| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
swindlemaster
Joined: 24 Jan 2010
Posts: 83
|
 Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 10:04 pm Post subject: Milliner |
 |
|
|
| Alot of teams ahead of the Dolphins could take Milliner-CB.( TEN. S.D.CLEV.)Do you think the Dolphins would trade one of their second round picks to move up to maybe six to take him? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Emerica
Joined: 12 Nov 2011
Posts: 1061
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 10:07 pm Post subject: Re: Milliner |
|
|
|
| swindlemaster wrote: | | Alot of teams ahead of the Dolphins could take Milliner-CB.( TEN. S.D.CLEV.)Do you think the Dolphins would trade one of their second round picks to move up to maybe six to take him? |
No.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
skatewood2
Joined: 10 Feb 2007
Posts: 5543
Location: Kent, WA
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 10:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I don't really see a need to move up IMO. We still have a lot of needs and to move up will only take away from that. Not only that, but we will have a lot of good players fall to us at #12 and there are always surprise players falling that could work out for us. I don't like the idea of moving up but would be interested in moving back.
_________________
NFL - Miami Dolphins
College - THE Ohio State University Buckeyes |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dolphinemidget
Joined: 03 Jan 2008
Posts: 3241
Location: Florida
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 10:34 pm Post subject: Re: Milliner |
|
|
|
| Emerica wrote: | | swindlemaster wrote: | | Alot of teams ahead of the Dolphins could take Milliner-CB.( TEN. S.D.CLEV.)Do you think the Dolphins would trade one of their second round picks to move up to maybe six to take him? |
No. |
FACT
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jaytotha
Joined: 27 Jan 2008
Posts: 3286
Location: Spokane Valley, Wa
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 10:59 pm Post subject: Re: Milliner |
|
|
|
| Dolphinemidget wrote: | | Emerica wrote: | | swindlemaster wrote: | | Alot of teams ahead of the Dolphins could take Milliner-CB.( TEN. S.D.CLEV.)Do you think the Dolphins would trade one of their second round picks to move up to maybe six to take him? |
No. |
FACT |
I agree plus I like Banks better.
Fact is with so many holes there is going to be players falling that can still make an impact next year. Whether its WR, CB, or DE shoot even OL I think we will be good at 12.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dolphinemidget
Joined: 03 Jan 2008
Posts: 3241
Location: Florida
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 11:06 pm Post subject: Re: Milliner |
|
|
|
| Jaytotha wrote: | | Dolphinemidget wrote: | | Emerica wrote: | | swindlemaster wrote: | | Alot of teams ahead of the Dolphins could take Milliner-CB.( TEN. S.D.CLEV.)Do you think the Dolphins would trade one of their second round picks to move up to maybe six to take him? |
No. |
FACT |
I agree plus I like Banks better.
Fact is with so many holes there is going to be players falling that can still make an impact next year. Whether its WR, CB, or DE shoot even OL I think we will be good at 12. |
Yea if Millner is gone and we are going CB Banks should be there at 12 unless someone jumps us for him.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ViolentMonk71
Joined: 06 May 2005
Posts: 2521
Location: Don Shula's front porch
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2013 8:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Too many holes and too many options to trade away 50 pick to move up for one player. If it was a QB then I can understand, but being set at that position I would give a resounding no. DE, OT, S, WR, OG, CB.....lots can be address and the Phins would be better served keeping picks.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Maddogg
Joined: 29 Mar 2007
Posts: 1122
Location: A Galaxy Far Far Away......
