| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Phire
Joined: 12 Jan 2007
Posts: 39194
Location: #championchip 2012 HoF
|
 Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2013 8:10 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| RainbowCarebear wrote: | | Just admit you don't want to spend another christmas present on an Eagles Jersey. |
I think he adequately professed his love for Nick by getting a Foles jersey in the first place.
Actions speak louder than words.
_________________
 | theuntouchable wrote: | | Think about this phire. I am the real chow. |
| stevec0008 wrote: | | I read all the time, and laugh, a lot. Mostly at oland. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hammertime52
Joined: 15 Jan 2012
Posts: 5085
Location: South Jersey
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2013 8:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Phire wrote: | | RainbowCarebear wrote: | | Just admit you don't want to spend another christmas present on an Eagles Jersey. |
I think he adequately professed his love for Nick by getting a Foles jersey in the first place.
Actions speak louder than words. |
You guys are sharp as nails
_________________
Bird Watch: Brent Celek
Catches: 41 Yards: 509 TDs: 1 EPIC Hurdles: 1 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Withmy89vision
Joined: 07 Aug 2007
Posts: 2716
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2013 9:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
If we can get a third or better, thando it. Otherwise keep him for now. Then I say we get Seneca Wallace or better yet David Garrard. This gives us two mobile vets and a former Duck who fit Chip's offense.
Then with all our early picks and maybe a free agent or two we build a foundation. Then maybe we can draft a project fourth round and on at QB to compete, and if none of the four options work we will have an earlier pick and a better team for next year's guy.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
birdman0069
Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Posts: 6049
Location: Key West, FL
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2013 10:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Withmy89vision wrote: | If we can get a third or better, thando it. Otherwise keep him for now. Then I say we get Seneca Wallace or better yet David Garrard. This gives us two mobile vets and a former Duck who fit Chip's offense.
Then with all our early picks and maybe a free agent or two we build a foundation. Then maybe we can draft a project fourth round and on at QB to compete, and if none of the four options work we will have an earlier pick and a better team for next year's guy. |
When the organization starts drafting the same position in back to back to back years, other positions get overlooked. If they decide to go with any combination of QBs that doesn't include Foles, I still wouldn't draft one this year.
_________________
Props to Eagles _808 on the sig.
PE, the new poster child for birth control.
Birdman, slowest to 10K |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BBIB
Joined: 20 Jan 2008
Posts: 7411
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 23, 2013 1:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
By all accounts it doesn't seem like the Eagles are willing to consider parting ways with Nick Foles
Unless Andy Reid was willing to send the 33rd overall pick in the draft, then the Eagles would be insane not to jump on that
But I'm thinking the Chiefs won't make that offer. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Nabbs4u
Joined: 28 Jul 2007
Posts: 19185
Location: Carolina Kiltman on the Sig
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 23, 2013 2:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| BBIB wrote: | By all accounts it doesn't seem like the Eagles are willing to consider parting ways with Nick Foles
Unless Andy Reid was willing to send the 33rd overall pick in the draft, then the Eagles would be insane not to jump on that
But I'm thinking the Chiefs won't make that offer. |
I agree. Without that kind of value it makes no sense to trade Nick regardless of what people "assume" Chip will do in the NFL with his offense. If Michelle Shannahan can make Kirk Cousins look adequate/dominate running a variation of the offense RGIII ran all season before he was injured. Surely Chip Kelly is innovative enough to do the same around Foles either as a injury replacement or full time starter.
_________________
Bird Watch: LeSean McCoy
GM. 12^ Att. 200^ Avg. 4.2^ Rush yds 840^ TD 2}{Rec 54^ Rec yds 373^ TD 3 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MaclinandMCcoy
Joined: 07 Apr 2010
Posts: 2648
Location: Columbia, SC GO COCKS!
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 23, 2013 4:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| oland11 wrote: | | RainbowCarebear wrote: | | Just admit you don't want to spend another christmas present on an Eagles Jersey. |
Can't go wrong with classics such as a 92, 99, 20 or 36. |
I have a kelly green 12 
_________________
| babyatemydingo wrote: |
I may have responded with sarcasm, but I attempted to do it as eloquently as possible. If I need to do it in crayon or finger paint let me know.
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kylecumberland
Joined: 04 Feb 2008
Posts: 1002
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 23, 2013 10:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| How good is Foles? haven't seen a lot of him. would he be a better option for KC than Alex Smith? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
bkb77
Joined: 14 Mar 2008
Posts: 1462
Location: Philly
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 23, 2013 10:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Anyone else think theres a shot that all this Foles trade talk is just a smoke screen to potential boost Vick's market value to trade him?
_________________
Props to Kiltman on the Sig
For All My Scouting Reports and More Please go to http://briansdraftguide.com/scouting-reports.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Kiltman
Joined: 25 Nov 2007
Posts: 11018
Location: Flipadelphia
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 23, 2013 10:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| kylecumberland wrote: | | How good is Foles? haven't seen a lot of him. would he be a better option for KC than Alex Smith? |
Next year? Probably not
Long term? He has much more upside
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Nabbs4u
Joined: 28 Jul 2007
Posts: 19185
Location: Carolina Kiltman on the Sig
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 23, 2013 11:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| bkb77 wrote: | | Anyone else think theres a shot that all this Foles trade talk is just a smoke screen to potential boost Vick's market value to trade him? |
Yes!
