Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

Packers sign Seneca Wallace
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> NFL News
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Forge


Joined: 19 Feb 2010
Posts: 7266
PostPosted: Mon Sep 02, 2013 9:38 am    Post subject: Packers sign Seneca Wallace Reply with quote

Per PFT:

Quote:
When the Packers cut B.J. Coleman, the only backup quarterback on their 53-man roster, we wondered who Aaron Rodgers‘ backup would be. It didn’t take long to find out the answer: Seneca Wallace.

Wallace signed with the Packers today, Ed Werder of ESPN reports.


Pretty eventful preseason for a guy who is unlikely to play a single down throughout the year. I don't get the love of Seneca Wallace while a guy like Brian Hoyer can't get any love as a potential back up quarterback.
_________________


Two in harmony surpasses one in perfection - P3
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JaguarCrazy2832


Joined: 28 Jun 2008
Posts: 84121
PostPosted: Mon Sep 02, 2013 9:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

another retired QB Green Bay?
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jwalter_81


Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 2085
Location: Harrogate, England
PostPosted: Mon Sep 02, 2013 10:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I would laugh if the 49ers picked up VY lol
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ugLymayNe


Joined: 31 Oct 2006
Posts: 12806
Location: Wisconsin
PostPosted: Mon Sep 02, 2013 11:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Next up in Green Bay, the Packers will drag Doug Flutie out of retirement to backup Aaron Rodgers.
_________________
@PJHotel_
Uglystik1072<---Gamertag

Sig brought to you by Justo
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Pie Romania


Joined: 23 Aug 2012
Posts: 1828
Location: Seattle, WA
PostPosted: Mon Sep 02, 2013 11:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Heard the 9ers just brought him in to leverage Colt McCoy. LOL. I like Seneca Wallace, so I'm glad he went anywhere away from San Francisco.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dubyajay


Joined: 23 Mar 2010
Posts: 1736
PostPosted: Mon Sep 02, 2013 12:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

jwalter_81 wrote:
I would laugh if the 49ers picked up VY lol

He's not smart enough to relay any useful info to them anyway.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TheKillerNacho


Joined: 10 Feb 2008
Posts: 9940
Location: Pennsylvania
PostPosted: Mon Sep 02, 2013 12:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Erm... Didn't he retire? I guess the chance at being Aaron Rodgers' backup was too much. Razz

I guess this means the end of BJ Coleman.
_________________
With much cheese,

Nacho Simulation Football League
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
Ketchup


Joined: 13 May 2009
Posts: 14176
Location: Milwaukee, WI
PostPosted: Mon Sep 02, 2013 12:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

TheKillerNacho wrote:
Erm... Didn't he retire? I guess the chance at being Aaron Rodgers' backup was too much. Razz

I guess this means the end of BJ Coleman.
No he didn't. Harbaugh inaccurately stated that Wallace was retiring.
_________________

Kempes on the custom sig!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
J-ALL-DAY


Joined: 17 Oct 2007
Posts: 28239
PostPosted: Mon Sep 02, 2013 2:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ketchup wrote:
TheKillerNacho wrote:
Erm... Didn't he retire? I guess the chance at being Aaron Rodgers' backup was too much. Razz

I guess this means the end of BJ Coleman.
No he didn't. Harbaugh inaccurately stated that Wallace was retiring.


Pssh, Harbaugh inaccurately stating something? Never! My response to your post:

Just gobble, gobble, gobble turkey from jive turkey gobblers



Laughing
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SteelKing728


Joined: 23 Aug 2008
Posts: 14916
Location: Gibsonia, Pennsylvania
PostPosted: Mon Sep 02, 2013 8:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I can't imagine him being very good, so with that said, I approve of this move by Green Bay. Mr. Green

Seriously, if he was any good, why would NO and SF have cut him already?
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
JammerHammer21


Joined: 27 Dec 2009
Posts: 27101
Location: Anywhere
PostPosted: Mon Sep 02, 2013 8:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

SteelKing728 wrote:
I can't imagine him being very good, so with that said, I approve of this move by Green Bay. Mr. Green

Seriously, if he was any good, why would NO and SF have cut him already?


