| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Phire
Joined: 12 Jan 2007
Posts: 39272
Location: #championchip 2012 HoF
|
 Posted: Thu Mar 07, 2013 3:58 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
He's hot and cold, with more cold spells than hot.
He's big, really big, and doesn't move well. It's also pretty clear he isn't the most confident guy. If he's doing well, he'll normally keep his name quiet for a stretch. But once he gets beat big time, expect more of the same until he somehow breaks out of it.
Very average tackle, should be a depth guy.
_________________
 | theuntouchable wrote: | | Think about this phire. I am the real chow. |
| stevec0008 wrote: | | I read all the time, and laugh, a lot. Mostly at oland. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Meco
Joined: 30 Aug 2012
Posts: 2319
Location: Las Vegas
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 9:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
I think we overstate just how bad King Dunlap is. He's a viable starting LT, he just gets lumped in with the rest of our crappy line because we were horrid at QB, C, RG and RT for most of the season. Dunlap was much, much better than DeMetress Bell. He's got a penchant for stupid penalties and he tends to let bad things snowball out of control (bad stretches) but across the board, he's probably better than a handful of left tackles in the NFL. He's not a right tackle or a guard, he's a left tackle, that's where he's been far most effective. Not good. Not great. Viable. Better than guys like David Diehl and whoever the hell the Bears and Cardinals send out. Low-end, you-can-get-by-with-him starter.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Eagles_808
Joined: 12 Mar 2008
Posts: 24807
Location: Torrance, CA
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 11:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Meco wrote: | | I think we overstate just how bad King Dunlap is. He's a viable starting LT, he just gets lumped in with the rest of our crappy line because we were horrid at QB, C, RG and RT for most of the season. Dunlap was much, much better than DeMetress Bell. He's got a penchant for stupid penalties and he tends to let bad things snowball out of control (bad stretches) but across the board, he's probably better than a handful of left tackles in the NFL. He's not a right tackle or a guard, he's a left tackle, that's where he's been far most effective. Not good. Not great. Viable. Better than guys like David Diehl and whoever the hell the Bears and Cardinals send out. Low-end, you-can-get-by-with-him starter. |
Then why didn't he start the entire year after Peters went down and Bell was deemed a failure?
I think he's a depth player only, not a "viable starter" in the NFL. Just IMO.
_________________
insignia by McNabbNo5 | #championCHIP | #Sparkles |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
AZ_Eaglesfan
Joined: 03 Jan 2013
Posts: 1120
Location: Arizona
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 12:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Meco wrote: | | I think we overstate just how bad King Dunlap is. He's a viable starting LT, he just gets lumped in with the rest of our crappy line because we were horrid at QB, C, RG and RT for most of the season. Dunlap was much, much better than DeMetress Bell. He's got a penchant for stupid penalties and he tends to let bad things snowball out of control (bad stretches) but across the board, he's probably better than a handful of left tackles in the NFL. He's not a right tackle or a guard, he's a left tackle, that's where he's been far most effective. Not good. Not great. Viable. Better than guys like David Diehl and whoever the hell the Bears and Cardinals send out. Low-end, you-can-get-by-with-him starter. |
No way in hell the Queen is a starter in this league. The guy can't move fast enough to get in front of the quick guys and he is so tall that the powerful guys can just use leverage to push him around. He is at best a depth guy, with his floor having him out of the league. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Eagles_808
Joined: 12 Mar 2008
Posts: 24807
Location: Torrance, CA
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 12:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| AZ_Eaglesfan wrote: | | No way in hell the Queen is a starter in this league. The guy can't move fast enough to get in front of the quick guys and he is so tall that the powerful guys can just use leverage to push him around. He is at best a depth guy, with his floor having him out of the league. |
Right. If only DEs bull rushed him on every single play, and used no leverage against his 6-8 frame, he might be a decent starter. Unfortunately he has trouble even talking about bending his knees, let alone actually doing it in a game.
_________________
insignia by McNabbNo5 | #championCHIP | #Sparkles |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Blahman88
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 21805
Location: DA BRITUSH IZLES
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 3:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Meco going against the grain as per........
Dunlap is a viable starter for team who doesn't want to win.
_________________
Officially endorsed by Jon Dorenbos
| RandyMossIsBoss wrote: | | I would do the same but I know better then to start beef with the EBB. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