_________________
Bird Watch: LeSean McCoy
GM. 12^ Att. 200^ Avg. 4.2^ Rush yds 840^ TD 2}{Rec 54^ Rec yds 373^ TD 3 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Nabbs4u
Joined: 28 Jul 2007
Posts: 19185
Location: Carolina Kiltman on the Sig
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 23, 2013 11:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Kiltman wrote: | | kylecumberland wrote: | | How good is Foles? haven't seen a lot of him. would he be a better option for KC than Alex Smith? |
Next year? Probably not
Long term? He has much more upside |
Disagree wholeheartedly. Alex Smith might be the most overhyped QB I've seen in years. People continue to act like he is some stud when he's not. IMO it would be the complete opposite because unlike Smith there would not be a learning curve for Foles. Nick would instantly step in and run Andy Reids offense day one of mini.camps/OTA. Not every WCO has the same terminology, schemes and formations. I'd easily take Foles in KC over Smith any day of the week. Now if you are talking about both players playing for another club altogether you would be 100% correct. Just not with KC.
_________________
Bird Watch: LeSean McCoy
GM. 12^ Att. 200^ Avg. 4.2^ Rush yds 840^ TD 2}{Rec 54^ Rec yds 373^ TD 3 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Kiltman
Joined: 25 Nov 2007
Posts: 11018
Location: Flipadelphia
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 23, 2013 11:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Nabbs4u wrote: | | Kiltman wrote: | | kylecumberland wrote: | | How good is Foles? haven't seen a lot of him. would he be a better option for KC than Alex Smith? |
Next year? Probably not
Long term? He has much more upside |
Disagree wholeheartedly. Alex Smith might be the most overhyped QB I've seen in years. People continue to act like he is some stud when he's not. IMO it would be the complete opposite because unlike Smith there would not be a learning curve for Foles. Nick would instantly step in and run Andy Reids offense day one of mini.camps/OTA. Not every WCO has the same terminology, schemes and formations. I'd easily take Foles in KC over Smith any day of the week. Now if you are talking about both players playing for another club altogether you would be 100% correct. Just not with KC. |
Ha....I agree...why did I write that?
I wasn't thinking that part of it, was thinking about what Foles needs to work on and that they would be close to the same level with that next year most likely.
Shut up Nabbsy 
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Nabbs4u
Joined: 28 Jul 2007
Posts: 19185
Location: Carolina Kiltman on the Sig
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 23, 2013 11:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Kiltman wrote: | | Nabbs4u wrote: | | Kiltman wrote: | | kylecumberland wrote: | | How good is Foles? haven't seen a lot of him. would he be a better option for KC than Alex Smith? |
Next year? Probably not
Long term? He has much more upside |
Disagree wholeheartedly. Alex Smith might be the most overhyped QB I've seen in years. People continue to act like he is some stud when he's not. IMO it would be the complete opposite because unlike Smith there would not be a learning curve for Foles. Nick would instantly step in and run Andy Reids offense day one of mini.camps/OTA. Not every WCO has the same terminology, schemes and formations. I'd easily take Foles in KC over Smith any day of the week. Now if you are talking about both players playing for another club altogether you would be 100% correct. Just not with KC. |
Ha....I agree...why did I write that?
I wasn't thinking that part of it, was thinking about what Foles needs to work on and that they would be close to the same level with that next year most likely.
Shut up Nabbsy |
_________________
Bird Watch: LeSean McCoy
GM. 12^ Att. 200^ Avg. 4.2^ Rush yds 840^ TD 2}{Rec 54^ Rec yds 373^ TD 3 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Kiltman
Joined: 25 Nov 2007
Posts: 11018
Location: Flipadelphia
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 23, 2013 11:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Nabbs4u wrote: | | Kiltman wrote: | | Nabbs4u wrote: | | Kiltman wrote: | | kylecumberland wrote: | | How good is Foles? haven't seen a lot of him. would he be a better option for KC than Alex Smith? |
Next year? Probably not
Long term? He has much more upside |
Disagree wholeheartedly. Alex Smith might be the most overhyped QB I've seen in years. People continue to act like he is some stud when he's not. IMO it would be the complete opposite because unlike Smith there would not be a learning curve for Foles. Nick would instantly step in and run Andy Reids offense day one of mini.camps/OTA. Not every WCO has the same terminology, schemes and formations. I'd easily take Foles in KC over Smith any day of the week. Now if you are talking about both players playing for another club altogether you would be 100% correct. Just not with KC. |
Ha....I agree...why did I write that?
I wasn't thinking that part of it, was thinking about what Foles needs to work on and that they would be close to the same level with that next year most likely.
Shut up Nabbsy |
|
In my defense I opened it up to write it then before I did I let the dog in and got another beer....had to take time for something that profound haha
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