Maybe because he doesn't fit the system? There could be a multitude of reasons. Why does any team pick up any player that is cut is what your logic is saying. Laughing
_________________

Bohlmann20 (On The 95 Cleveland Browns Staff) wrote:
Lombardi - Isn't that the guy the trophy is named after? If so, top 3 coach of all time.

#JDI
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ketchup


Joined: 13 May 2009
Posts: 14176
Location: Milwaukee, WI
PostPosted: Mon Sep 02, 2013 8:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

SteelKing728 wrote:
I can't imagine him being very good, so with that said, I approve of this move by Green Bay. Mr. Green

Seriously, if he was any good, why would NO and SF have cut him already?
Same reason Cassell was signed by Minny. Or why Orton was signed by Dallas. Or why Indy signed Hasselbeck. They are all guys that were cut. Does that make them bad? No, of course not. They are all guys that can't start in this league but if needed, can get you through a couple games should the starter go down.
_________________

Kempes on the custom sig!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
SteelKing728


Joined: 23 Aug 2008
Posts: 14916
Location: Gibsonia, Pennsylvania
PostPosted: Mon Sep 02, 2013 8:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

JammerHammer21 wrote:
SteelKing728 wrote:
I can't imagine him being very good, so with that said, I approve of this move by Green Bay. Mr. Green

Seriously, if he was any good, why would NO and SF have cut him already?


Maybe because he doesn't fit the system? There could be a multitude of reasons. Why does any team pick up any player that is cut is what your logic is saying. Laughing


I was trying to be more direct to Wallace. It didn't appear that way. My bad.

No, what I was saying was as a 3rd string (now 2nd string QB), you'd think Wallace would be able to pick up a system given he was probably asked to play as an "option QB" in practice for both squads, which is a college type offense. If thats the case, it really shouldn't be that hard to pick up.

There are a multitude of reasons. My guess though is he's just not that good and Green Bay desperately needed someone else (allthough personally I don't believe they should have cut Vince Young).

oh, and just to add, it appears Green Bay really isn't that great for developing QBs if Brohm, Harrell, Daniels and Young haven't worked out recently. They only two to have success have been Matt Flynn and Aaron Rodgers.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
IrishGreen


Joined: 22 Mar 2007
Posts: 37193
PostPosted: Mon Sep 02, 2013 8:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

^lol cringe-worthy tbh
_________________

El Ramster on the amazing work
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ketchup


Joined: 13 May 2009
Posts: 14176
Location: Milwaukee, WI
PostPosted: Mon Sep 02, 2013 8:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

SteelKing728 wrote:
JammerHammer21 wrote:
SteelKing728 wrote:
I can't imagine him being very good, so with that said, I approve of this move by Green Bay. Mr. Green

Seriously, if he was any good, why would NO and SF have cut him already?


Maybe because he doesn't fit the system? There could be a multitude of reasons. Why does any team pick up any player that is cut is what your logic is saying. Laughing


I was trying to be more direct to Wallace. It didn't appear that way. My bad.

No, what I was saying was as a 3rd string (now 2nd string QB), you'd think Wallace would be able to pick up a system given he was probably asked to play as an "option QB" in practice for both squads, which is a college type offense. If thats the case, it really shouldn't be that hard to pick up.

There are a multitude of reasons. My guess though is he's just not that good and Green Bay desperately needed someone else (allthough personally I don't believe they should have cut Vince Young).

oh, and just to add, it appears Green Bay really isn't that great for developing QBs if Brohm, Harrell, Daniels and Young haven't worked out recently. They only two to have success have been Matt Flynn and Aaron Rodgers.
Only you would find a way to bash the Packers and continue to disrespect the best QB in the league by spelling his name like a girl in a thread about our back up QB.

Grow up. Really. That hating crap and purposely spelling Aaron's name wrong is no different then calling the Vikings the Vi-Queens. It's childish and unnecessary. If you can't put your big boy pants on and discuss stuff like an adult about a rival, then don't click the thread.
_________________

Kempes on the custom sig!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> NFL News All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group