| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Billy Spikes
Joined: 12 Jul 2008
Posts: 38455
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mcmurtry86
Joined: 02 Mar 2010
Posts: 22304
|
 Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2013 6:19 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| He's lost a step but still a better kick returner than anyone the Pats have had for years |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
NextBigThing
Joined: 26 Oct 2009
Posts: 20447
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2013 6:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Yup, he will do well here. Also interested to see him out of the backfield. Excluding Demps, Washington is much faster than anybody else we have. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BP
Joined: 14 Feb 2011
Posts: 2323
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2013 6:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| sweet bu-bye edelman? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
PatriotsWin!
Joined: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 17771
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2013 6:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Much rather have signed Edelman. Seems like a waste to have Washington be a KR/PR only (we already have enough backs)
_________________
Mack on the sig |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
PoWww
Joined: 28 Feb 2013
Posts: 1101
Location: City Of Champions
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2013 6:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| mcmurtry86 wrote: | | He's lost a step but still a better kick returner than anyone the Pats have had for years |
My thoughts exactly. Solid veteran to have on your team as well. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Deadpulse
Joined: 16 Oct 2008
Posts: 8054
Location: Boston MA
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2013 6:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| PatriotsWin! wrote: | | Much rather have signed Edelman. Seems like a waste to have Washington be a KR/PR only (we already have enough backs) |
Well Slater has been used on returns, albeit sparringly. He is also more a ST than a WR but why have 2 WR's on roster who are mostly ST, even if one is a returner?
Demps is mostly likely gone now, and Woody might also be left in the cold.
_________________
Sigs
Patriots Red Sox Celtics |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
I_GET_SAX
Joined: 17 Nov 2012
Posts: 5050
Location: The Granite State
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2013 6:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Does Washington, outside of adding a better returner, have any Sproles/Faulk (Kevin) in him at? Being quick, agile and can come from backfield and do a version of what WW did in the receiving game. With him and Amendola, is it possible we can replace WWs catches/numbers from elsewhere?
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BP
Joined: 14 Feb 2011
Posts: 2323
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2013 6:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| I_GET_SAX wrote: | | Does Washington, outside of adding a better returner, have any Sproles/Faulk (Kevin) in him at? Being quick, agile and can come from backfield and do a version of what WW did in the receiving game. With him and Amendola, is it possible we can replace WWs catches/numbers from elsewhere? |
does he? sure why not. will he be that? doubtful. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dhunt2402
Joined: 24 Nov 2007
Posts: 20243
Location: The District
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2013 7:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Might be the end of Danny Woodcock rather than Edelman.
_________________
Deadpulse on the sig |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
adesilva
Joined: 16 Nov 2008
Posts: 2901
Location: MA
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2013 7:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| dhunt2402 wrote: | | Might be the end of Danny Woodcock rather than Edelman. |
Ya that's more what I was thinking too. I hope they still resign Edelman
Vereen is ready to replace Woodhead as a rb. Having Leon as a KR/PR ( unless Edelman is back) and a backup RB isn't a bad deal ... assuming it isnt for much money |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Troy Brown
Joined: 21 Feb 2008
Posts: 23907
Location: Newport, Rhode Island
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 3:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Why would this mean the end of Edelman? Edelman does literally everything for you. Washington will be used in the return game and possibly in the backfield sparingly.
Edelman gives you great ST play, good PRing, serviceable receiving, emergency DB, ettcetcetctetcec
edit: used literally just for you, mcmurtry
_________________
MAYBE YOUR BEST COURSE WOULD BE TO TREAD LIGHTLY
ELRammy
Last edited by Troy Brown on Fri Mar 15, 2013 4:03 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
HOVA333
Joined: 11 Mar 2007
Posts: 4748
Location: Brockton MA Richard Sherman is a Pansy
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 4:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Troy Brown wrote: | Why would this mean the end of Edelman? Edelman does literally everything for you. Washington will be used in the return game and possibly in the backfield sparingly.
Edelman gives you great ST play, good PRing, serviceable receiving, emergency DB, ettcetcetctetcec |
yea, BB wouldnt throw away versatility would he??
_________________
Adopt A Patriot
Logan Ryan : CB
Tkls: Int: FF: |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Troy Brown
Joined: 21 Feb 2008
Posts: 23907
Location: Newport, Rhode Island
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 4:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
it doesn't make sense to me to ditch edelman. if we're going to kick the tires on vet min type of WRs, why wouldn't we bring back one of the more productive guys we've had on offense recently who already fits in?
and that's not even bringing up what he does for you everywhere else. i'm going to be disappointed if edelman isn't resigned.
_________________
MAYBE YOUR BEST COURSE WOULD BE TO TREAD LIGHTLY
ELRammy |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BP
Joined: 14 Feb 2011
Posts: 2323
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 10:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
I highly doubt theyre ditching Edelman now guys, we need him for a variety of reasons not including having one injury prone slot type receiver to fill in for the other, amendola!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
#JDI
