| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| ? |
| Yes |
|
4% |
[ 1 ] |
| No |
|
95% |
[ 23 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 24 |
|
| Author |
Message |
DaMike
Joined: 21 Nov 2010 Posts: 3345
|
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 10:44 am Post subject: Would you trade a 2nd and 4th to get Teo? |
|
|
|
| I would. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CBears019 
Joined: 03 Aug 2008 Posts: 14765 Location: Iowa City, IA
|
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 10:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
No. I'm not against drafting him, but I'm totally against spending essentially 60% of our draft on one guy. _________________ Martellus Bennet highlight video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5lP8fHN53t0 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mudderfudder77
Joined: 14 Jan 2005 Posts: 1292
|
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 10:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Dubya Tee Heffe?
Just a straight up trade? No way. I can get a comparable LB at 50, and then still use 4th on a developmental OL. Too much to give up. _________________
2013 Draft - Go TE or go home. Yes, TE, even after signing Bennett. Vance McDonald is your huckleberry. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Superman(DH23) 
Joined: 03 Jan 2008 Posts: 16410 Location: Abdi on the sick sig
|
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 10:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
He's not worth a 2nd to us, so why give up a 2nd AND a 4th? He's not a first round LBer dude. _________________
| OneBadCat wrote: | | Ahah Okay first of all Gamble was lost to IR this year but when healthy he proved to be 2nd only to Revis last season. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DaMike
Joined: 21 Nov 2010 Posts: 3345
|
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 11:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Superman(DH23) wrote: | | He's not worth a 2nd to us, so why give up a 2nd AND a 4th? He's not a first round LBer dude. | He's still a fringe 1st rounder and I guy I could still see being a 1st round pick. Let us benefit from his bad offseason. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Superman(DH23) 
Joined: 03 Jan 2008 Posts: 16410 Location: Abdi on the sick sig
|
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 11:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| DaMike wrote: | | Superman(DH23) wrote: | | He's not worth a 2nd to us, so why give up a 2nd AND a 4th? He's not a first round LBer dude. | He's still a fringe 1st rounder and I guy I could still see being a 1st round pick. Let us benefit from his bad offseason. | As we've discussed before he is a 3-4 ILB only. He does not have sideline to sideline speed, which he showed yesterday. He can't play in our scheme. _________________
| OneBadCat wrote: | | Ahah Okay first of all Gamble was lost to IR this year but when healthy he proved to be 2nd only to Revis last season. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DaMike
Joined: 21 Nov 2010 Posts: 3345
|
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 11:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Superman(DH23) wrote: | | DaMike wrote: | | Superman(DH23) wrote: | | He's not worth a 2nd to us, so why give up a 2nd AND a 4th? He's not a first round LBer dude. | He's still a fringe 1st rounder and I guy I could still see being a 1st round pick. Let us benefit from his bad offseason. | As we've discussed before he is a 3-4 ILB only. He does not have sideline to sideline speed, which he showed yesterday. He can't play in our scheme. | 3-4 ILB only? You obviously dont understand what is required from a 3-4 ILB in todays NFL. He can play in our scheme and every scheme. Im guessing you dont think Minter can play in our scheme either? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Superman(DH23) 
Joined: 03 Jan 2008 Posts: 16410 Location: Abdi on the sick sig
|
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 11:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| DaMike wrote: | | Superman(DH23) wrote: | | DaMike wrote: | | Superman(DH23) wrote: | | He's not worth a 2nd to us, so why give up a 2nd AND a 4th? He's not a first round LBer dude. | He's still a fringe 1st rounder and I guy I could still see being a 1st round pick. Let us benefit from his bad offseason. | As we've discussed before he is a 3-4 ILB only. He does not have sideline to sideline speed, which he showed yesterday. He can't play in our scheme. | 3-4 ILB only? You obviously dont understand what is required from a 3-4 ILB in todays NFL. He can play in our scheme and every scheme. Im guessing you dont think Minter can play in our scheme either? | I absolutely believe Minter can play in our scheme b/c he looks faster on tape than a 4.81 and still played very well against elite competition running a pro scheme. Te'o did not, and looked everybit his 4.82 on tape. But the guy I'm really interested in (and have been looking at him for a while) is Bostic. _________________
| OneBadCat wrote: | | Ahah Okay first of all Gamble was lost to IR this year but when healthy he proved to be 2nd only to Revis last season. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MonserinNC 
Joined: 18 Jan 2006 Posts: 4954 Location: Back in the CHIIII
|
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 11:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Haha, what kind of question is ths? _________________
| BrotherlyLove wrote: | | Cutler isn't sexy enough to be compared to sexy rexy, let's get real |
| Darrelle Revis wrote: | | TEBOWSANITYMANIA |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
shruj
Joined: 13 Nov 2010 Posts: 136 Location: Oswego, IL
|
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 12:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| MonserinNC wrote: | | Haha, what kind of question is ths? |
ditto. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DaMike
Joined: 21 Nov 2010 Posts: 3345
|
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 12:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| My polls don't seem to go over well here. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Madmike90 
Joined: 25 Jan 2009 Posts: 18563 Location: Scotland
|
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 1:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| CBears019 wrote: | | No. I'm not against drafting him, but I'm totally against spending essentially 60% of our draft on one guy. |
Agreed...can't give up that much for Te'o. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SOCalBearsFan54 
Joined: 13 Jan 2013 Posts: 278 Location: Los Angeles
|
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 1:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Seems like we would be giving up way too much for a well known player when there are other LBs who are more talented. I also don't wont the baggage and the circus that follows Te'o. _________________
Alright. Ditka vs. God in a golf match. Now, he's a good golfer. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DaMike
Joined: 21 Nov 2010 Posts: 3345
|
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 1:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| I think Mike Mayock said it best. The good teams at the end of the 1st hope for things like this. They hope for talented players like this for run bad 40s. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
GOGRIESE 
Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Posts: 14638 Location: Use to live in Chicago Now Im in Austin Texas
|
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 2:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| DaMike wrote: | | My polls don't seem to go over well here. |
Probably because they are really silly.
He doesnt fit in this scheme and is limited in his ability. Plus he has a circus that he carries(similar to the other thread isnt it?). So absolutely not. _________________
^^ props to Ty on the sig
War room link
http://www.footballsfuture.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=512157 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|