Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

How does the DL shake out?
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Green Bay Packers
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
perrynoid


Joined: 20 Jan 2006
Posts: 3965
Location: Bismarck, Norse Dakota
PostPosted: Thu Aug 22, 2013 9:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Not to get off-topic, but does anyone think there is an increased likelihood that Oakland (given RM's familiarity with the Packer's roster) might snatch up (final roster cut) players who would otherwise clear waivers? If so, who do you think he would likely target (given Oakland's death of talent)?
_________________
"No one can disguise mediocrity better than Bill Belichick."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
justo


Joined: 05 Aug 2012
Posts: 12939
PostPosted: Thu Aug 22, 2013 10:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

McThreadski wrote:
justo wrote:
wgbeethree wrote:
Pickett, Wilson, and Jolly.

Do we really keep three guys who offer very little in pass rush?
Well, we've always been two deep at NT, so Pickett and Jolly/Miller are virtual locks to make the roster, IMO. Without knowing how Jerel Worthy is going to play like in 2013, I'd say all three have to make the roster.


Who is Miller?
http://www.packers.com/team/roster/Jordan-Miller/00713911-2c5e-4a99-86f4-cc0a4bc00fa5
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
ugLymayNe


Joined: 31 Oct 2006
Posts: 12366
Location: Wisconsin
PostPosted: Thu Aug 22, 2013 11:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

justo wrote:
McThreadski wrote:
justo wrote:
wgbeethree wrote:
Pickett, Wilson, and Jolly.

Do we really keep three guys who offer very little in pass rush?
Well, we've always been two deep at NT, so Pickett and Jolly/Miller are virtual locks to make the roster, IMO. Without knowing how Jerel Worthy is going to play like in 2013, I'd say all three have to make the roster.


Who is Miller?
http://www.packers.com/team/roster/Jordan-Miller/00713911-2c5e-4a99-86f4-cc0a4bc00fa5


Miller looks bad against third stringers - no way he makes the team over Boyd or Jolly(two guys that are probably 6 & 7 on the depth chart until Worthy comes back).
_________________
@PJHotel_

Sig brought to you by Justo
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CentralFC


Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 3686
Location: Evanston, IL
PostPosted: Thu Aug 22, 2013 11:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ugLymayNe wrote:
justo wrote:
McThreadski wrote:
justo wrote:
wgbeethree wrote:
Pickett, Wilson, and Jolly.

Do we really keep three guys who offer very little in pass rush?
Well, we've always been two deep at NT, so Pickett and Jolly/Miller are virtual locks to make the roster, IMO. Without knowing how Jerel Worthy is going to play like in 2013, I'd say all three have to make the roster.


Who is Miller?
http://www.packers.com/team/roster/Jordan-Miller/00713911-2c5e-4a99-86f4-cc0a4bc00fa5


Miller looks bad against third stringers - no way he makes the team over Boyd or Jolly(two guys that are probably 6 & 7 on the depth chart until Worthy comes back).


Yep:

1. BJ Raji
2. Datone Jones
3. Mike Neal
5. Mike Daniels
4. Ryan Pickett
5. CJ Wilson
6. Johny Jolly
7. Josh Boyd
8. Jordan Miller

UR: Jerel Worthy; would fit in between 4-6 IMO.
_________________
Simian07:
Quote:
I'd argue Jordy is probably around the 30th-40th best receiver in the NFL, maybe 50th.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
justo


Joined: 05 Aug 2012
Posts: 12939
PostPosted: Fri Aug 23, 2013 12:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ugLymayNe wrote:
justo wrote:
McThreadski wrote:
justo wrote:
wgbeethree wrote:
Pickett, Wilson, and Jolly.

Do we really keep three guys who offer very little in pass rush?
Well, we've always been two deep at NT, so Pickett and Jolly/Miller are virtual locks to make the roster, IMO. Without knowing how Jerel Worthy is going to play like in 2013, I'd say all three have to make the roster.


Who is Miller?
http://www.packers.com/team/roster/Jordan-Miller/00713911-2c5e-4a99-86f4-cc0a4bc00fa5


Miller looks bad against third stringers - no way he makes the team over Boyd or Jolly(two guys that are probably 6 & 7 on the depth chart until Worthy comes back).
He was on the roster last year. If Jolly wasn't on the roster, I think he's make it. We need at least one more body there (outside of Raji/Pickett). We even tried to go after one in FA.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
vang_evo9


Joined: 13 Aug 2011
Posts: 1034
Location: Fresno, CA
PostPosted: Fri Aug 23, 2013 1:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

perrynoid wrote:
Not to get off-topic, but does anyone think there is an increased likelihood that Oakland (given RM's familiarity with the Packer's roster) might snatch up (final roster cut) players who would otherwise clear waivers? If so, who do you think he would likely target (given Oakland's death of talent)?


Well yea, he's done so so far. Jon Hoese, Brandian Ross, Johnny Jones, Vic So'oto, Ray Dominguez, are some.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
HyponGrey


Joined: 23 Jun 2012
Posts: 3686
Location: SNJ
PostPosted: Fri Aug 23, 2013 12:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

justo wrote:
ugLymayNe wrote:
justo wrote:
McThreadski wrote:
justo wrote:
wgbeethree wrote:
Pickett, Wilson, and Jolly.

Do we really keep three guys who offer very little in pass rush?
Well, we've always been two deep at NT, so Pickett and Jolly/Miller are virtual locks to make the roster, IMO. Without knowing how Jerel Worthy is going to play like in 2013, I'd say all three have to make the roster.


