| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Kempes
Joined: 12 Sep 2009
Posts: 11189
|
 Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2013 9:03 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| birdman0069 wrote: | | Kempes wrote: | Taking the glass half full stance on Sopoaga is just pointless, ''oh SF don't want him so why would we want him.... scrapheap signing'' etc...
SF have had many good years out of him, there has to come a time when they want to move on. Is Ed Reed a bad player because it looks like the Ravens are moving on from him? SF are in a great position now. They have endless amounts of draft picks to build for the future. Sopoaga was there for 8 years. Every cycle ends and that's what they're doing now. They'll find their new guy who will come in and play for another 8 years while they have a golden opportunity to do so.
Departing with Sopoaga isn't going to turn their D to crud, he's expendable, but that doesn't mean he's a bad player. I'm sure they could have got at least another 2 years out of him but moving on from him at this stage is the logical thing to do to ensure they keep their franchise moving. |
Go back a few pages. I said this was good signing.
I love the question, " is Ed Reed a bad player"? Of course not. But he isn't a great player anymore. If you think he hasn't lost a step you you would sadly mistaking.
Sopoaga is a nice transitional player, but that's it. Some people around here make this sound like the acquisition of the decade are are takin back by a report that he was the 4th best DT on the 49'ers last season. The reality is, the 49'ers won't miss a beat without him because he is a mediocre NT at best.
The difference is even being mediocre, he is better then anything else we currently have on this roster.
This is a nice signing. It will get us pointed in the right direction, but, he won't be here in 2 years time and this isn't a great signing of a great player. |
Yeah just saw that, I didn't mean it directly to you man, I was just getting an uneasy feeling from the thread.
I know Reed has definitely lost a step but someone is going to get a good year or two out of him, just like I hope we will with Sopoaga.
_________________
| Bednarik60 wrote: | | BRB, googles 170 lbs Kempsey, only to find out 170 lbs Kempsey ate Bacons finger at a Tex-Mex buffet in Arizona. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Phire
Joined: 12 Jan 2007
Posts: 46291
Location: #championchip #2012BirdsHoF #2012GoldStnd #YAKtoseIntolerant #Merica #TrollyRangers #Danes #BirdGang
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2013 10:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
For what it's worth he might not even be the starter come next season. Had we signed RJF, wouldn't he have taken first string snaps? From what I can muster, it sounds like Sopoaga was more rotational than a starter at San Fran.
If we're getting a Star Lotulelei or potentially someone else between now and the end of April, Sopoaga is a good guy to have on your depth chart. Knowledgeable, experienced, hard working, and healthy.
_________________
| theuntouchable wrote: | | Think about this phire. I am the real chow. |
| RainbowCarebear wrote: | | Only for the quick and lucky. |
Danish proverb 3:69 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SiLo
Joined: 05 Sep 2009
Posts: 11353
Location: Dade County
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2013 1:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Only signing I like so far. Could be a solid presence.
_________________
Bird Watch: Brandon Boykin
27 TACKLES 0 SACK 1 FF 2 INT |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
WhackyPlague
Joined: 25 May 2008
Posts: 4613
Location: South Carolina
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2013 1:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Phire wrote: | For what it's worth he might not even be the starter come next season. Had we signed RJF, wouldn't he have taken first string snaps? From what I can muster, it sounds like Sopoaga was more rotational than a starter at San Fran.
If we're getting a Star Lotulelei or potentially someone else between now and the end of April, Sopoaga is a good guy to have on your depth chart. Knowledgeable, experienced, hard working, and healthy. |
RJF is more of an end than a nose tackle, so I think the planned starters along the line would have been Cox/Sopoaga/Jean-Francois.
In any case, Sopoaga is a stop-gap. He'll probably start if we don't add anyone else at NT, but I could easily see even a second-day pick at NT pushing him to a rotational role. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RainbowCarebear
Joined: 31 Aug 2011
Posts: 29437
Location: Phire on the Avatar & SiLo on the Sig
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2013 2:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| WhackyPlague wrote: | | Phire wrote: | For what it's worth he might not even be the starter come next season. Had we signed RJF, wouldn't he have taken first string snaps? From what I can muster, it sounds like Sopoaga was more rotational than a starter at San Fran.
If we're getting a Star Lotulelei or potentially someone else between now and the end of April, Sopoaga is a good guy to have on your depth chart. Knowledgeable, experienced, hard working, and healthy. |
RJF is more of an end than a nose tackle, so I think the planned starters along the line would have been Cox/Sopoaga/Jean-Francois.
In any case, Sopoaga is a stop-gap. He'll probably start if we don't add anyone else at NT, but I could easily see even a second-day pick at NT pushing him to a rotational role. |
NT already is a rotational role. Soap only played 31% of SF snaps last year
_________________
Bird Watch: Cedric Thornton
Tackles: 49 Sack: 1 PDef: 2 | marky_b27 wrote: | | The Dane's gonna Dane |
#1MM |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dr. Philly
Joined: 02 Nov 2009
Posts: 30040
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2013 4:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Love Isaac.
