| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
skrILL
Joined: 29 Jul 2011
Posts: 3795
Location: El ramster on the sig
|
 Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2013 3:32 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
The Chiefs are trying to be a bit too cute IMO. Like someone else said they're making this OL situation way more complicated than it has to be.
_________________
N E W Y O R K J E T S |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
simonwayne
Joined: 11 Sep 2011
Posts: 14731
Location: United States
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2013 3:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| skrILL wrote: | | The Chiefs are trying to be a bit too cute IMO. Like someone else said they're making this OL situation way more complicated than it has to be. |
Albert has also made it hard for them. After Winston was released he posted some things on twitter about refusing to move to RT and then deleted his twitter.
_________________
Sigbet with El Ramster; OKC wins title = I win. IND wins title = he wins. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
game3525
Joined: 03 Oct 2009
Posts: 7429
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2013 3:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I don't know WTF KC is doing at the moment.
To me it made more sense to keep Albert at LT and keep Winston at RT and draft Jordan. Your in a division with Peyton Manning, it might be smart to load up on the pass-rushers. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
steelcurtain29
Joined: 04 Oct 2007
Posts: 35167
Location: Monongahela, PA
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2013 3:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| TheVillain112 wrote: | | Translation: We're taking a LT #1 overall and Albert is going to be a pain if we ask him to move to RT. So anyone want to take him off of our hands? |
Actually, Albert would be much more effective at LG; which he is excellent at. I'm sure they'd rather explore options since he's proven at both OG and LT and can be effective at both, plus there is a possibility of him leaving.
Chiefs would rather keep him. If they can get a high pick and use it on a younger OT / OG; they'll do that as well.
_________________
3DS Friend Code
4038-6129-7897
Pokemon X |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DT58_lives_on
Joined: 04 Jan 2007
Posts: 5824
Location: Oshkosh, WI
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2013 3:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Winston was released to save money, and move to a more athletic pass blocking RT. WINSTON was fairly awful last year in that aspect. Not to mention he had a huge contract for a RT.
I could easily see KC still extend Albert. Remember all this discussion us coming off Peter King saying he thinks KC will listen. If we don't get a deal we like, we keep him. It's not like we're desperate to trade him. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
vikingsrule
Joined: 15 Nov 2005
Posts: 48934
Location: Land of 10,000 Lakes!
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2013 4:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Archimedes wrote: | Taking Joekel at 1 overall would have to be one of the more uninspiring uses of a number 1 pick that I can remember in recent history.
My hope would be that the Chiefs could trade out of 1 to 2, 3, or 4 and get back that 2nd rounder, and use the money they save on Albert to add one more piece in FA (Osi, Elvis, or Lloyd). But these are the Chiefs, so I won't be holding my breath. |
Any pick the chiefs make will be one of the most uninspiring pick one could make in history. There is literally not a worthy first overall pick this year and whoever is selected will feel very underwhelming. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Billy Spikes
Joined: 12 Jul 2008
Posts: 41344
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
The LBC
Joined: 12 Jan 2008
Posts: 26097
Location: Where We Can't Have Nice Things
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2013 5:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| DT58_lives_on wrote: | Winston was released to save money, and move to a more athletic pass blocking RT. WINSTON was fairly awful last year in that aspect. Not to mention he had a huge contract for a RT.
I could easily see KC still extend Albert. Remember all this discussion us coming off Peter King saying he thinks KC will listen. If we don't get a deal we like, we keep him. It's not like we're desperate to trade him. |
Not really. He was being paid on average what most starting RT's who aren't currently playing on a rookie contract are making (~$5 million/yr), a standard set by David Diehl in 2008. And considering that Winston was signed in a post rookie wage scale era (when there was an inflation on veteran new contract values), he was actually at a slight bargain price.
_________________
| wackywabbit wrote: | | Playing center for the Chargers is like teaching DADA at Hogwarts. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JammerHammer21
Joined: 27 Dec 2009
Posts: 28991
Location: Anywhere
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2013 5:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| game3525 wrote: | I don't know WTF KC is doing at the moment.
To me it made more sense to keep Albert at LT and keep Winston at RT and draft Jordan. Your in a division with Peyton Manning, it might be smart to load up on the pass-rushers. |
Houston and Hali. Floyd, Lotuleilei, or hell, Richardson would be better.
_________________
| Bohlmann20 (On The 95 Cleveland Browns Staff) wrote: | | Lombardi - Isn't that the guy the trophy is named after? If so, top 3 coach of all time. |
#JDI |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
simonwayne
Joined: 11 Sep 2011
Posts: 14731
Location: United States
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2013 5:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I'll take it. I like Albert and when healthy he is a top 10 LT but Joeckel or Fisher are better options at this point if we can get a 2nd in return for Albert.
_________________
Sigbet with El Ramster; OKC wins title = I win. IND wins title = he wins. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Withmy89vision
Joined: 07 Aug 2007
Posts: 3597
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2013 5:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I'd trade a third, but there is so much oline talent Eagles can get someone early 2nd who won't cost what Albert does
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Emerica
Joined: 12 Nov 2011
Posts: 1444
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2013 6:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
For a 2nd? Meh, no thank you.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Rearviewmirror
Joined: 24 Jan 2009
Posts: 18836
Location: ^^Tamba waiting on his next feast in the Avy Ryk on the sig
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2013 6:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| steelcurtain29 wrote: | | TheVillain112 wrote: | | Translation: We're taking a LT #1 overall and Albert is going to be a pain if we ask him to move to RT. So anyone want to take him off of our hands? |
Actually, Albert would be much more effective at LG; which he is excellent at. I'm sure they'd rather explore options since he's proven at both OG and LT and can be effective at both, plus there is a possibility of him leaving.
Chiefs would rather keep him. If they can get a high pick and use it on a younger OT / OG; they'll do that as well. |
foolishness. Albert would not be better at G. I don't know why people keep suggesting this. Albert is a great pass blocking LT. You don't move those kinds of guys.
_________________
| les paul wrote: | There's only one thing that determines a teams performance on any given sunday
Their opponent- |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Billy Spikes
Joined: 12 Jul 2008
Posts: 41344
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
chiefs82
Joined: 19 Jan 2007
Posts: 4567
Location: Your Mom's House.
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 21, 2013 2:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Welp. I hope its Fisher over Joeckel.
_________________
________________
ryknowssd on the sig
2014 Adopt-A-Chief: #50 Justin Houston, OLB
Tackles:68/Sacks:22/FF:4 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
#JDI
