| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Which player would you pick with the #16 pick |
| Jarvis Jones |
|
25% |
[ 9 ] |
| Kenny Vaccaro |
|
8% |
[ 3 ] |
| Chance Warmack |
|
63% |
[ 23 ] |
| Cordarrelle Patterson |
|
2% |
[ 1 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 36 |
|
| Author |
Message |
Loomis50
Joined: 21 Jan 2013
Posts: 12
|
 Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2013 6:39 pm Post subject: Pick #16 |
 |
|
|
If these 4 players available which one would you select with the #16 pick. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
I <3 Faulk
Joined: 01 May 2008
Posts: 1598
Location: straight out of Compton.
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2013 6:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Probably Chance. Jones would be very tempting though.
_________________
| adam9 wrote: |
One of the best posts I've ever read... |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jonezy
Joined: 14 Dec 2009
Posts: 2992
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2013 6:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
You should change the title to "Who would you take at 16 if Chance is gone?" He is a no brainier at 16
_________________
^Delphi83^ (Sig)
<El Ramster.< (Avatar)
| norcalraider510 wrote: |
Rams front 4 is going to be amazing next year |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
STLRamsFan99
Joined: 17 Aug 2012
Posts: 863
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2013 11:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Jonezy wrote: | | You should change the title to "Who would you take at 16 if Chance is gone?" He is a no brainier at 16 |
I disagree, Jones at 16 is the easy pick for me. At this point no way he slips unless for some reason the medical evaluations at the combine.
Playmaking LB prospect > guard propsect in my opinion.
Johnson and other options could be available with our second 1st round pick. Plus guys like Warford will be around in the 2nd round. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jonezy
Joined: 14 Dec 2009
Posts: 2992
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2013 12:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| STLRamsFan99 wrote: | | Jonezy wrote: | | You should change the title to "Who would you take at 16 if Chance is gone?" He is a no brainier at 16 |
I disagree, Jones at 16 is the easy pick for me. At this point no way he slips unless for some reason the medical evaluations at the combine.
Playmaking LB prospect > guard propsect in my opinion.
Johnson and other options could be available with our second 1st round pick. Plus guys like Warford will be around in the 2nd round. |
Best Guard to come out in a long time >>>>>>>> un proven LB in a 43 defence. If we ran, 34 I'd be all for it
_________________
^Delphi83^ (Sig)
<El Ramster.< (Avatar)
| norcalraider510 wrote: |
Rams front 4 is going to be amazing next year |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
STLRamsFan99
Joined: 17 Aug 2012
Posts: 863
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2013 12:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Jonezy wrote: | | STLRamsFan99 wrote: | | Jonezy wrote: | | You should change the title to "Who would you take at 16 if Chance is gone?" He is a no brainier at 16 |
I disagree, Jones at 16 is the easy pick for me. At this point no way he slips unless for some reason the medical evaluations at the combine.
Playmaking LB prospect > guard propsect in my opinion.
Johnson and other options could be available with our second 1st round pick. Plus guys like Warford will be around in the 2nd round. |
Best Guard to come out in a long time >>>>>>>> un proven LB in a 43 defence. If we ran, 34 I'd be all for it |
I really like Warmack but he still is a guard and in my opinion there is positional value. Good guards are easier to find than a play-making LBer later in the draft. Both are unproven in the NFL, he can cover, blitz, and play the run which is what is needed at WLB in 43 defense. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jonezy
Joined: 14 Dec 2009
Posts: 2992
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2013 12:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| STLRamsFan99 wrote: | | Jonezy wrote: | | STLRamsFan99 wrote: | | Jonezy wrote: | | You should change the title to "Who would you take at 16 if Chance is gone?" He is a no brainier at 16 |
I disagree, Jones at 16 is the easy pick for me. At this point no way he slips unless for some reason the medical evaluations at the combine.
Playmaking LB prospect > guard propsect in my opinion.
