| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
nfldraftguru1
Joined: 07 Feb 2009
Posts: 11119
Location: Menomonie, WI
|
 Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2013 10:56 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| PossibleCabbage wrote: | | nfldraftguru1 wrote: | | Canty's value is much higher than that. That's just an unrealistic scenario. I'd give Canty a few million per for 2 years and if he gets a better offer elsewhere so be it, but I'd undoubtedly give him more than Muir or Merling got. |
If you're going to give Canty a "can't cut you at the end of camp" type contract, you have to be comfortable cutting one of the following: Raji, Pickett, Wilson, Neal, Worthy, Daniels. You probably have to also be comfortable in not spending a medium-high pick on a DL.
I just can't see either of those things happening.
If you get Canty on a "we can just cut you whenever, no sweat" deal, then go for it. But otherwise, you let him sign elsewhere (since his value is more than the vet min, but that's a better deal for some other team than for us.) |
If we got Canty I'd be fine cutting Wilson or Daniels, probably Daniels.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
incognito_man
Joined: 11 Jan 2007
Posts: 38161
Location: Madison
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2013 11:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| nfldraftguru1 wrote: | | PossibleCabbage wrote: | | nfldraftguru1 wrote: | | Canty's value is much higher than that. That's just an unrealistic scenario. I'd give Canty a few million per for 2 years and if he gets a better offer elsewhere so be it, but I'd undoubtedly give him more than Muir or Merling got. |
If you're going to give Canty a "can't cut you at the end of camp" type contract, you have to be comfortable cutting one of the following: Raji, Pickett, Wilson, Neal, Worthy, Daniels. You probably have to also be comfortable in not spending a medium-high pick on a DL.
I just can't see either of those things happening.
If you get Canty on a "we can just cut you whenever, no sweat" deal, then go for it. But otherwise, you let him sign elsewhere (since his value is more than the vet min, but that's a better deal for some other team than for us.) |
If we got Canty I'd be fine cutting Wilson or Daniels, probably Daniels. |
wow... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
palmy50
Joined: 26 Nov 2006
Posts: 15353
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2013 11:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| nfldraftguru1 wrote: | | PossibleCabbage wrote: | | nfldraftguru1 wrote: | | Canty's value is much higher than that. That's just an unrealistic scenario. I'd give Canty a few million per for 2 years and if he gets a better offer elsewhere so be it, but I'd undoubtedly give him more than Muir or Merling got. |
If you're going to give Canty a "can't cut you at the end of camp" type contract, you have to be comfortable cutting one of the following: Raji, Pickett, Wilson, Neal, Worthy, Daniels. You probably have to also be comfortable in not spending a medium-high pick on a DL.
I just can't see either of those things happening.
If you get Canty on a "we can just cut you whenever, no sweat" deal, then go for it. But otherwise, you let him sign elsewhere (since his value is more than the vet min, but that's a better deal for some other team than for us.) |
If we got Canty I'd be fine cutting Wilson or Daniels, probably Daniels. |
Wait, what?
I agree with you more times than not, guru. Please explain! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nfldraftguru1
Joined: 07 Feb 2009
Posts: 11119
Location: Menomonie, WI
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2013 11:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| incognito_man wrote: | | nfldraftguru1 wrote: | | PossibleCabbage wrote: | | nfldraftguru1 wrote: | | Canty's value is much higher than that. That's just an unrealistic scenario. I'd give Canty a few million per for 2 years and if he gets a better offer elsewhere so be it, but I'd undoubtedly give him more than Muir or Merling got. |
If you're going to give Canty a "can't cut you at the end of camp" type contract, you have to be comfortable cutting one of the following: Raji, Pickett, Wilson, Neal, Worthy, Daniels. You probably have to also be comfortable in not spending a medium-high pick on a DL.
I just can't see either of those things happening.
If you get Canty on a "we can just cut you whenever, no sweat" deal, then go for it. But otherwise, you let him sign elsewhere (since his value is more than the vet min, but that's a better deal for some other team than for us.) |
If we got Canty I'd be fine cutting Wilson or Daniels, probably Daniels. |
wow... |
Daniels ceiling is a nickel rusher, Canty can be a legitimate everydown RE. Sure, probably wouldn't be smart to cut Wilson, but Daniels is nothing special.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
palmy50
Joined: 26 Nov 2006
Posts: 15353
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2013 11:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| nfldraftguru1 wrote: | | incognito_man wrote: | | nfldraftguru1 wrote: | | PossibleCabbage wrote: | | nfldraftguru1 wrote: | | Canty's value is much higher than that. That's just an unrealistic scenario. I'd give Canty a few million per for 2 years and if he gets a better offer elsewhere so be it, but I'd undoubtedly give him more than Muir or Merling got. |
If you're going to give Canty a "can't cut you at the end of camp" type contract, you have to be comfortable cutting one of the following: Raji, Pickett, Wilson, Neal, Worthy, Daniels. You probably have to also be comfortable in not spending a medium-high pick on a DL.
