You are currently viewing the old forums. We have upgraded to a new NFL Forum.
This old forum is being left as a read-only archive.
Please update your bookmarks to our new forum at forums.footballsfuture.com.


 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

FFMD 13 (Part II): GDT *Winner Announced pg.87*
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4 ... 87, 88, 89  Next
 
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> GM Mock Drafts
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
wayne87reggie


Joined: 03 Mar 2009
Posts: 16465
Location: CL on the sig
PostPosted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 2:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

TheVillain112 wrote:
wayne87reggie wrote:
Looks good, but not sure you need to include revoke clause!?


We've run into issues before with GMs/AGM/other team members not all being on the same page. Figure I would add that in to clear up any confusion. I pretty much expect a member of a staff to select a player and then the rest of the staff to want someone else...


I just don't see it being that big of an issue! If members want another player, they can get them in an hour!(maybe)..
_________________

Colts 2015-2020 Roster/Cap
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
quietjetsket


Joined: 20 Sep 2012
Posts: 4078
PostPosted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 2:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

wayne87reggie wrote:
quietjetsket wrote:
TheVillain112 wrote:
wayne87reggie wrote:
Looks good, but not sure you need to include revoke clause!?


We've run into issues before with GMs/AGM/other team members not all being on the same page. Figure I would add that in to clear up any confusion. I pretty much expect a member of a staff to select a player and then the rest of the staff to want someone else...


I suggest not because another team (who already claimed on different prospect) may want a taken prospect. Developing a chain of revoked and new taken is the last thing you want to witness.

If you want a revoke clause then you need to set up a rule for that. Like a prospect won't be available for 2 hours after being revoked. Or something like that.


That was my first initial reaction as well! I think probably shouldn't be at all, but if so their should be a penalty,( have to wait 2 hours to put in a bid or something...?

It will cause a chain of reaction and be tough to track!


Without salary indication, how could we get penalized for it?


If 2 hour is too short to slow down UDFA frenzy then what do you think of 6pm of next day?

I still think this revoke clause needs to be canceled out anyway. 2 reasons..

1. member activity will be slowing down after 5th round, give or take.

2. UDFA is always low priority.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TheVillain112


Moderator
Joined: 19 Feb 2010
Posts: 21750
PostPosted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 3:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Let me think about it. We will either need the revoke clause that's currently there or we will need to specifically state that once you place a winning claim that you can't revoke it.

Having nothing to state either way will lead to people trying to game the system...


Last edited by TheVillain112 on Fri Mar 29, 2013 3:05 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wayne87reggie


Joined: 03 Mar 2009
Posts: 16465
Location: CL on the sig
PostPosted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 3:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

quietjetsket wrote:
wayne87reggie wrote:

That was my first initial reaction as well! I think probably shouldn't be at all, but if so their should be a penalty,( have to wait 2 hours to put in a bid or something...?

It will cause a chain of reaction and be tough to track!


Without salary indication, how could we get penalized for it?


If 2 hour is too short to slow down UDFA frenzy then what do you think of 6pm of next day?

I still think this revoke clause needs to be canceled out anyway. 2 reasons..

1. member activity will be slowing down after 5th round, give or take.

2. UDFA is always low priority.


I think 2 hour penalty would end all of revokes anyway, why would you revoke a claim and have to wait 2 hours to put in another bid, when you can just claim another guy in another hour!! But yeah I don't think teams should be able to revoke claims either!
_________________

Colts 2015-2020 Roster/Cap
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
quietjetsket


Joined: 20 Sep 2012
Posts: 4078
PostPosted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 3:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Question? Are those rules locked? Or are we discussing for better feasible rule regarding UDFA portion?

I have to ask because Wayne was about to burn my house down for discussing his rules in his mock. lol.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TheVillain112


Moderator
Joined: 19 Feb 2010
Posts: 21750
PostPosted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 3:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

quietjetsket wrote:
Question? Are those rules locked? Or are we discussing for better feasible rule regarding UDFA portion?