Johnson and other options could be available with our second 1st round pick. Plus guys like Warford will be around in the 2nd round. |
Best Guard to come out in a long time >>>>>>>> un proven LB in a 43 defence. If we ran, 34 I'd be all for it |
I really like Warmack but he still is a guard and in my opinion there is positional value. Good guards are easier to find than a play-making LBer later in the draft. Both are unproven in the NFL, he can cover, blitz, and play the run which is what is needed at WLB in 43 defense. |
I'm not going to put up to much of an argument against him because it wouldn't be horrible. But our offence needs Chance Warmack. Our defence doesn't need Jarvis Jones[/b]
_________________
^Delphi83^ (Sig)
<El Ramster.< (Avatar)
| norcalraider510 wrote: |
Rams front 4 is going to be amazing next year |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Flatlyner
Joined: 06 Feb 2006
Posts: 4510
Location: WESTCOAST
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2013 12:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
I took Jones. Can't pass on a talent like that at 16. Warford/Long/Fluker all options later for OLine.
Seriously doubt Jones is there, however, and, if he is, it would likely be due to his spine condition, in which case I would take Warmack.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jjab360
Joined: 31 Dec 2008
Posts: 3366
Location: On Top
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2013 2:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
No way the Rams would pick Chance over Jarvis Jones. Chance is a nice OG prospect and would be a nice piece to the puzzle, but he'll never have the potential to take over a game like Jones could. That's where positional value comes into play. Taking both of these guys' ceilings into mind, would you rather have Von Miller or Carl Nicks?
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
S-jax39
Joined: 23 Aug 2010
Posts: 5659
Location: [D]MV
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2013 3:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| jjab360 wrote: | | No way the Rams would pick Chance over Jarvis Jones. Chance is a nice OG prospect and would be a nice piece to the puzzle, but he'll never have the potential to take over a game like Jones could. That's where positional value comes into play. Taking both of these guys' ceilings into mind, would you rather have Von Miller or Carl Nicks? |
If miller is only playing for 4-6 years and Nicks is playing for 10+, id rather have nicks.
_________________
| SwiftTexan wrote: | | Chris Long has not been a difference maker on defense.......Chris Long is an above average starter and nothing more. |
#Yeezus |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jonezy
Joined: 14 Dec 2009
Posts: 2992
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2013 10:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Rather Nicks TBH that also means a more confident Sam
_________________
^Delphi83^ (Sig)
<El Ramster.< (Avatar)
| norcalraider510 wrote: |
Rams front 4 is going to be amazing next year |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
StLunatic88
Joined: 10 Jan 2006
Posts: 7227
Location: How good is your Good?
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2013 10:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| jjab360 wrote: | | No way the Rams would pick Chance over Jarvis Jones. Chance is a nice OG prospect and would be a nice piece to the puzzle, but he'll never have the potential to take over a game like Jones could. That's where positional value comes into play. Taking both of these guys' ceilings into mind, would you rather have Von Miller or Carl Nicks? |
If we are at the top of the draft, then sure, no question. But if Jarvis has fallen all the way to 16, then the Spinal Stenosis is a real concern, and then I would pass on him.
For the record, I dont think its as big of a deal as most around here want to make it. I think they just use it as an excuse to pass on him just because they dont want their team drafting an OLB very high. But the only way Jarvis Jones is anywhere near #16 is because the medical is a real concern for all these teams. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
The J.R.S.
Joined: 15 Feb 2007
Posts: 2776
Location: Next to Waldo
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2013 3:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Jonezy wrote: | | STLRamsFan99 wrote: | | Jonezy wrote: | | You should change the title to "Who would you take at 16 if Chance is gone?" He is a no brainier at 16 |
I disagree, Jones at 16 is the easy pick for me. At this point no way he slips unless for some reason the medical evaluations at the combine.
Playmaking LB prospect > guard propsect in my opinion.
Johnson and other options could be available with our second 1st round pick. Plus guys like Warford will be around in the 2nd round. |
Best Guard to come out in a long time >>>>>>>> un proven LB in a 43 defence. If we ran, 34 I'd be all for it |
Unproven? What has Warmack proved that Jones hasn't?
_________________
Real sports fans do not condone ESPN. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BEASToftheEAST4
Joined: 01 Nov 2007
Posts: 2627
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2013 1:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
I agree with Lunatic; if Jones falls to 16 then it's because he isn't cleared to play or teams aren't confident in him. Because if he is cleared to play, then he is a lock for a top 10 pick if not top 5.
and honestly, I think Warmack and Jones are close as far as prospects go and OG is much more a need than OLB is
_________________
^El Ramster^
If you're into hardcore/metal, check out my band: Portrait of a Prophecy
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Portrait-of-a-Prophecy/118264468260007 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jrry32
Joined: 04 Jan 2011
Posts: 31502
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2013 1:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Depends on what our Doctors say about Jones.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