I just can't see either of those things happening.
If you get Canty on a "we can just cut you whenever, no sweat" deal, then go for it. But otherwise, you let him sign elsewhere (since his value is more than the vet min, but that's a better deal for some other team than for us.) |
If we got Canty I'd be fine cutting Wilson or Daniels, probably Daniels. |
wow... |
Daniels ceiling is a nickel rusher, Canty can be a legitimate everydown RE. Sure, probably wouldn't be smart to cut Wilson, but Daniels is nothing special. |
I hope one understands how little Capers plays base. In that, there is a premium on Daniels. Even more so on this Packers roster with the lack of pass rushers up front. One could make a very strong case for Daniels being number two on that list after Neal and with Neal's injury history...........
Just sayin. If they landed Canty I would be more willing to let Wilson walk than Daniels, not that I would do that either. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nfldraftguru1
Joined: 07 Feb 2009
Posts: 11119
Location: Menomonie, WI
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2013 11:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| palmy50 wrote: | | nfldraftguru1 wrote: | | incognito_man wrote: | | nfldraftguru1 wrote: | | PossibleCabbage wrote: | | nfldraftguru1 wrote: | | Canty's value is much higher than that. That's just an unrealistic scenario. I'd give Canty a few million per for 2 years and if he gets a better offer elsewhere so be it, but I'd undoubtedly give him more than Muir or Merling got. |
If you're going to give Canty a "can't cut you at the end of camp" type contract, you have to be comfortable cutting one of the following: Raji, Pickett, Wilson, Neal, Worthy, Daniels. You probably have to also be comfortable in not spending a medium-high pick on a DL.
I just can't see either of those things happening.
If you get Canty on a "we can just cut you whenever, no sweat" deal, then go for it. But otherwise, you let him sign elsewhere (since his value is more than the vet min, but that's a better deal for some other team than for us.) |
If we got Canty I'd be fine cutting Wilson or Daniels, probably Daniels. |
wow... |
Daniels ceiling is a nickel rusher, Canty can be a legitimate everydown RE. Sure, probably wouldn't be smart to cut Wilson, but Daniels is nothing special. |
I hope one understands how little Capers plays base. In that, there is a premium on Daniels. Even more so on this Packers roster with the lack of pass rushers up front. One could make a very strong case for Daniels being number two on that list after Neal and with Neal's injury history........... |
Hasn't Canty been a decent enough pass rusher to at least be a reserve in that department? I mean ideally in the nickel you're going with some combo of Neal-Worthy-Raji up front. Add in Canty as the 4th nickel DL and have him in on 1st down even in the nickel to stop the run better and all of the sudden you've got solid depth up front in nickel as well as a stronger base unit.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JBURGE25
Joined: 25 Jan 2012
Posts: 16930
Location: Canadia
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2013 11:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| nfldraftguru1 wrote: | | incognito_man wrote: | | nfldraftguru1 wrote: | | PossibleCabbage wrote: | | nfldraftguru1 wrote: | | Canty's value is much higher than that. That's just an unrealistic scenario. I'd give Canty a few million per for 2 years and if he gets a better offer elsewhere so be it, but I'd undoubtedly give him more than Muir or Merling got. |
If you're going to give Canty a "can't cut you at the end of camp" type contract, you have to be comfortable cutting one of the following: Raji, Pickett, Wilson, Neal, Worthy, Daniels. You probably have to also be comfortable in not spending a medium-high pick on a DL.
I just can't see either of those things happening.
If you get Canty on a "we can just cut you whenever, no sweat" deal, then go for it. But otherwise, you let him sign elsewhere (since his value is more than the vet min, but that's a better deal for some other team than for us.) |
If we got Canty I'd be fine cutting Wilson or Daniels, probably Daniels. |
wow... |
Daniels ceiling is a nickel rusher, Canty can be a legitimate everydown RE. Sure, probably wouldn't be smart to cut Wilson, but Daniels is nothing special. |
I would rather keep both and not grab Canty. That's just me though 
_________________
FF Big Brother III Winner  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ajhawk5047
Joined: 04 Jan 2007
Posts: 1653
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2013 11:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| JBURGE25 wrote: | | nfldraftguru1 wrote: | | incognito_man wrote: | | nfldraftguru1 wrote: | | PossibleCabbage wrote: | | nfldraftguru1 wrote: | | Canty's value is much higher than that. That's just an unrealistic scenario. I'd give Canty a few million per for 2 years and if he gets a better offer elsewhere so be it, but I'd undoubtedly give him more than Muir or Merling got. |
If you're going to give Canty a "can't cut you at the end of camp" type contract, you have to be comfortable cutting one of the following: Raji, Pickett, Wilson, Neal, Worthy, Daniels. You probably have to also be comfortable in not spending a medium-high pick on a DL.
