Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

2013 NFL Combine + Pro Day info
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 16, 17, 18 ... 21, 22, 23  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> San Francisco 49ers
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
oldman9er


Joined: 24 Oct 2006
Posts: 39382
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 9:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

rudyZ wrote:
oldman9er wrote:
^ would not mind Washington or Lemonier, if there in the 3rd rd...


Shotgun!

You're driving, right?


does I needs to be sober? Shocked
_________________

___
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rudyZ


Joined: 12 Mar 2007
Posts: 12875
Location: Québec
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 9:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

oldman9er wrote:
rudyZ wrote:
oldman9er wrote:
^ would not mind Washington or Lemonier, if there in the 3rd rd...


Shotgun!

You're driving, right?


does I needs to be sober? Shocked



I won't tell... if you don't get caught.
_________________


RudyZ's Power Rankings Power Ranking

1) RudyZ's Power Rankings Power Ranking
2) y2's pie Power Rankings (3.1416 rules!)
3) N4L's Poster Power Rankings
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
big9erfan


Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 13282
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 9:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

oldman9er wrote:
Kikuchiyo wrote:
oldman9er wrote:
Really didn't like Ansah out in space changing directions... but that's just me.


I actually thought the opposite. I thought he looked like one of the smoother DL to LB converts doing the drills. Him and Jordan were definitely the most fluid looking imo.


Hmmm.... interesting. I thought his balance in his turns was poor... not fluid when changing directions. I did record this stuff... but you saying that will make sure I take another look.


I thought he was a bit stiff too. But if we're looking at him to beef up and play DE it won't matter quite as much. He won't be dropping back into pass coverage very often as a DE, and even then it would likely to be a short zone.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
big9erfan


Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 13282
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 9:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

oldman9er wrote:
rudyZ wrote:
oldman9er wrote:
^ would not mind Washington or Lemonier, if there in the 3rd rd...


Shotgun!

You're driving, right?


does I needs to be sober? Shocked


Man. We can't let oldie drive. He's had some other crashes around this time of year in the past. Laughing
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rudyZ


Joined: 12 Mar 2007
Posts: 12875
Location: Québec
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 9:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

big9erfan wrote:
oldman9er wrote:
rudyZ wrote:
oldman9er wrote:
^ would not mind Washington or Lemonier, if there in the 3rd rd...


Shotgun!

You're driving, right?


does I needs to be sober? Shocked


Man. We can't let oldie drive. He's had some other crashes around this time of year in the past. Laughing



I can't drive either. My Darrell Robertson bandwagon is still in flame, in a ditch nowhere near the NFL.
_________________


RudyZ's Power Rankings Power Ranking

1) RudyZ's Power Rankings Power Ranking
2) y2's pie Power Rankings (3.1416 rules!)
3) N4L's Poster Power Rankings
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
oldman9er


Joined: 24 Oct 2006
Posts: 39382
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

big9erfan wrote:
oldman9er wrote:
Kikuchiyo wrote:
oldman9er wrote:
Really didn't like Ansah out in space changing directions... but that's just me.


I actually thought the opposite. I thought he looked like one of the smoother DL to LB converts doing the drills. Him and Jordan were definitely the most fluid looking imo.


Hmmm.... interesting. I thought his balance in his turns was poor... not fluid when changing directions. I did record this stuff... but you saying that will make sure I take another look.


I thought he was a bit stiff too. But if we're looking at him to beef up and play DE it won't matter quite as much. He won't be dropping back into pass coverage very often as a DE, and even then it would likely to be a short zone.


Right. Yeah, not worried about his COD as a DE. I just don't like him in space as a rush LB. I do want him to get some thickness to his thighs and calves though, if we go that DE route.
_________________

___
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
oldman9er


Joined: 24 Oct 2006
Posts: 39382
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 10:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

wow... did not expect David Amerson to run a 4.38. Shocked

Johnthan Banks with a 4.59.. eh...
_________________

___
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NcFinest9erFan


Joined: 10 Jan 2013
Posts: 2647
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 10:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

oldman9er wrote:
wow... did not expect David Amerson to run a 4.38. Shocked

Johnthan Banks with a 4.59.. eh...


4.38...not expecting that one. Oldman, where do you see him playing in the pros? in a off man scheme or FS?
_________________
Quote:

culliver wrote:
14-2.

Losses @DEN @SEA

#1 seed

Superbowl
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
oldman9er


Joined: 24 Oct 2006
Posts: 39382
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 10:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

NcFinest9erFan wrote:
oldman9er wrote:
wow... did not expect David Amerson to run a 4.38. Shocked

Johnthan Banks with a 4.59.. eh...