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2013 4:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I don't see the Dolphins moving up in round one. Based on my rankings the talent is on defense and the offensive line in round one. The smart move for the Dolphins is stay at 12 or possibly move down a few slots to pick up additional picks.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fishfan4life
Joined: 15 Mar 2012
Posts: 1127
Location: santa rosa california
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2013 5:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| I would rather take Vaccaro over banks all day. BPA over need. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Phinsfan93
Joined: 02 Jan 2013
Posts: 73
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2013 11:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Don't have to. I think people will be surprised how deep this CB class is. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Miami2DaMax
Joined: 24 Mar 2010
Posts: 775
Location: North Carolina
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2013 10:33 am Post subject: Re: Milliner |
|
|
|
| Jaytotha wrote: | | Dolphinemidget wrote: | | Emerica wrote: | | swindlemaster wrote: | | Alot of teams ahead of the Dolphins could take Milliner-CB.( TEN. S.D.CLEV.)Do you think the Dolphins would trade one of their second round picks to move up to maybe six to take him? |
No. |
FACT |
I agree plus I like Banks better.
Fact is with so many holes there is going to be players falling that can still make an impact next year. Whether its WR, CB, or DE shoot even OL I think we will be good at 12. |
Yeah, I think Banks's better too. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Blagasse67
Joined: 04 Feb 2009
Posts: 11183
Location: Delaware
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2013 11:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
No thanks. We can get Jordan Poyer in the 2nd. We can get Ansah or Jordan in the first to help with pass rush.
_________________
Kempes on the sig |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SUG
Joined: 15 May 2007
Posts: 6455
Location: Alameda, Ca
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2013 12:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
No & for so many reasons.
1. when your 7-9 trying to develope a 2nd yr QB you dont move up to draft a CB that high.
2. when your in the lower half of TD scoring Off in the NFL you dont draft a CB that high.
3. when half the Off starters do not fit the West Coast scheme you dont draft a CB that high.
4. when you only have 1 elite pass rusher halfway through his career you dont draft a CB that high.
My 2 cents
sug
_________________
 # 52 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Blagasse67
Joined: 04 Feb 2009
Posts: 11183
Location: Delaware
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2013 1:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| SUG wrote: | No & for so many reasons.
1. when your 7-9 trying to develope a 2nd yr QB you dont move up to draft a CB that high.
2. when your in the lower half of TD scoring Off in the NFL you dont draft a CB that high.
3. when half the Off starters do not fit the West Coast scheme you dont draft a CB that high.
4. when you only have 1 elite pass rusher halfway through his career you dont draft a CB that high.
My 2 cents
sug |
I agree with everything but 2. I think just because you don't have offensive scoring doesn't mean you have to reach for a WR. i think you can get a WR in the 2nd in Patton. There are more WRs in the 2nd and 3rd round this year. I do agree that pass rush is a need but Banks could be one of the best players available at 12. No need to trade up at all. We can sit tight and have Banks at 12
_________________
Kempes on the sig |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SUG
Joined: 15 May 2007
Posts: 6455
Location: Alameda, Ca
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2013 1:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Blagasse67 wrote: | | SUG wrote: | No & for so many reasons.
1. when your 7-9 trying to develope a 2nd yr QB you dont move up to draft a CB that high.
2. when your in the lower half of TD scoring Off in the NFL you dont draft a CB that high.
3. when half the Off starters do not fit the West Coast scheme you dont draft a CB that high.
4. when you only have 1 elite pass rusher halfway through his career you dont draft a CB that high.
My 2 cents
sug |
I agree with everything but 2. I think just because you don't have offensive scoring doesn't mean you have to reach for a WR. i think you can get a WR in the 2nd in Patton. There are more WRs in the 2nd and 3rd round this year. I do agree that pass rush is a need but Banks could be one of the best players available at 12. No need to trade up at all. We can sit tight and have Banks at 12 |
Howdy B67
So we agree on the whole "not moving up" for a CB but ... no way do I put a drafting a WR before a stud TE.
If Philbin felt one of the TEs was well worth #12 or pk # 2A I'd be thrilled.
To me the an Elite TE has more value than a WR in the WC Off just from the perspective of
math alone. (3 WR to 1 TE)
What we need in the RZ is vertical dominance to help compliment the speed of Bess & Hartline.
We are not going to land all the long term solutions at WR this yr & we have neglected drafting a
STUD TE since the days of #13.
sug
_________________
# 52
Last edited by SUG on Tue Feb 12, 2013 1:20 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
