| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
justo
Joined: 05 Aug 2012
Posts: 13582
|
 Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2013 3:53 pm Post subject: Ahmad Bradshaw? |
 |
|
|
| Quote: | @AdamSchefter
Packers and Steelers have expressed interest in former Giants RB Ahmad Bradshaw. |
inb4 heartbreak
_________________
| Webmaster wrote: | | The difference is that this is a FOOTBALL forum. Heated debates about FOOTBALL are expected and encouraged. If you want to discuss your cure for Ebola, try ebolasfuture.com or any other appropriate forum. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Roscoe
Joined: 25 Oct 2008
Posts: 114
Location: Green Bay
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2013 3:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Here we go again............!!!!!!!!!!😆😆😆😆😆😆will be a Steeler were to cheap to sign him too!
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Cheesehead430
Joined: 29 Jan 2006
Posts: 15197
Location: 414/813
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2013 3:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
If he checks out physically yes.
_________________
Go Pack Go...
#Unconquered |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Apodrocks
Joined: 29 Dec 2008
Posts: 6410
Location: Detroit, Michigan.
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2013 3:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Well that tweet means he'll be a Steeler.
_________________
^Packerbacker87 on the sig, thanks! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
2Bigby0
Joined: 02 Mar 2008
Posts: 647
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2013 3:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| He upgrades the RB position. If it's affordable and a 1-2 year deal, I don't see why you don't make this move. As long as he checks out medically of course. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pollino14
Joined: 14 Jan 2006
Posts: 16885
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2013 3:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I'm passing. I don't think he s the type of back we need, nor is he that good to begin with.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
GoPackGo25
Joined: 26 Feb 2008
Posts: 6306
Location: packerbacker87 on the avy!
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2013 4:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Meh, he's been prone to fumbling. I'd rather go Bell, Bernard or Ball in the draft in all honesty.
_________________
Credit: TheDeeeeej |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CallMeBarrett
Joined: 04 Jan 2011
Posts: 786
Location: Gainesville, Florida
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2013 4:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Here we go again.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DavidatMIZZOU
Joined: 09 Apr 2009
Posts: 10518
Location: The ZOU
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2013 4:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Wanted Bush or Jackson as FAs. Otherwise, give me Christine Michael.
I'm not as against Bradshaw as I am Hillis. But the excitement level is the same as with Cedric Benson, about zero.
_________________
GO PACK GO!
| mistakebytehlak wrote: |
My god it must be so terrible to have three teams that consistently make the playoffs |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
2Bigby0
Joined: 02 Mar 2008
Posts: 647
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2013 4:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Ahmad Bradshaw is a lot better player than you guys are giving him credit for. He's not at the same level as Bush or Jackson, but he's a legitmate starter in this league. Especially in an offense like the Packers where he won't be 'shouldering' a bunch of carries. Bradshaw excels in pass protection as well as a receiving threat. Not to mention, he has a career 4.6 YPC.
He's had some foot injuries but he fought through them. I give guys like that a lot of credit. He's missed 12 games in his 6 year career. If injury proned is missing 2 games a season, I'll take that.
Who is to say we couldn't sign Bradshaw and still draft one of the top backs available in the draft? In my opinion, there really isn't much of a reason to keep any RB on the roster besides Harris. Bring in as much competition as we can at RB because the last two seasons have not worked out the way they hoped RB by committee would go.
Last edited by 2Bigby0 on Sun Mar 17, 2013 4:18 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
arodgers12
Joined: 27 Feb 2008
Posts: 431
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2013 4:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
We need to do something at running back what do we have to lose!
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
GBPackers79
Joined: 20 Jan 2007
Posts: 20112
Location: New Jersey
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2013 4:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
He's 26 years old and rushed for 1,015 yards in 14 games last year, 4.6 YPC. 2010 he averaged 4.5 YPC and put up 1,235 yards with 8 TDs.
Why wouldn't we want that? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ketchup
Joined: 13 May 2009
Posts: 14757
Location: Milwaukee, WI
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2013 4:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| GBPackers79 wrote: | He's 26 years old and rushed for 1,015 yards in 14 games last year, 4.6 YPC. 2010 he averaged 4.5 YPC and put up 1,235 yards with 8 TDs.
Why wouldn't we want that? |
Exactly. He has his share of foot issues but he plays through it almost all the time and still puts about about 4.5 YPC. That's a guy I want on this team. Before free agency even began, I said I wanted Bradshaw over any FA RB.
_________________
Kempes on the custom sig! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Cheesehead430
Joined: 29 Jan 2006
Posts: 15197
Location: 414/813
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2013 4:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| GBPackers79 wrote: | He's 26 years old and rushed for 1,015 yards in 14 games last year, 4.6 YPC. 2010 he averaged 4.5 YPC and put up 1,235 yards with 8 TDs.
Why wouldn't we want that? |
Injury concerns.
Although outside of injuries he the best RB in this FA class IMO, his age being the biggest factor.
_________________
Go Pack Go...
#Unconquered |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nmesser13
Joined: 23 Feb 2007
Posts: 258
Location: North Dakota
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2013 4:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Ain't going to happen cause he won't sign for the verteran's minimum we're going to be offering. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