4.38...not expecting that one. Oldman, where do you see him playing in the pros? in a off man scheme or FS?


I had him slated as more of a FS... hmmm... may have to go back and look at the film. Wink
_________________

___
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Forge


Joined: 19 Feb 2010
Posts: 6483
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 10:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

NcFinest9erFan wrote:
oldman9er wrote:
wow... did not expect David Amerson to run a 4.38. Shocked

Johnthan Banks with a 4.59.. eh...


4.38...not expecting that one. Oldman, where do you see him playing in the pros? in a off man scheme or FS?


4.38 is impressive, but I still don't think he can cover. Its like DHB in Oakland. A fast corner who can't cover (not fluid enough for man IMO) and can't tackle is about as useful as a WR with 4.3 speed but no hands. Just not a fan of amerson. Better suited for safety in the NFL I think (and that is a position I think he'd be draftable for us)
_________________


Two in harmony surpasses one in perfection - P3
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
oldman9er


Joined: 24 Oct 2006
Posts: 39382
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 10:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Forge wrote:
NcFinest9erFan wrote:
oldman9er wrote:
wow... did not expect David Amerson to run a 4.38. Shocked

Johnthan Banks with a 4.59.. eh...


4.38...not expecting that one. Oldman, where do you see him playing in the pros? in a off man scheme or FS?


4.38 is impressive, but I still don't think he can cover. Its like DHB in Oakland. A fast corner who can't cover (not fluid enough for man IMO) and can't tackle is about as useful as a WR with 4.3 speed but no hands. Just not a fan of amerson. Better suited for safety in the NFL I think (and that is a position I think he'd be draftable for us)


Yeah, it seems like a reaction time thing that will cause Amerson trouble... particularly as a CB. The conclusion for me is that sure, he has fast straight line speed... BUT... his mental processes do not trigger those muscles to move as quickly as they should. That, and his COD/plant and go is lacking... but we'll get a better look in the coming drills on that one.
_________________

___
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
oldman9er


Joined: 24 Oct 2006
Posts: 39382
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 11:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Pretty shameful and offensive coverage all weekend and on... They get so locked up on overrated prospects like Te'o and Mathieu that take much away from the rest.
_________________

___
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
oldman9er


Joined: 24 Oct 2006
Posts: 39382
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 12:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

NFL Combine 2013: Defensive Line and Linebacker Notes

http://www.ninersnation.com/2013/2/26/4029198/nfl-combine-2013-results-defensive-linemen-linebackers

Quote:
Sharrif Floyd, Florida: I have Floyd going third overall in the draft, and he did nothing to prove me wrong. He's very quick for his size at 297 lbs, and gets off the ball well. Former 49ers player Bryant Young coached Floyd at Florida and it appears he taught him how to play like a Niner. Floyd is going to be the first or second defensive tackle off the board.

_________________

___
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
oldman9er


Joined: 24 Oct 2006
Posts: 39382
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 12:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jordan Poyer with a 4.46... hoped for better, but not bad at all.

Eric Reid runs a 4.53.. that was the top end I expected.

Xavier Rhodes... a 4.41
_________________

___
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NcFinest9erFan


Joined: 10 Jan 2013
Posts: 2647
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 1:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Texas FS Kenny Vaccaro ran forty times of 4.59 and 4.63 at the NFL Scouting Combine.
They're not sensational times at first glance, but Vaccaro weighs 214 pounds and is very light on his feet even if his straight-line speed isn't sensational. In last year's West Virginia-Texas game, Vaccaro gave Tavon Austin all kinds of problems in the slot; Austin was only able to get open against Texas' other DBs. Vaccaro remains a strong candidate to be drafted in the top 25.

roto



Florida State CB Xavier Rhodes ran forty times of 4.41 and 4.41 at the NFL Scouting Combine.
Rhodes is a bit of a size-speed athletic freak at 6-foot-2, 210 with low 4.4 wheels. Although there has been some discussion of Rhodes moving to safety, he's more likely to be drafted as a cornerback in a press-man coverage scheme. Rhodes has shown playmaking ability on the ball and possesses physical traits to develop into a legit No. 1 NFL corner. He's a surefire top-20 overall pick.

roto
_________________
Quote:

culliver wrote:
14-2.

Losses @DEN @SEA

#1 seed

Superbowl
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> San Francisco 49ers All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 16, 17, 18 ... 21, 22, 23  Next
Page 17 of 23

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group