Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

Seahawks (9-1) vs Vikings (2-7): The Rise of Harvin?
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 13, 14, 15  Next
 
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Seattle Seahawks
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
outside_Insider


Joined: 29 Jan 2012
Posts: 1218
Location: Calgary, AB
PostPosted: Mon Nov 18, 2013 7:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Not too much. I've been crazy busy with work this year starting the new company. Missed you guys though.

Man our front 7 are planning lights out right now. Last game was one of the more exciting games I've watched in a long time.

I went to the TB game, wow did dodge a bullet there.
_________________


"We all we got, we all we need"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
klyon7634


Joined: 13 Jul 2007
Posts: 11685
Location: New York
PostPosted: Mon Nov 18, 2013 11:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

outside_Insider wrote:
Not too much. I've been crazy busy with work this year starting the new company. Missed you guys though.

Man our front 7 are planning lights out right now. Last game was one of the more exciting games I've watched in a long time.

I went to the TB game, wow did dodge a bullet there.


Planning lights out? Is that some sort of party or something? Wink

Glad your back man. Will it be permanent?
_________________


Seahawks~ Yankees~ Knicks~ Syracuse Orange


#JDI
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
outside_Insider


Joined: 29 Jan 2012
Posts: 1218
Location: Calgary, AB
PostPosted: Tue Nov 19, 2013 5:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hah yeah, another super bowl stunt.. Jk

PLAYING....haha opps.
_________________


"We all we got, we all we need"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
outside_Insider


Joined: 29 Jan 2012
Posts: 1218
Location: Calgary, AB
PostPosted: Tue Nov 19, 2013 5:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Does TheOsprey ever drop by anymore?
_________________


"We all we got, we all we need"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sacks98


Joined: 21 Dec 2009
Posts: 3985
PostPosted: Tue Nov 19, 2013 7:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

outside_Insider wrote:
Does TheOsprey ever drop by anymore?


Don't know haven't seen him in awhile last time i did he was being negative about Wilson.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tatupu_64


Moderator
Joined: 05 Apr 2007
Posts: 21565
Location: Hello. My name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die.
PostPosted: Tue Nov 19, 2013 8:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The message boards aren't designed for talking to each other casually or about other members. If you want to chat, head over to This Aint Hawks Talk.
_________________
<Ram
BlaqOptic wrote:
...13 Seahawks one spot over the 08 Steelers

ram29jackson wrote:
LO freaking L...Seahawks aren't repeating crap and you can book that
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
klyon7634


Joined: 13 Jul 2007
Posts: 11685
Location: New York
PostPosted: Tue Nov 19, 2013 9:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tatupu_64 wrote:
The message boards aren't designed for talking to each other casually or about other members. If you want to chat, head over to This Aint Hawks Talk.


Rolling Eyes

How dare we have 5 posts talking to a guy who hasn't been around forever.
_________________


Seahawks~ Yankees~ Knicks~ Syracuse Orange


#JDI
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
thedudehi


Joined: 14 Jan 2009
Posts: 329
PostPosted: Tue Nov 19, 2013 10:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tatupu_64 wrote:
Pie Romania wrote:
I'm wondering how we shut down the Saints. I know our offense will do better than the 9ers. If Browner is back, we should be able to shut down their passing game as well IMO. Browner could be put on Jimmy Graham and Sherman on Colston (or vice versa) with Thurmond III on Kenny Stills and Maxwell on whoever else they have lined up at receiver. I'm probably most worried about Sproles as we have trouble with smaller backs usually. I was surprised the Falcons didn't use more of Jacquizz Rodgers honestly. When he touched the ball he did well.
I don't think of us as really a matchup team generally, but I do think you're right in this case. We'll have to shadow to some extent.

Against San Fran Sherman followed Boldin and against the Bucs VJax was covered by Browner or Sherm the whole game, even while in the slot.

I'd like to see us stick Browner on Colston the whole game. I think he'll actually fair better than Sherm and he wont need to be quite at full speed with Graham gimping.

I'm not sure we'll straight match up with the rest of the guys though. That doesn't seem like our style.


Browner will be out 4-6 weeks. The team might be IR'ing him. Sucks because we could use him against a player like Graham, but who knows if Carroll would do that.

I don't think we miss much by promoting Thurmond and Maxwell on the ends however.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
hawkman98272


Joined: 02 Jan 2009
Posts: 18848
PostPosted: Tue Nov 19, 2013 11:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Simon and Scruggs are supposed to be back too. Not saying Simon=BB, but Simon is more likely to be in our long term plan while Browner isn't, so getting him some snaps would be nice.

Although Thurmond, Maxwell and Lane are great options to have in case of injury.
_________________

IDOG_det

#JDI
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SupeRG00F


Joined: 12 Aug 2012
Posts: 1394
Location: Vancouver, Wa
PostPosted: Tue Nov 19, 2013 11:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

hawkman98272 wrote:
Simon and Scruggs are supposed to be back too. Not saying Simon=BB, but Simon is more likely to be in our long term plan while Browner isn't, so getting him some snaps would be nice.

Although Thurmond, Maxwell and Lane are great options to have in case of injury.
I hope Simon plays. Really interested to see how he does. Not expecting much though. Laughing
_________________


Xbox Gamertag: SupeR G00F
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ring Worm Sherm


Joined: 27 Apr 2013
Posts: 970
Location: PNW
PostPosted: Wed Nov 20, 2013 5:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

thedudehi wrote:
Tatupu_64 wrote:
Pie Romania wrote:
I'm wondering how we shut down the Saints. I know our offense will do better than the 9ers. If Browner is back, we should be able to shut down their passing game as well IMO. Browner could be put on Jimmy Graham and Sherman on Colston (or vice versa) with Thurmond III on Kenny Stills and Maxwell on whoever else they have lined up at receiver. I'm probably most worried about Sproles as we have trouble with smaller backs usually. I was surprised the Falcons didn't use more of Jacquizz Rodgers honestly. When he touched the ball he did well.
I don't think of us as really a matchup team generally, but I do think you're right in this case. We'll have to shadow to some extent.

