Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

Charles Woodson
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> St. Louis Rams
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Ryback


Joined: 04 Feb 2013
Posts: 85
Location: Memphis, TN
PostPosted: Fri Feb 15, 2013 9:11 pm    Post subject: Charles Woodson Reply with quote

Charles Woodson released by Green Bay Packers, today?
What a shocking move.
Do you see us interviewing Charles at all?
The man is a football player.
Would he be a good sign, good fit in our system?
Could he make a big impact on our team?
Is he worth the pick up?
Though I would post this.
I wouldn't mind giving the man a try for a year or two, too help out with what we have now.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
S-jax39


Joined: 23 Aug 2010
Posts: 6474
Location: [D]MV
PostPosted: Fri Feb 15, 2013 9:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

He's not good anymore.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kgarrett12486


Joined: 22 Jan 2007
Posts: 9418
Location: Busch III
PostPosted: Fri Feb 15, 2013 9:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It wasn't shocking at all, he was expected to be cut. His salary cap number for next year was way too high for his value...

We won't be pursuing him at all, as his play is steadily declining and he can't stay on the field over the recent. His agent has also stated that he only wants to play for an immediate Super Bowl contender (Denver, New England were the two rumored places)...
_________________

TommyC376 on the sig...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DEE RAWL


Joined: 02 Oct 2007
Posts: 4484
Location: Southern California
PostPosted: Fri Feb 15, 2013 10:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

S-jax39 wrote:
He's not good anymore.


I beg to differ. IMO he would still be an upgrade over Dahl.

For the right price I would love to bring him aboard.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
kmklink


Joined: 20 Feb 2006
Posts: 403
PostPosted: Sat Feb 16, 2013 9:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

2 year deal at 4million with a 1 million bonus for making the pro-bowl, but only if we cannot get a starting calliber safety in the draft to go with our young nucleus in the d-backfield. at his age , still better than Dahl !
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ramsfan4lyfe8


Joined: 03 Jun 2011
Posts: 165
Location: Emmaus PA
PostPosted: Sat Feb 16, 2013 10:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

DEE RAWL wrote:
S-jax39 wrote:
He's not good anymore.


I beg to differ. IMO he would still be an upgrade over Dahl.

For the right price I would love to bring him aboard.


Let's be totally honest here most of the posters on here along with my mail man would be an upgrade over Dahl. I agree that if we could get him for the right price that would be great but realistically you don't think Denver would offer more money and for the chance at another SB ring right away? I love the Rams to death but Charles is a competitor and wants to go to a true contender. Why would he be mulling the decision to either take the same amount of money (if not more) offered by Denver/New England, or sign in the Lou? Pretty easy choice IMO.


Not trying to bash the author of the post but I HATE it when a high profile player gets cut cause immediatley it's "should we sign x player" or "how does x player fit in our scheme" only downfall to FA in my opinion.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
DEE RAWL


Joined: 02 Oct 2007
Posts: 4484
Location: Southern California
PostPosted: Sat Feb 16, 2013 3:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I dont believe anyone is jumping the gun here, simply discussing the possibilites.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
The J.R.S.


Joined: 15 Feb 2007
Posts: 3715
Location: Next to Waldo
PostPosted: Sat Feb 16, 2013 4:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm not interested in Woodson. Sorry, but he would only be depth at this stage of his career.
_________________


Real sports fans do not condone ESPN.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DEE RAWL


Joined: 02 Oct 2007
Posts: 4484
Location: Southern California
PostPosted: Sat Feb 16, 2013 4:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The J.R.S. wrote:
I'm not interested in Woodson. Sorry, but he would only be depth at this stage of his career.


Alot of players would be, but Woodson is different. One of the few that can still play at a high level.

Example: Aeneas Williams
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
NVRamsFan


Joined: 22 Mar 2009
Posts: 2428
Location: Reno, NV
PostPosted: Sat Feb 16, 2013 5:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Not only can he still be productive but him and Cort as an influence on our young guys in the secondary could be a huge benefit.
_________________

Sig courtesy of SJax39

Adopt a Ram
Sam Bradford
159-262 1687 yards 14 TD 4 INT
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ryback


Joined: 04 Feb 2013
Posts: 85
Location: Memphis, TN
PostPosted: Sat Feb 16, 2013 6:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

NVRamsFan wrote:
Not only can he still be productive but him and Cort as an influence on our young guys in the secondary could be a huge benefit.


Thank You someone who agrees Instead of the new guy getting bashed.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
The J.R.S.


Joined: 15 Feb 2007
Posts: 3715
Location: Next to Waldo
PostPosted: Sat Feb 16, 2013 8:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ryback wrote:
NVRamsFan wrote:
Not only can he still be productive but him and Cort as an influence on our young guys in the secondary could be a huge benefit.


Thank You someone who agrees Instead of the new guy getting bashed.


We have a guy like that-Finnegan.

Woodson was already moved to safety due to his declining skills. I'm not completely opposed to giving him a look, but I don't want to see him starting next year.
_________________


Real sports fans do not condone ESPN.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Flatlyner


Joined: 06 Feb 2006
Posts: 5960
Location: WESTCOAST
PostPosted: Sat Feb 16, 2013 8:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I do not want him if it will diminish the importance of drafting of a safety this year. Its been a long time since we have addressed safety via the draft and we are long overdue having a young impact safety. Woodson has a year, possibly 2 left. We need someone here for the long run to grow with our young team. Not to mention, thats money better spent elsewhere, money which we don't have a huge amount of.
_________________
WELCOME TO THE RAMS:
Greg Robinson
Aaron Donald
Lamarcus Joyner
Tre Mason
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kgarrett12486


Joined: 22 Jan 2007
Posts: 9418
Location: Busch III
PostPosted: Sun Feb 17, 2013 12:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

People are missing the point here, he's pretty much come out and said through his agent that he only wants to play for an immediate Super Bowl contender...

The Rams aren't gonna be in that category to him, no matter what any of us believe...
_________________

TommyC376 on the sig...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
yrba1


Joined: 25 Jan 2011
Posts: 1299
PostPosted: Sun Feb 17, 2013 1:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

He would've been a great pickup.

Five years ago.
_________________
♪ R.I.P. Nujabes ♫
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> St. Louis Rams All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group