_________________
| simonwayne wrote: | | LeBron has done for the NBA what Teen Mom has done for teenage pregnancies |
#JDI |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RBrown86
Joined: 08 Mar 2007
Posts: 22581
Location: Philadelphia, PA
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2013 6:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
He's going to clear up a ton of space for DeMeco and Kendricks.
_________________
^Thanks to McNabbNo5 for the sig, Phire for the avy |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jroc04
Joined: 19 Mar 2008
Posts: 9612
Location: South Jersey
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2013 6:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I like Kendricks but I don't think he success in this defense. Stinks, I was high on him.
_________________
Kilt sig - 808 avy
| 808 wrote: | | Jroc offers a voice of reason, and that's why I care about him so much. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Nabbs4u
Joined: 28 Jul 2007
Posts: 21406
Location: Carolina Kiltman on the Sig
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2013 7:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Jroc04 wrote: | | I like Kendricks but I don't think he success in this defense. Stinks, I was high on him. |
Why woud Kendricks struggle in a 3-4/4-3 under?
_________________
Bird Watch: Mike Vick
QT missed: 29^Att 77-141^55%^1216 Pass Yds ^5 TD^2 INT}{34 Att^308 Rush yds^2 TD^2 FB |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dr. Philly
Joined: 02 Nov 2009
Posts: 30040
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2013 7:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Nabbs4u wrote: | | Jroc04 wrote: | | I like Kendricks but I don't think he success in this defense. Stinks, I was high on him. |
Why woud Kendricks struggle in a 3-4/4-3 under? |
Does he even have a starting spot?
_________________
| simonwayne wrote: | | LeBron has done for the NBA what Teen Mom has done for teenage pregnancies |
#JDI |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jroc04
Joined: 19 Mar 2008
Posts: 9612
Location: South Jersey
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2013 7:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Nabbs4u wrote: | | Jroc04 wrote: | | I like Kendricks but I don't think he success in this defense. Stinks, I was high on him. |
Why woud Kendricks struggle in a 3-4/4-3 under? |
He's small. I imagine he's going to see a lot of second level blockers.
_________________
Kilt sig - 808 avy
| 808 wrote: | | Jroc offers a voice of reason, and that's why I care about him so much. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Nabbs4u
Joined: 28 Jul 2007
Posts: 21406
Location: Carolina Kiltman on the Sig
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2013 7:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Dr. Philly wrote: | | Nabbs4u wrote: | | Jroc04 wrote: | | I like Kendricks but I don't think he success in this defense. Stinks, I was high on him. |
Why woud Kendricks struggle in a 3-4/4-3 under? |
Does he even have a starting spot? |
Not knowing what's in store from kelly would he not fit as a athletic ILB next to Mecco? Better question in my eyes is where does Graham, Cole, Hunt, Curry fit in this with the Barwin addition, No?
_________________
Bird Watch: Mike Vick
QT missed: 29^Att 77-141^55%^1216 Pass Yds ^5 TD^2 INT}{34 Att^308 Rush yds^2 TD^2 FB |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Phire
Joined: 12 Jan 2007
Posts: 46291
Location: #championchip #2012BirdsHoF #2012GoldStnd #YAKtoseIntolerant #Merica #TrollyRangers #Danes #BirdGang
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2013 7:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Kendricks needs to get bigger for sure. If I'm an offensive coordinator and I'm picking where to run the ball, it's right at Kendricks at the moment.
_________________
| theuntouchable wrote: | | Think about this phire. I am the real chow. |
| RainbowCarebear wrote: | | Only for the quick and lucky. |
Danish proverb 3:69 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RainbowCarebear
Joined: 31 Aug 2011
Posts: 29437
Location: Phire on the Avatar & SiLo on the Sig
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2013 7:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Jroc04 wrote: | | Nabbs4u wrote: | | Jroc04 wrote: | | I like Kendricks but I don't think he success in this defense. Stinks, I was high on him. |
Why woud Kendricks struggle in a 3-4/4-3 under? |
He's small. I imagine he's going to see a lot of second level blockers. |
He's 240. Same as P willy and bowman... And if we're going to run the same D as Cards kendricks will be the WILB and often the player who's not blocked
_________________
Bird Watch: Cedric Thornton
Tackles: 49 Sack: 1 PDef: 2 | marky_b27 wrote: | | The Dane's gonna Dane |
#1MM |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Phire
Joined: 12 Jan 2007
Posts: 46291
Location: #championchip #2012BirdsHoF #2012GoldStnd #YAKtoseIntolerant #Merica #TrollyRangers #Danes #BirdGang
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2013 7:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| RainbowCarebear wrote: | | Jroc04 wrote: | | Nabbs4u wrote: | | Jroc04 wrote: | | I like Kendricks but I don't think he success in this defense. Stinks, I was high on him. |
Why woud Kendricks struggle in a 3-4/4-3 under? |
He's small. I imagine he's going to see a lot of second level blockers. |
He's 240. Same as P willy and bowman... And if we're going to run the same D as Cards kendricks will be the WILB and often the player who's not blocked |
They're completely different 240s.
vs
"Sup homie gonna take a pic with my iPad!"
_________________
| theuntouchable wrote: | | Think about this phire. I am the real chow. |
| RainbowCarebear wrote: | | Only for the quick and lucky. |
Danish proverb 3:69 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