Against San Fran Sherman followed Boldin and against the Bucs VJax was covered by Browner or Sherm the whole game, even while in the slot.

I'd like to see us stick Browner on Colston the whole game. I think he'll actually fair better than Sherm and he wont need to be quite at full speed with Graham gimping.

I'm not sure we'll straight match up with the rest of the guys though. That doesn't seem like our style.


Browner will be out 4-6 weeks. The team might be IR'ing him. Sucks because we could use him against a player like Graham, but who knows if Carroll would do that.

I don't think we miss much by promoting Thurmond and Maxwell on the ends however.


I think Kam will mostly be the one on Graham.
_________________


“Its pay back, Russell Wilson"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tatupu_64


Moderator
Joined: 05 Apr 2007
Posts: 21565
Location: Hello. My name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die.
PostPosted: Wed Nov 20, 2013 12:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

klyon7634 wrote:
Tatupu_64 wrote:
The message boards aren't designed for talking to each other casually or about other members. If you want to chat, head over to This Aint Hawks Talk.


Rolling Eyes

How dare we have 5 posts talking to a guy who hasn't been around forever.
I didn't say you couldn't. In fact, I encouraged it by saying you should move it over to TAST. Knock it off with the attitude please.
_________________
<Ram
BlaqOptic wrote:
...13 Seahawks one spot over the 08 Steelers

ram29jackson wrote:
LO freaking L...Seahawks aren't repeating crap and you can book that
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Pie Romania


Joined: 23 Aug 2012
Posts: 1828
Location: Seattle, WA
PostPosted: Wed Nov 20, 2013 12:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ring Worm Sherm wrote:
thedudehi wrote:
Tatupu_64 wrote:
Pie Romania wrote:
I'm wondering how we shut down the Saints. I know our offense will do better than the 9ers. If Browner is back, we should be able to shut down their passing game as well IMO. Browner could be put on Jimmy Graham and Sherman on Colston (or vice versa) with Thurmond III on Kenny Stills and Maxwell on whoever else they have lined up at receiver. I'm probably most worried about Sproles as we have trouble with smaller backs usually. I was surprised the Falcons didn't use more of Jacquizz Rodgers honestly. When he touched the ball he did well.
I don't think of us as really a matchup team generally, but I do think you're right in this case. We'll have to shadow to some extent.

Against San Fran Sherman followed Boldin and against the Bucs VJax was covered by Browner or Sherm the whole game, even while in the slot.

I'd like to see us stick Browner on Colston the whole game. I think he'll actually fair better than Sherm and he wont need to be quite at full speed with Graham gimping.

I'm not sure we'll straight match up with the rest of the guys though. That doesn't seem like our style.


Browner will be out 4-6 weeks. The team might be IR'ing him. Sucks because we could use him against a player like Graham, but who knows if Carroll would do that.

I don't think we miss much by promoting Thurmond and Maxwell on the ends however.


I think Kam will mostly be the one on Graham.


That scares the hell out of me. I hope they use one of Lane or Maxwell as well and double team the guy.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tatupu_64


Moderator
Joined: 05 Apr 2007
Posts: 21565
Location: Hello. My name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die.
PostPosted: Wed Nov 20, 2013 12:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

thedudehi wrote:
Tatupu_64 wrote:
Pie Romania wrote:
I'm wondering how we shut down the Saints. I know our offense will do better than the 9ers. If Browner is back, we should be able to shut down their passing game as well IMO. Browner could be put on Jimmy Graham and Sherman on Colston (or vice versa) with Thurmond III on Kenny Stills and Maxwell on whoever else they have lined up at receiver. I'm probably most worried about Sproles as we have trouble with smaller backs usually. I was surprised the Falcons didn't use more of Jacquizz Rodgers honestly. When he touched the ball he did well.
I don't think of us as really a matchup team generally, but I do think you're right in this case. We'll have to shadow to some extent.

Against San Fran Sherman followed Boldin and against the Bucs VJax was covered by Browner or Sherm the whole game, even while in the slot.

I'd like to see us stick Browner on Colston the whole game. I think he'll actually fair better than Sherm and he wont need to be quite at full speed with Graham gimping.

I'm not sure we'll straight match up with the rest of the guys though. That doesn't seem like our style.


Browner will be out 4-6 weeks. The team might be IR'ing him. Sucks because we could use him against a player like Graham, but who knows if Carroll would do that.

I don't think we miss much by promoting Thurmond and Maxwell on the ends however.
Yeah I said that before that was announced. I heard he'll miss 4-6 weeks.

I wouldn't normally say we'd miss him much, but there isn't a player in the NFL that's a better matchup for covering Jimmy Graham
_________________
<Ram
BlaqOptic wrote:
...13 Seahawks one spot over the 08 Steelers

ram29jackson wrote:
LO freaking L...Seahawks aren't repeating crap and you can book that
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
outside_Insider


Joined: 29 Jan 2012
Posts: 1218
Location: Calgary, AB
PostPosted: Wed Nov 20, 2013 1:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tatupu_64 wrote:
The message boards aren't designed for talking to each other casually or about other members. If you want to chat, head over to This Aint Hawks Talk.


Wow Tats. Wow.
_________________


"We all we got, we all we need"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Seattle Seahawks All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 13, 14, 15  Next
Page 14 of 15

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group