RSS-Feed


Funny that after watching him play all year they dropped Buckner all the way down to 19. Also, I wanted Whitehair more than Garnett, but as I said a thousand times last year we should have saved our extra picks and just taken whichever of the two of them, or Martin, was still there when our turn rolled around. If they were all still there we should have traded down instead of up. Trent was such a bad draft manager!
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
y2lamanaki


Moderator
FF Fanatic
Joined: 03 Jan 2006
Posts: 13924
Location: Lancaster, PA
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2017 2:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

big9erfan wrote:
y2lamanaki wrote:
Feeling under the weather and need to throw up a little but just can't find a way to do it? Here's a 2016 redraft where Buckner and Garnett are both still on the board at our picks. Spoiler alert: we go elsewhere, proving that Baalke doesn't have the worst draft mind on the planet (which is fascinating with the benefit of hindsight!):

http://www.foxsports.com/nfl/gallery/nfl-draft-2016-do-over-redraft-rookies-best-worst-picks-021317?cmpid=feed:-sports-CQ-RSS-Feed


Funny that after watching him play all year they dropped Buckner all the way down to 19. Also, I wanted Whitehair more than Garnett, but as I said a thousand times last year we should have saved our extra picks and just taken whichever of the two of them, or Martin, was still there when our turn rolled around. If they were all still there we should have traded down instead of up. Trent was such a bad draft manager!


Agreed if we were going that route (OL) - but I still liked the idea of keeping that trade up and selecting Myles Jack, who played well when he got the opportunity last year (but for whatever reason, the Jaguars opted not to play a top 5 talent they found in the 2nd round despite appearing healthy). Certainly would have looked even better for this year.
_________________


Future Hall of Famer Frank Gore's Career Rushing List Tracker:

*Currently Ranked 8th All-Time
*Yards needed to pass #7 Eric Dickerson: 194
*Yards needed to pass #6 Jerome Bettis: 597
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
big9erfan


Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 19694
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2017 2:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

y2lamanaki wrote:
big9erfan wrote:
y2lamanaki wrote:
Feeling under the weather and need to throw up a little but just can't find a way to do it? Here's a 2016 redraft where Buckner and Garnett are both still on the board at our picks. Spoiler alert: we go elsewhere, proving that Baalke doesn't have the worst draft mind on the planet (which is fascinating with the benefit of hindsight!):

http://www.foxsports.com/nfl/gallery/nfl-draft-2016-do-over-redraft-rookies-best-worst-picks-021317?cmpid=feed:-sports-CQ-RSS-Feed


Funny that after watching him play all year they dropped Buckner all the way down to 19. Also, I wanted Whitehair more than Garnett, but as I said a thousand times last year we should have saved our extra picks and just taken whichever of the two of them, or Martin, was still there when our turn rolled around. If they were all still there we should have traded down instead of up. Trent was such a bad draft manager!


Agreed if we were going that route (OL) - but I still liked the idea of keeping that trade up and selecting Myles Jack, who played well when he got the opportunity last year (but for whatever reason, the Jaguars opted not to play a top 5 talent they found in the 2nd round despite appearing healthy). Certainly would have looked even better for this year.


I agree with this too. Trade up for a unique talent or stay put to take one a few very similar guys.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
big9erfan


Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 19694
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2017 5:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Aldon Smith!!!???
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> San Francisco 49ers All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 97, 98, 99, 100  Next
Page 98 of 100

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group