Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

Daintrain28's Mock Offseason 2013v.15.0
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Green Bay Packers
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
daintrain28


FF Fanatic

Joined: 04 Feb 2005
Posts: 19661
Location: Bettendorf, Iowa
PostPosted: Sat Feb 02, 2013 11:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

spilltray wrote:
daintrain28 wrote:
spilltray wrote:
People spun the academic thing with Raji. His play on the field was high effort. I just don't see that with with Hankins. I agree on the upside, I just don't think you can write off the inconsistency I see. It's not just inconsistent effort, it's his up and down play also.

Collins had played CB though. That's at least also in the same ballpark. Also, for all his athletic ability, Collins smarts and instincts at S were never his strong point. His ball skills and range were amazing though and that made up for it

I think Williams was fine this year and the fact he even played in 2011 with that shoulder injury is impressive. The stupid "Slowpoke" nickname (he's not even slow) and alot of unnecessary hate has been piled on him. He was far from a weak point in 2012.

They got rid of Quinn Johnson because they didn't use him. He was on the gameday inactive list as often as on the active roster.

All those WRs we've been cranking out? Jennings, Nelson, and Cobb all 2nd round picks, Jones a 3rd. Sure, good returns, but high end talent as well.


~I trust our coaching staff with Hankins. To be honest, I have no idea if Hankins can develop. But there's no developing the talent, and again he has the possibility of being great more so than any other prospect at who will be there ar #26.
~Well, again, we have McMillian who could be a great option at S, but with Wilcox we can have a guy who could be one of the best in the game. If not, McMillian would be a fine option at the position. Having a quality, but developing player gives us the flexibility to take a risk on someone else who could be a perennial Pro Bowler.
~I dunno man, I wasn't too impressed with Williams this year, I'm ready for an upgrade.
~Quinn Johnson played extensively in short yardage situations. We put Kuhn as the ballcarrier and used Quinn Johnson as the lead blocker. We had a darn good running game for short yardage situations. That's what I am trying to recapture with a power FB. We are talking about the 6th round here, it's okay to have a ST guy whose a goaline specialist lead blocker.


Yeah not saying you are WRONG overall, it's just way more of a gamble than I like to take that many of. I see why they all COULD hit, but also why they could all miss. I'd prefer to balance some risks with some safe picks.


Fair enough!
_________________

Thanks packerbacker87 for the sig!
I Am Rodgers wrote:
We traded MD Jennings for Julius Peppers. TT DA WHITE WIZARD
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
ajhawk5047


Joined: 04 Jan 2007
Posts: 1218
PostPosted: Sun Feb 03, 2013 5:37 am    Post subject: Re: Daintrain28's Mock Offseason 2013v.15.0 Reply with quote

daintrain28 wrote:
ajhawk5047 wrote:
I don't understand the hype with hankins at all. Watch his tape. He's slow, doesn't seem overly athletic and rarely gets any push. I wouldn't touch him before the 3rd. I really don't see anything special with him.


Question What?!?!?!

Did you watch one bad game on him or something? The guy makes tackles all over the field. Look at the game against Cal. 10 tackles, 1 sack, ran down a WR on a screen. To say he's slow is silly. To say he gets pushed around is even more silly. He consistently beats double teams and usually uses a bull rush to do that.

Seriously, did you just watch a bad game? Cause honestly, that doesn't make a whole lotta sense.


I can't remember which games I watched of him (I want to say Notre Dame and Wisconsin?) he just didn't make much of an impact in those games. I'll have to take a look at the tape from the Cal game. Maybe I was too quick to judge him, but whatever I saw did not impress me at all.
_________________
Go Packers!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Hinkle


Joined: 28 Apr 2008
Posts: 594
PostPosted: Wed Feb 06, 2013 10:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

We're not tagging Jennings not going to happen. Would love to pick up Steven Jackson but that's not TT like. Would address the wide receiver position earlier other than that this mock actually is realistic.
_________________

Props to Uncle Buck for the sig.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
palmy50


Joined: 26 Nov 2006
Posts: 13908
PostPosted: Wed Feb 06, 2013 11:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well done dain! The slots are a bit off for me, but do feel you could pull that group. Bunch of kids in there with a TT feel also.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Green Bay Packers All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group