| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Blagasse67
Joined: 04 Feb 2009
Posts: 11183
Location: Delaware
|
 Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2013 8:09 pm Post subject: B67 Mock Offseason |
 |
|
|
So I figure I'd try to do a mock off season. I'll do another closer to the draft of a full 7 rounder
Franchise Tag:
Randy Starks
Resign:
Chris Clemons
Brian Hartline
Free Agency:
Michael Johnson
Derek Cox
Martellus Bennett
Draft:
1.) Lane Johnson
2.) Quinton Patton
2.) Ryan Swope
3.) Jordan Poyer
3.) Jordan Reed
4.) Barrett Jones
I was able to stay away from overpaying Mike Wallace and predicting that Greg Jennings gets tagged and stays with Green Bay. Saving that money I was able to sign Bennett, Cox, and Johnson. All of this while resigning Hartline and Clemons.
In the draft I focused on adding weapons for Ryan Tannehill in Swope, Patton, and Reed. Poyer gives us youth and a playmaker in the secondary.
Drafting Lane Johnson and Barrett Jones, gives us a replacement for Jake Long and one of our Gs.
Have it.
_________________
Kempes on the sig |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fishfan4life
Joined: 15 Mar 2012
Posts: 1126
Location: santa rosa california
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2013 8:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
 Lane johnson |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Blagasse67
Joined: 04 Feb 2009
Posts: 11183
Location: Delaware
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2013 8:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| fishfan4life wrote: | | Lane johnson |
The entire draft can suck but I got Lane Johnson! lol
_________________
Kempes on the sig |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cddolphin
Joined: 23 Mar 2009
Posts: 4800
Location: Gainesville, FL
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2013 8:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Different and I like it. Realistic apart from Jones in the 4th, IMO
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fishfan4life
Joined: 15 Mar 2012
Posts: 1126
Location: santa rosa california
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2013 8:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Blagasse67 wrote: | | fishfan4life wrote: | | Lane johnson |
The entire draft can suck but I got Lane Johnson! lol |
lol.. Getting cox and micheal johnson in free agency really allows you to get offensive in this draft and let all these guys grow together for years but yeah i love me some lane johnson |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jaytotha
Joined: 27 Jan 2008
Posts: 3285
Location: Spokane Valley, Wa
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2013 8:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Doesn't fill the need of getting weapons on Offense. The draft is good though
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Blagasse67
Joined: 04 Feb 2009
Posts: 11183
Location: Delaware
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2013 8:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| cddolphin wrote: | | Different and I like it. Realistic apart from Jones in the 4th, IMO |
Yeah. I had read a few places of the top interior OL and for some reason he keeps slipping. A few places said the problem is, he isn't a set position and it's hard to give him a high rating when he doesn't have a set home. While he may be the #3 C Gs are rated higher than him. I though maybe he could be one of the guys that fall.
_________________
Kempes on the sig |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cddolphin
Joined: 23 Mar 2009
Posts: 4800
Location: Gainesville, FL
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2013 8:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Blagasse67 wrote: | | cddolphin wrote: | | Different and I like it. Realistic apart from Jones in the 4th, IMO |
Yeah. I had read a few places of the top interior OL and for some reason he keeps slipping. A few places said the problem is, he isn't a set position and it's hard to give him a high rating when he doesn't have a set home. While he may be the #3 C Gs are rated higher than him. I though maybe he could be one of the guys that fall. |
I was nitpicking but I'd be pleased if we can take him in the 4th, at least from what I currently know about him.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Blagasse67
Joined: 04 Feb 2009
Posts: 11183
Location: Delaware
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2013 8:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| fishfan4life wrote: | | Blagasse67 wrote: | | fishfan4life wrote: | | Lane johnson |
The entire draft can suck but I got Lane Johnson! lol |
lol.. Getting cox and micheal johnson in free agency really allows you to get offensive in this draft and let all these guys grow together for years but yeah i love me some lane johnson |
That was pretty much my idea. Fill some voids here and get us some weapons for Tannehill to grow with.
| Quote: | | Doesn't fill the need of getting weapons on Offense. The draft is good though |
What do you mean?
Quinton Patton and Ryan Swope both are WRs with good speed and good route running abilities. They catch with their hands and fit perfect in the WCO.
Jordan Reed gives us a tweener/playmaker role. The guy can be like Casey is for Houston. Line up in the back field or split out wide. Bennett had a solid year for the Giants. My guess, his production would have been up if Eli didn't spread the ball so much. Bennett would give us a vertical threat at TE and still a young player.
