You are currently viewing the old forums. We have upgraded to a new NFL Forum.
This old forum is being left as a read-only archive.
Please update your bookmarks to our new forum at forums.footballsfuture.com.


 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

FFMD II: Bengals War Room -- OTC @10:30 PM
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4 ... 27, 28, 29  Next
 
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Cincinnati Bengals
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
wrminning


Joined: 06 Jan 2007
Posts: 2546
Location: Cincinnati
PostPosted: Sun Apr 07, 2013 7:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ark23 wrote:
Alright the consensus seems to be no to the deal. Which leaves us with a few questions. First, do we wanna use a code when talking about draft prospects? I'm fine either way so it's really what you guys want to do. We should also start discussing some options at 21.

To me we have clear needs at RT, LB (any of the three positions), S and RB. Those are needs that must be addressed and are currently holes on the roster. In order of how pressing they are, I'd say it goes LB, S, RB, RT. I think it's important to note that for FFMD I have Maualuga playing SLB and Taze playing MLB. Which would leave us with WLB as our biggest need at the LB position, and finding a three down backer who can play in our nickel packages is very important.

Depth needs and upgrades possible are at WR, Backup QB, KR and OG. All those position could use and impact player and depth guys who can provide us with solid backups but they certainly aren't pressing needs and should be addressed if we can find good value not otherwise.



All sounds right to me, as far as Codes go its up to you I really don't have a opinion!
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Beck Bristow


Moderator
Joined: 17 Dec 2005
Posts: 6845
PostPosted: Sun Apr 07, 2013 9:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Codes annoyed me last time.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
IDOG_det


Moderator
Joined: 02 Mar 2009
Posts: 36892
PostPosted: Sun Apr 07, 2013 10:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Is Leon Hall available or would I have to blow you guys away to get consideration?
_________________

"Strength is meaningless in o-line play if there is no explosive, or speed-strength, quality to the strength."
- LeCharles Bentley

R.I.P. Stylish
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
THE DUKE


Joined: 28 Feb 2005
Posts: 17840
Location: Centerville, OH
PostPosted: Sun Apr 07, 2013 10:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

IDOG_det wrote:
Is Leon Hall available or would I have to blow you guys away to get consideration?


Calvin Johnson probably gets it done.
_________________

-There are no men like me, only me.
-"Our life is what our thoughts make it" - Marcus Aurelius
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ark23


Joined: 04 Dec 2012
Posts: 1976
Location: Columbus, Ohio
PostPosted: Sun Apr 07, 2013 11:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

IDOG_det wrote:
Is Leon Hall available or would I have to blow you guys away to get consideration?
Feel free to make an offer but I think all of us would have to be floored to even consider dealing him.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ochocinco4pres


Joined: 04 Apr 2007
Posts: 26420
Location: Indianapolis Indiana
PostPosted: Sun Apr 07, 2013 11:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ark23 wrote:
IDOG_det wrote:
Is Leon Hall available or would I have to blow you guys away to get consideration?
Feel free to make an offer but I think all of us would have to be floored to even consider dealing him.


Agreed
_________________


Big thanks to kacymcbryant18 for the sig....^^
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wrminning


Joined: 06 Jan 2007
Posts: 2546
Location: Cincinnati
PostPosted: Mon Apr 08, 2013 7:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

THE DUKE wrote:
IDOG_det wrote:
Is Leon Hall available or would I have to blow you guys away to get consideration?


Calvin Johnson probably gets it done.


Calvin Johnson or a 1st, 2nd and 3rd would be considered
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
BengalsEra


Joined: 31 Dec 2012
Posts: 351
PostPosted: Mon Apr 08, 2013 9:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I personally believe that our biggest need is at S rather than LB. That's just my opinion. I also believe that we need to get a quality receiver in this draft.

As for the trades so far, id say no to all of them.

I like the codes, especially if they're creative like they were last time. I don't want them if you're just gonna use numbers like the giants used.

For RT, maybe we could take a guy like chris faulk with pick 53.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sparky151


Joined: 07 Feb 2012
Posts: 2797
Location: Columbus, OH
PostPosted: Mon Apr 08, 2013 10:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm not worried about RT. In this mock we don't have Andre signed but nobody else does either. His leverage goes way down after the draft so it's not a bad thing for us. IMO we can ignore RT in the mock and expect that after the draft we'd sign either Andre or one of the other vet RTs currently available. Those would be guys like Tyson Clabo, Eric Winston, Bryant McKinnie, Max Starks, Ryan Harris, etc.

In real life the front office probably won't draft Andre's replacement so why should we? If the Bengals take a tackle, it's to upgrade from Roland.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TheVillain112


Moderator
Joined: 19 Feb 2010
Posts: 21750
PostPosted: Mon Apr 08, 2013 11:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Beck Bristow wrote:
Codes annoyed me last time.


You heard the man, more codes...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
THE DUKE


Joined: 28 Feb 2005
Posts: 17840
Location: Centerville, OH
PostPosted: Mon Apr 08, 2013 11:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

sparky151 wrote:
I'm not worried about RT. In this mock we don't have Andre signed but nobody else does either. His leverage goes way down after the draft so it's not a bad thing for us. IMO we can ignore RT in the mock and expect that after the draft we'd sign either Andre or one of the other vet RTs currently available. Those would be guys like Tyson Clabo, Eric Winston, Bryant McKinnie, Max Starks, Ryan Harris, etc.

In real life the front office probably won't draft Andre's replacement so why should we? If the Bengals take a tackle, it's to upgrade from Roland.


I agree with this.
_________________

-There are no men like me, only me.
-"Our life is what our thoughts make it" - Marcus Aurelius
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
johndeere1707


Joined: 01 Apr 2006
Posts: 7302
PostPosted: Mon Apr 08, 2013 2:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

TheVillain112 wrote:
Beck Bristow wrote:
Codes annoyed me last time.


You heard the man, more codes...


I say we make the slowest fattest whitest player in the drafts code name Beck Bristow
_________________


Thanks to mike23md for the sig
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Beck Bristow


Moderator
Joined: 17 Dec 2005
Posts: 6845
PostPosted: Mon Apr 08, 2013 6:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

johndeere1707 wrote:
TheVillain112 wrote:
Beck Bristow wrote:
Codes annoyed me last time.


You heard the man, more codes...


I say we make the slowest fattest player in the drafts code name Beck Bristow


I'm not sure that would work.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ark23


Joined: 04 Dec 2012
Posts: 1976
Location: Columbus, Ohio
PostPosted: Mon Apr 08, 2013 9:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I sent out the codes (thanks to johndeere from FFMD) - Beck if you don't like the codes you can speak in "non code" Wink

We pick at 12:00 on Wednesday. Thinking about who will realistically be available I'd say we should consider Jimmy Kimmel, Ratt, PTPer, the situation, Wrangler Jeans, and the transfer. I'm lower on them but I'm sure you guys will want to look at Scarlett Johansson, Tim Hardaway SR's Beanie, and the Pedigree.

Remember we have the ammo to move up and can certainly move down.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jetskid007


Joined: 09 Jan 2006
Posts: 10873
PostPosted: Tue Apr 09, 2013 6:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Interest in moving up?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Cincinnati Bengals All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4 ... 27, 28, 29  Next
Page 3 of 29

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group