| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
91jmay
Joined: 11 Dec 2006
Posts: 29949
Location: Wonderland
|
 Posted: Mon Jun 03, 2013 12:28 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| Yep, love Charles and love the signing but he never was a lock down corner. There is a strong debate to say a play maker is far more important than a lock down corner but that is not what is being argued here. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Silver&Black88
Joined: 24 Feb 2009
Posts: 41597
Location: Los Angeles, CA
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 03, 2013 12:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Agreed. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DirtyHarry
Joined: 15 Mar 2006
Posts: 3413
Location: Foster City,CA
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 03, 2013 2:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| 91jmay wrote: | | Yep, love Charles and love the signing but he never was a lock down corner. There is a strong debate to say a play maker is far more important than a lock down corner but that is not what is being argued here. |
Now I think some of u guys are underselling him. At the same time though u guys probably think we are overrating his time here lol. Keep in mind he played in the renown " single high safety rush 4 d " but he still made plays.
_________________
| JonesDrew32 wrote: | 38-10 Chargers
This game should definitely bring some lulz from the Raiders side. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
THE MAD STORK
Joined: 07 Aug 2012
Posts: 925
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 03, 2013 3:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Burgesskills wrote: | | Quote: | And you're not worth a legitimate response. Ever. To add, this place would be significantly better w/ you not here.
These are the replies you deserve. |
Just saw this now, funny how you steal my suggestion that this place would be better without you. I would post more if you weren't a member of this forum.
You are very simple minded. So soft. |
Sometimes I wonder how old you guys are? hopefully young, cause only facebook girls argue over the internet |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CrapTakula
Joined: 17 Jan 2007
Posts: 9839
Location: Gilead
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 03, 2013 3:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| THE MAD STORK wrote: | | Burgesskills wrote: | | Quote: | And you're not worth a legitimate response. Ever. To add, this place would be significantly better w/ you not here.
These are the replies you deserve. |
Just saw this now, funny how you steal my suggestion that this place would be better without you. I would post more if you weren't a member of this forum.
You are very simple minded. So soft. |
Sometimes I wonder how old you guys are? hopefully young, cause only facebook girls argue over the internet |
Now now...
What would the interwebs be without polite debate?
Also, insulting all of the other posters at one time doesn't do much for your image as a mature, rational fella, so lets nip all if the sniping in the bud right here and now!
_________________
Bolansho Boro Begoz |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Burgesskills
Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 1168
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 03, 2013 10:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Quote: |
Also, insulting all of the other posters at one time doesn't do much for your image as a mature, rational fella, so lets nip all if the sniping in the bud right here and now! |
I got you Crappy.
I don't try to argue or call anyone out, only one person rubs me the wrong way around here.
Besides being called clueless by someone I have no problems with anyone.
Woodson's interceptions dropped because he was ignored and he was a great cover corner and a play maker/ball hawk. I have watched every singles Raiders game since 1998. Woodson would lock down receivers he rivaled Champ Bailey as best cover corner in the league for a few years straight and he made plays. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