On top of that, I gave Tannehill protection to get the ball to these playmakers. Our WR corp would look like this
WR: Hartline/Matthews
WR: Patton
WR: Bess/Swope
TE: Bennett/Reed/Clay
LT: Lane Johnson
LG: Barrett Jones
C: Mike Pouncey
RG: John Jerry
RT: Jonathan Martin
_________________
Kempes on the sig |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Blagasse67
Joined: 04 Feb 2009
Posts: 11183
Location: Delaware
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2013 8:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| cddolphin wrote: | | Blagasse67 wrote: | | cddolphin wrote: | | Different and I like it. Realistic apart from Jones in the 4th, IMO |
Yeah. I had read a few places of the top interior OL and for some reason he keeps slipping. A few places said the problem is, he isn't a set position and it's hard to give him a high rating when he doesn't have a set home. While he may be the #3 C Gs are rated higher than him. I though maybe he could be one of the guys that fall. |
I was nitpicking but I'd be pleased if we can take him in the 4th, at least from what I currently know about him. |
Don't mind the nitpick. I was just giving you my mind set. He may not make it to the 4th. The depth of OL, there will be a quality G left.
_________________
Kempes on the sig |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
PhinFan52
Joined: 01 Nov 2007
Posts: 4307
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2013 8:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| I've been ranting about Jones for awhile.. Love him.. LT..OG..C what more can ya ask for.. but I don't see him lasting til 4th rd... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jaytotha
Joined: 27 Jan 2008
Posts: 3285
Location: Spokane Valley, Wa
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2013 8:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Blagasse67 wrote: | | fishfan4life wrote: | | Blagasse67 wrote: | | fishfan4life wrote: | | Lane johnson |
The entire draft can suck but I got Lane Johnson! lol |
lol.. Getting cox and micheal johnson in free agency really allows you to get offensive in this draft and let all these guys grow together for years but yeah i love me some lane johnson |
That was pretty much my idea. Fill some voids here and get us some weapons for Tannehill to grow with.
| Quote: | | Doesn't fill the need of getting weapons on Offense. The draft is good though |
What do you mean?
Quinton Patton and Ryan Swope both are WRs with good speed and good route running abilities. They catch with their hands and fit perfect in the WCO.
Jordan Reed gives us a tweener/playmaker role. The guy can be like Casey is for Houston. Line up in the back field or split out wide. Bennett had a solid year for the Giants. My guess, his production would have been up if Eli didn't spread the ball so much. Bennett would give us a vertical threat at TE and still a young player.
On top of that, I gave Tannehill protection to get the ball to these playmakers. Our WR corp would look like this
WR: Hartline/Matthews
WR: Patton
WR: Bess/Swope
TE: Bennett/Reed/Clay
LT: Lane Johnson
LG: Barrett Jones
C: Mike Pouncey
RG: John Jerry
RT: Jonathan Martin |
Swope and Patton will need time to develop. I like the Reed pick cause I think he can ball. I just don't see any playmakers and see the same type of receivers we had this last year. Just one mans opinion. I love the draft though
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Blagasse67
Joined: 04 Feb 2009
Posts: 11183
Location: Delaware
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2013 8:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Jaytotha wrote: | | Blagasse67 wrote: | | fishfan4life wrote: | | Blagasse67 wrote: | | fishfan4life wrote: | | Lane johnson |
The entire draft can suck but I got Lane Johnson! lol |
lol.. Getting cox and micheal johnson in free agency really allows you to get offensive in this draft and let all these guys grow together for years but yeah i love me some lane johnson |
That was pretty much my idea. Fill some voids here and get us some weapons for Tannehill to grow with.
| Quote: | | Doesn't fill the need of getting weapons on Offense. The draft is good though |
What do you mean?
Quinton Patton and Ryan Swope both are WRs with good speed and good route running abilities. They catch with their hands and fit perfect in the WCO.
Jordan Reed gives us a tweener/playmaker role. The guy can be like Casey is for Houston. Line up in the back field or split out wide. Bennett had a solid year for the Giants. My guess, his production would have been up if Eli didn't spread the ball so much. Bennett would give us a vertical threat at TE and still a young player.
On top of that, I gave Tannehill protection to get the ball to these playmakers. Our WR corp would look like this
WR: Hartline/Matthews
WR: Patton
WR: Bess/Swope
TE: Bennett/Reed/Clay
LT: Lane Johnson
LG: Barrett Jones
C: Mike Pouncey
RG: John Jerry
RT: Jonathan Martin |
Swope and Patton will need time to develop. I like the Reed pick cause I think he can ball. I just don't see any playmakers and see the same type of receivers we had this last year. Just one mans opinion. I love the draft though |
Patton and Swope both ran faster than Hartline and Bess. Patton ran 4.46 and Swope ran a 4.34 they are just flat out faster than the WR we have. They also will have help from Hartline and Bennett to take pressure off of them.
_________________
Kempes on the sig |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Warpticon
Joined: 21 May 2010
Posts: 1055
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2013 9:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| I don't see Johnson leaving the Bengals if they want him. Cincinnatti has more money than anybody this offseason, and he's already a Bengal, and they went to the playoffs this past season. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
freak_of_nature
Joined: 15 Oct 2012
Posts: 163
Location: ATL
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2013 9:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I like the addition of Swope in the early 3rd round. Hopefully, he'll replace Bess when he's a FA after next season.
Patton is someone I see as very similar to Hartline. Reed seems very similar to Clay.
While Swope and Patton would make our group of WR's better, I see them as not much better, if at all, to Hartline. So, no, I don't think you added a legit playmaker to the offense.
I'll also be floored if Johnson leave Cinci. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