I just can't see either of those things happening.
If you get Canty on a "we can just cut you whenever, no sweat" deal, then go for it. But otherwise, you let him sign elsewhere (since his value is more than the vet min, but that's a better deal for some other team than for us.) |
If we got Canty I'd be fine cutting Wilson or Daniels, probably Daniels. |
wow... |
Daniels ceiling is a nickel rusher, Canty can be a legitimate everydown RE. Sure, probably wouldn't be smart to cut Wilson, but Daniels is nothing special. |
I would rather keep both and not grab Canty. That's just me though |
how about we sign canty and keep wilson and daniels and get rid of one of our 5 tight ends...
_________________
Go Packers! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nfldraftguru1
Joined: 07 Feb 2009
Posts: 11119
Location: Menomonie, WI
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2013 11:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| ajhawk5047 wrote: | | JBURGE25 wrote: | | nfldraftguru1 wrote: | | incognito_man wrote: | | nfldraftguru1 wrote: | | PossibleCabbage wrote: | | nfldraftguru1 wrote: | | Canty's value is much higher than that. That's just an unrealistic scenario. I'd give Canty a few million per for 2 years and if he gets a better offer elsewhere so be it, but I'd undoubtedly give him more than Muir or Merling got. |
If you're going to give Canty a "can't cut you at the end of camp" type contract, you have to be comfortable cutting one of the following: Raji, Pickett, Wilson, Neal, Worthy, Daniels. You probably have to also be comfortable in not spending a medium-high pick on a DL.
I just can't see either of those things happening.
If you get Canty on a "we can just cut you whenever, no sweat" deal, then go for it. But otherwise, you let him sign elsewhere (since his value is more than the vet min, but that's a better deal for some other team than for us.) |
If we got Canty I'd be fine cutting Wilson or Daniels, probably Daniels. |
wow... |
Daniels ceiling is a nickel rusher, Canty can be a legitimate everydown RE. Sure, probably wouldn't be smart to cut Wilson, but Daniels is nothing special. |
I would rather keep both and not grab Canty. That's just me though |
how about we sign canty and keep wilson and daniels and get rid of one of our 5 tight ends... |
That would upset justo. 
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
PossibleCabbage
Joined: 25 Apr 2011
Posts: 4290
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2013 3:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
If signing Canty means letting go of Wilson, I'm not on board. It's not worth it to spend a bunch of money to slightly upgrade a position that isn't used very much.
Keeping 7 DL isn't ideal, since those guys don't contribute on special teams, and there's usually only about 2.25 of them on the field when on defense anyway, and usually only 5 DL active on the game day roster, whereas the 18,000,000 linebackers, TEs, and FBs are your core special teamers.
If we're going to replace a DL with a better DL, do it in the draft where the guy you get will be younger and cheaper. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mr Green
Joined: 15 Feb 2009
Posts: 1544
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2013 6:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Wilson may be a good run defender but at the end of the day he's just a guy. Easily replaceable imo. Neal, Daniels and Worthy all have much higher ceilings.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
incognito_man
Joined: 11 Jan 2007
Posts: 38161
Location: Madison
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2013 1:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| nfldraftguru1 wrote: |
Daniels ceiling is a nickel rusher, Canty can be a legitimate everydown RE. Sure, probably wouldn't be smart to cut Wilson, but Daniels is nothing special. |
I just thought it was crazy you'd want to keep Wilson over Daniels. I think Canty would be a far better replacement for Wilson than he would be for Daniels.
If Canty is dirt cheap compared to what he was, I think he *could* be a nice addition, but I wouldn't cut Daniels to pay Canty more than Daniels will get over the next 3 years. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nfldraftguru1
Joined: 07 Feb 2009
Posts: 11119
Location: Menomonie, WI
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2013 2:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| incognito_man wrote: | | nfldraftguru1 wrote: |
Daniels ceiling is a nickel rusher, Canty can be a legitimate everydown RE. Sure, probably wouldn't be smart to cut Wilson, but Daniels is nothing special. |
I just thought it was crazy you'd want to keep Wilson over Daniels. I think Canty would be a far better replacement for Wilson than he would be for Daniels.
If Canty is dirt cheap compared to what he was, I think he *could* be a nice addition, but I wouldn't cut Daniels to pay Canty more than Daniels will get over the next 3 years. |
It's very market dependent and quite likely he prices out of our range.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