I have to ask because Wayne was about to burn my house down for discussing his rules in his mock. lol.


Rules aren't locked (yet). It's about having fun, so I want to make sure the rules make sense. Plus I just created the entire UDFA rules section yesterday, lol...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
KJtheWicked


Joined: 30 Dec 2007
Posts: 1909
Location: Norrisville, Pa
PostPosted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 3:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Secret threads? They made things much easier to communicate with the entire staff, instead of trying to keep track of individual PM's. Anyone who wanted a link to it, usually got one, with the exception of course of staff members of other teams. Plus, it created a game within the game of trying to find opposing teams' secret threads! Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
quietjetsket


Joined: 20 Sep 2012
Posts: 4078
PostPosted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 3:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

TheVillain112 wrote:
quietjetsket wrote:
Question? Are those rules locked? Or are we discussing for better feasible rule regarding UDFA portion?

I have to ask because Wayne was about to burn my house down for discussing his rules in his mock. lol.


Rules aren't locked (yet). It's about having fun, so I want to make sure the rules make sense. Plus I just created the entire UDFA rules section yesterday, lol...


Cool! I just read through this thread. PM rule is uncontrollably ridiculous. lol.

1 hour claim worked out just fine in Wayne mock but it won't for every team. We need to do something about time period where 32 teams can participate. Poaching 10 UFDA before a team finally get involved in the evening is kind of overkill.

Maybe 6-12 nightly.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
green24


Joined: 10 Apr 2010
Posts: 47615
PostPosted: Sun Mar 31, 2013 1:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

JammerHammer21 wrote:
I, JammerHammer21, would like to be GM of the Chargers.
uh oh
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
IDOG_det


Moderator
Joined: 02 Mar 2009
Posts: 36892
PostPosted: Sun Mar 31, 2013 1:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

green24 wrote:
JammerHammer21 wrote:
I, JammerHammer21, would like to be GM of the Chargers.
uh oh
That ain't nothin'
_________________

"Strength is meaningless in o-line play if there is no explosive, or speed-strength, quality to the strength."
- LeCharles Bentley

R.I.P. Stylish
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TheVillain112


Moderator
Joined: 19 Feb 2010
Posts: 21750
PostPosted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 2:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I will have a rose ceremony tomorrow to annonce the GM/Writer "winners"...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tatupu_64


Moderator
Joined: 05 Apr 2007
Posts: 26321
Location: Hello. My name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die.
PostPosted: Tue Apr 02, 2013 1:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

green24 wrote:
JammerHammer21 wrote:
I, JammerHammer21, would like to be GM of the Chargers.
uh oh
Battle of the tweens.
_________________
<Rammy

#1 ET Supporter
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
green24


Joined: 10 Apr 2010
Posts: 47615
PostPosted: Tue Apr 02, 2013 2:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tatupu_64 wrote:
green24 wrote:
JammerHammer21 wrote:
I, JammerHammer21, would like to be GM of the Chargers.
uh oh
Battle of the tweens.
I'm not a GM this time around.

And I just turned 17 yesterday. Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
chisoxguy7


Joined: 17 Dec 2007
Posts: 4051
Location: Chicago
PostPosted: Tue Apr 02, 2013 3:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

green24 wrote:
Tatupu_64 wrote:
green24 wrote:
JammerHammer21 wrote:
I, JammerHammer21, would like to be GM of the Chargers.
uh oh
Battle of the tweens.
I'm not a GM this time around.

And I just turned 17 yesterday. Laughing


You're just a young'n
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nugpimpen


Joined: 18 Feb 2006
Posts: 28488
Location: 10 Miles South of Cleveland
PostPosted: Tue Apr 02, 2013 2:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

TheVillain112 wrote:
I will have a rose ceremony tomorrow to annonce the GM/Writer "winners"...


What time is the parade of roses?
_________________

2015 Adopt-A-Brown:
Joe Thomas, GOAT
Christian Kirksey, ILB
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> GM Mock Drafts All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4 ... 87, 88, 89  Next
Page 3 of 89

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group