| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
The J.R.S.
Joined: 15 Feb 2007
Posts: 2772
Location: Next to Waldo
|
 Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 1:38 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
I'm on record as saying that #16 is too high for Austin, and I still feel that way. However, I think he is a perfect fit for this team, and he may not make it past #21. This format and thought process is still a work in progress so thanks for the input.
I would love it if people would post mocks that are formatted similarly to this one. It provokes deeper thought when you include options that were or were not available.
_________________
Real sports fans do not condone ESPN. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jjab360
Joined: 31 Dec 2008
Posts: 3366
Location: On Top
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 1:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| The J.R.S. wrote: | | I would love it if people would post mocks that are formatted similarly to this one. It provokes deeper thought when you include options that were or were not available. |
Good idea.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Flatlyner
Joined: 06 Feb 2006
Posts: 4510
Location: WESTCOAST
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 5:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| The J.R.S. wrote: | I'm on record as saying that #16 is too high for Austin, and I still feel that way. However, I think he is a perfect fit for this team, and he may not make it past #21. This format and thought process is still a work in progress so thanks for the input.
I would love it if people would post mocks that are formatted similarly to this one. It provokes deeper thought when you include options that were or were not available. |
Agreed and I mentioned in my post how I appreciated the format. It give us all more input regarding the decision for the particular choice.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TDerick94
Joined: 05 Dec 2012
Posts: 42
Location: My chair
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 7:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| I don't like Eifert at #22,also I would prefer Lane Johnson at #16. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
The J.R.S.
Joined: 15 Feb 2007
Posts: 2772
Location: Next to Waldo
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 8:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Flatlyner wrote: | | The J.R.S. wrote: | I'm on record as saying that #16 is too high for Austin, and I still feel that way. However, I think he is a perfect fit for this team, and he may not make it past #21. This format and thought process is still a work in progress so thanks for the input.
I would love it if people would post mocks that are formatted similarly to this one. It provokes deeper thought when you include options that were or were not available. |
Agreed and I mentioned in my post how I appreciated the format. It give us all more input regarding the decision for the particular choice. |
Thanks. And to address your earlier remark about not wanting to pass on Ansah......
He was originally my pick at #22, and Sheldon Richardson was the pick at #16.
I backed off both eventually, Ansah because I don't think he will be taken in the first round, and Richardson because I wanted to reflect my belief that we will target offensive weapons early.
_________________
Real sports fans do not condone ESPN. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Flatlyner
Joined: 06 Feb 2006
Posts: 4510
Location: WESTCOAST
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 11:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| The J.R.S. wrote: | | Flatlyner wrote: | | The J.R.S. wrote: | I'm on record as saying that #16 is too high for Austin, and I still feel that way. However, I think he is a perfect fit for this team, and he may not make it past #21. This format and thought process is still a work in progress so thanks for the input.
I would love it if people would post mocks that are formatted similarly to this one. It provokes deeper thought when you include options that were or were not available. |
Agreed and I mentioned in my post how I appreciated the format. It give us all more input regarding the decision for the particular choice. |
Thanks. And to address your earlier remark about not wanting to pass on Ansah......
He was originally my pick at #22, and Sheldon Richardson was the pick at #16.
I backed off both eventually, Ansah because I don't think he will be taken in the first round, and Richardson because I wanted to reflect my belief that we will target offensive weapons early. |
So, he was originally your pick at #22, yet, he is available at #46 and we pass on him? For Eifert?
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
The J.R.S.
Joined: 15 Feb 2007
Posts: 2772
Location: Next to Waldo
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2013 1:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Flatlyner wrote: | | The J.R.S. wrote: | | Flatlyner wrote: | | The J.R.S. wrote: | I'm on record as saying that #16 is too high for Austin, and I still feel that way. However, I think he is a perfect fit for this team, and he may not make it past #21. This format and thought process is still a work in progress so thanks for the input.
I would love it if people would post mocks that are formatted similarly to this one. It provokes deeper thought when you include options that were or were not available. |
Agreed and I mentioned in my post how I appreciated the format. It give us all more input regarding the decision for the particular choice. |
Thanks. And to address your earlier remark about not wanting to pass on Ansah......
He was originally my pick at #22, and Sheldon Richardson was the pick at #16.
I backed off both eventually, Ansah because I don't think he will be taken in the first round, and Richardson because I wanted to reflect my belief that we will target offensive weapons early. |
So, he was originally your pick at #22, yet, he is available at #46 and we pass on him? For Eifert? |
We passed on him at #22 for Eiffert, but at #46 it was for Warford.
I like Ansah, but he has played very little football. I haven't seen all that much of his play either. Have you?
_________________
Real sports fans do not condone ESPN. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Flatlyner
Joined: 06 Feb 2006
Posts: 4510
Location: WESTCOAST
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2013 3:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Can't claim to have seen a lot of tape on him, but, that which I've been able to, coupled with his performance at Senior Bowl, has definitely peaked my interest. His value is tremendous at #46, if, by some chance he were to slip that low, which I personally doubt seriously.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RamsFan24
Joined: 20 Mar 2009
Posts: 414
Location: St. Louis
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2013 3:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
This is surely a different mock man, I really like how you took the time to set this up, I wouldn't be mad with these picks, different, but exciting, good job.
_________________
DIE HARD RAMS FAN FOR LIFE
Code:
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
