| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
DOCLEW 28
Joined: 10 Nov 2006
Posts: 10586
Location: East Oakland
|
 Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 1:27 pm Post subject: Jacoby Ford gets a raise in 2013 for what??? |
 |
|
|
| Quote: | Raiders | Jacoby Ford gets increase in base salary in 2013
Thu, 31 Jan 2013 12:33:13 -0800
Oakland Raiders WR Jacoby Ford will receive an increase in his base salary in 2013 because of incentives in his contract. Ford will go from $630,000 to $1.323 million. |
This was reported by KFFL.com. I would have to say "for what"? The guy was hurt for the better part of the year and he gets a bump in salary because he reached incentives? I would like to know what incentives he could have possibly reached while on IR. That sounds like a bad clause written into that contract.
_________________
Raider X hooked me with the sig |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bo_Spice
Joined: 17 May 2009
Posts: 7076
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 1:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
The least dropped passes of any receiver on our roster maybe? 
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
NCOUGHMAN
Joined: 25 Mar 2008
Posts: 12572
Location: Stockton via East Palo Alto
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 1:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
did he get the chaz scholarship award
_________________
| green24 wrote: | | NCOUGHMAN >>>>>> all of you |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
oakdb36
Joined: 02 Mar 2006
Posts: 12723
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 1:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Obviously because he had already reached it in his first 2 years.
_________________
| Plush wrote: | | Papa was a trolling stone |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ZoomWaffle
Joined: 25 Apr 2010
Posts: 4567
Location: AZ
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 1:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Bo_Spice wrote: | | The least dropped passes of any receiver on our roster maybe? |
LOL
Maybe he just had to reach incentives in any year of his contract in order to get a raise? Or maybe he did something his rookie year, last year, or in both years combined? IDK, if not then I am confused.
_________________
Silver&Black88 on the sig
| La_Vader wrote: | | I wouldn't trade Pryor for any prospect in this years draft. Quote me on that |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Nodisrespect
Joined: 28 Nov 2009
Posts: 2908
Location: in the present
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 1:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Maybe because he clearly outperformed his 4th round contract as a rookie. It's 600k which is not much for a football player. and hopefully he comes out and plays well this year because we need him as a returner and at receiver |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pHaT_dEsI
Joined: 11 Sep 2007
Posts: 782
Location: Yoc-Town
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 2:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Maybe it's because he reached the 4th year of his rookie contract without being cut?
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Darkness
Joined: 24 Jun 2012
Posts: 4154
Location: CA-TX
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 2:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| oakdb36 wrote: | | Obviously because he had already reached it in his first 2 years. |
This...
_________________
El ramster made the sig!
| candyman93 wrote: | | Reading Darkness posts you'd think the warriors were playoff contenders |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
NCOUGHMAN
Joined: 25 Mar 2008
Posts: 12572
Location: Stockton via East Palo Alto
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 2:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Darkness wrote: | | oakdb36 wrote: | | Obviously because he had already reached it in his first 2 years. |
This... |
im curious to know what were his incentives ?
_________________
| green24 wrote: | | NCOUGHMAN >>>>>> all of you |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
lilcrazycat1
Joined: 09 Sep 2008
Posts: 899
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 2:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| NCOUGHMAN wrote: | | Darkness wrote: | | oakdb36 wrote: | | Obviously because he had already reached it in his first 2 years. |
This... |
im curious to know what were his incentives ? |
start 16 games in a season... oh wait nvm |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
bitty
Joined: 19 Jan 2005
Posts: 2985
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 4:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| NCOUGHMAN wrote: | | Darkness wrote: | | oakdb36 wrote: | | Obviously because he had already reached it in his first 2 years. |
This... |
im curious to know what were his incentives ? |
Probably special-teams TDs
That's the only thing I could think of. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
big_palooka
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 19022
Location: ATL
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 5:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| bitty wrote: | | NCOUGHMAN wrote: | | Darkness wrote: | | oakdb36 wrote: | | Obviously because he had already reached it in his first 2 years. |
This... |
im curious to know what were his incentives ? |
Probably special-teams TDs
That's the only thing I could think of. |
Surely receptions, yardage, TDs, etc. When he's played, he's played better than his 4th round grade would indicate.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RaiderX
Joined: 04 Jan 2007
Posts: 17086
Location: Crown Town, CA
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 8:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| big_palooka wrote: | | bitty wrote: | | NCOUGHMAN wrote: | | Darkness wrote: | | oakdb36 wrote: | | Obviously because he had already reached it in his first 2 years. |
This... |
im curious to know what were his incentives ? |
Probably special-teams TDs
That's the only thing I could think of. |
Surely receptions, yardage, TDs, etc. When he's played, he's played better than his 4th round grade would indicate. |
+1. It seems like people forgot. I also told everybody not to get too excited after the good year he had when many called him our #1.
Would have been a big help over the middle. Streater is an outside receiver who played slot. If Palmer had thrown a cleaner pass in SD on TNF the fool problems wouldn't have started.
_________________
| SaveourSonics wrote: | | Yea, RaiderX wins. We can all just top acting like this is a matter of opinion. MY GOD. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Nodisrespect
Joined: 28 Nov 2009
Posts: 2908
Location: in the present
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2013 1:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| RaiderX wrote: | | big_palooka wrote: | | bitty wrote: | | NCOUGHMAN wrote: | | Darkness wrote: | | oakdb36 wrote: | | Obviously because he had already reached it in his first 2 years. |
This... |
im curious to know what were his incentives ? |
Probably special-teams TDs
That's the only thing I could think of. |
Surely receptions, yardage, TDs, etc. When he's played, he's played better than his 4th round grade would indicate. |
+1. It seems like people forgot. I also told everybody not to get too excited after the good year he had when many called him our #1.
Would have been a big help over the middle. Streater is an outside receiver who played slot. If Palmer had thrown a cleaner pass in SD on TNF the fool problems wouldn't have started. |
And the preseason air balls didn't help either. But your right the underthrown ball started all this(even though some speculate it was JC leaving), but it's not all Palmers fault ford is built like a sprinter. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jamethus92
Joined: 03 Mar 2007
Posts: 4493
Location: Colorado Springs
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2013 4:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| RaiderX wrote: | | Would have been a big help over the middle. Streater is an outside receiver who played slot. If Palmer had thrown a cleaner pass in SD on TNF the fool problems wouldn't have started. |
Hard to blame Palmer for Ford getting yet another injury. But I think you do have a point in that Palmer will really hang his receivers out to dry sometimes.
_________________
Kiltman on the new sig |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