Who is Miller?
http://www.packers.com/team/roster/Jordan-Miller/00713911-2c5e-4a99-86f4-cc0a4bc00fa5


Miller looks bad against third stringers - no way he makes the team over Boyd or Jolly(two guys that are probably 6 & 7 on the depth chart until Worthy comes back).
He was on the roster last year. If Jolly wasn't on the roster, I think he's make it. We need at least one more body there (outside of Raji/Pickett). We even tried to go after one in FA.
You forget Trg said he believed Boyd could play NT. Would much prefer Jolly to Miller though
_________________
Stop me if you've heard this one: a stockholder and a skypilot walk into a bar...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
justo


Joined: 05 Aug 2012
Posts: 12939
PostPosted: Fri Aug 23, 2013 1:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

HyponGrey wrote:
justo wrote:
ugLymayNe wrote:
justo wrote:
McThreadski wrote:
justo wrote:
wgbeethree wrote:
Pickett, Wilson, and Jolly.

Do we really keep three guys who offer very little in pass rush?
Well, we've always been two deep at NT, so Pickett and Jolly/Miller are virtual locks to make the roster, IMO. Without knowing how Jerel Worthy is going to play like in 2013, I'd say all three have to make the roster.


Who is Miller?
http://www.packers.com/team/roster/Jordan-Miller/00713911-2c5e-4a99-86f4-cc0a4bc00fa5


Miller looks bad against third stringers - no way he makes the team over Boyd or Jolly(two guys that are probably 6 & 7 on the depth chart until Worthy comes back).
He was on the roster last year. If Jolly wasn't on the roster, I think he's make it. We need at least one more body there (outside of Raji/Pickett). We even tried to go after one in FA.
You forget Trg said he believed Boyd could play NT. Would much prefer Jolly to Miller though
I know they entertained the idea after the draft, but have they acted like he's going to get NT snaps?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
CactusPackFan


Joined: 07 May 2007
Posts: 758
Location: AZ
PostPosted: Sat Aug 24, 2013 11:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

WATCH THE TAPE--NEAL IS EXTREMELY OVER-RATED!
_________________


Special Thanks To Jordyzzz for the awesome sig!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SDN40


Joined: 13 Jan 2008
Posts: 3702
PostPosted: Sat Aug 24, 2013 11:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think Neal may be the odd man out. He is now a tweener with an expiring contract and some young guys with upside right there with him.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
blueswedeshoes


Joined: 08 Jun 2011
Posts: 1375
Location: WisKAHNsin
PostPosted: Sat Aug 24, 2013 12:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

CentralFC wrote:

Yep:

1. BJ Raji
2. Datone Jones
3. Mike Neal
5. Mike Daniels
4. Ryan Pickett
5. CJ Wilson
6. Johny Jolly
7. Josh Boyd
8. Jordan Miller

UR: Jerel Worthy; would fit in between 4-6 IMO.


That is a sneaky way to keep nine on the DL and only have it count for eight. Razz
_________________
Homer wrote:
Marge, don't discourage the boy! Weaseling out of things is important to learn. It's what separates us from the animals! Except the weasel.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
HyponGrey


Joined: 23 Jun 2012
Posts: 3686
Location: SNJ
PostPosted: Sat Aug 24, 2013 3:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ugLymayNe wrote:
justo wrote:
McThreadski wrote:
justo wrote:
wgbeethree wrote:
Pickett, Wilson, and Jolly.

Do we really keep three guys who offer very little in pass rush?
Well, we've always been two deep at NT, so Pickett and Jolly/Miller are virtual locks to make the roster, IMO. Without knowing how Jerel Worthy is going to play like in 2013, I'd say all three have to make the roster.


Who is Miller?
http://www.packers.com/team/roster/Jordan-Miller/00713911-2c5e-4a99-86f4-cc0a4bc00fa5


Miller looks bad against third stringers - no way he makes the team over Boyd or Jolly(two guys that are probably 6 & 7 on the depth chart until Worthy comes back).
He looked decent enough last night. Kudos justo.
_________________
Stop me if you've heard this one: a stockholder and a skypilot walk into a bar...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DavidatMIZZOU


Joined: 09 Apr 2009
Posts: 9051
Location: The ZOU
PostPosted: Sat Aug 24, 2013 3:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think Miller looks just as good as Toribio or Muir. Both of whom we cut but others picked up.
_________________
GO PACK GO!

mistakebytehlak wrote:

My god it must be so terrible to have three teams that consistently make the playoffs
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MNPackfan32


Joined: 22 Sep 2010
Posts: 7801
PostPosted: Sat Aug 24, 2013 3:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

SDN40 wrote:
I think Neal may be the odd man out. He is now a tweener with an expiring contract and some young guys with upside right there with him.
He is super cheap. He is versatile, and had the 2nd most sacks on the team last year. Cutting Neal would blow my mind. We haven't even seen him rush inside yet, plus he frees up Clay to be a movable chess piece. I don't see it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
HyponGrey


Joined: 23 Jun 2012
Posts: 3686
Location: SNJ
PostPosted: Sat Aug 24, 2013 3:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

perrynoid wrote:
Not to get off-topic, but does anyone think there is an increased likelihood that Oakland (given RM's familiarity with the Packer's roster) might snatch up (final roster cut) players who would otherwise clear waivers? If so, who do you think he would likely target (given Oakland's death of talent)?
Don't forget KC, who's GM has also come from us, has already signed former Packers, and runs a 34.
_________________
Stop me if you've heard this one: a stockholder and a skypilot walk into a bar...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Green Bay Packers All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Page 5 of 6

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group