Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

Jacoby Ford gets a raise in 2013 for what???
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Oakland Raiders
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
DOCLEW 28


Joined: 10 Nov 2006
Posts: 10890
Location: East Oakland
PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 1:27 pm    Post subject: Jacoby Ford gets a raise in 2013 for what??? Reply with quote

Quote:
Raiders | Jacoby Ford gets increase in base salary in 2013
Thu, 31 Jan 2013 12:33:13 -0800

Oakland Raiders WR Jacoby Ford will receive an increase in his base salary in 2013 because of incentives in his contract. Ford will go from $630,000 to $1.323 million.



This was reported by KFFL.com. I would have to say "for what"? The guy was hurt for the better part of the year and he gets a bump in salary because he reached incentives? I would like to know what incentives he could have possibly reached while on IR. That sounds like a bad clause written into that contract.
_________________

Raider X hooked me with the sig
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bo_Spice


Joined: 17 May 2009
Posts: 9687
PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 1:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The least dropped passes of any receiver on our roster maybe? Laughing
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NCOUGHMAN


Joined: 25 Mar 2008
Posts: 14801
Location: Stockton via East Palo Alto
PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 1:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

did he get the chaz scholarship award
_________________


green24 wrote:
NCOUGHMAN > all of you


Raider X wrote:
This is football, not pussology 101
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
oakdb36


Joined: 02 Mar 2006
Posts: 14189
PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 1:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Obviously because he had already reached it in his first 2 years.
_________________
Plush wrote:
Papa was a trolling stone
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ZoomWaffle


Joined: 25 Apr 2010
Posts: 5362
Location: United Kingdom
PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 1:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bo_Spice wrote:
The least dropped passes of any receiver on our roster maybe? Laughing


LOL

Maybe he just had to reach incentives in any year of his contract in order to get a raise? Or maybe he did something his rookie year, last year, or in both years combined? IDK, if not then I am confused.
_________________


Silver&Black88 on the sig

La_Vader wrote:
I wouldn't trade Pryor for any prospect in this years draft. Quote me on that
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Nodisrespect


Joined: 28 Nov 2009
Posts: 3772
Location: in the present
PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 1:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Maybe because he clearly outperformed his 4th round contract as a rookie. It's 600k which is not much for a football player. and hopefully he comes out and plays well this year because we need him as a returner and at receiver
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pHaT_dEsI


Joined: 11 Sep 2007
Posts: 782
Location: Yoc-Town
PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 2:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Maybe it's because he reached the 4th year of his rookie contract without being cut?
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Darkness


Joined: 24 Jun 2012
Posts: 7348
Location: CA
PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 2:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

oakdb36 wrote:
Obviously because he had already reached it in his first 2 years.


This...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NCOUGHMAN


Joined: 25 Mar 2008
Posts: 14801
Location: Stockton via East Palo Alto
PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 2:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Darkness wrote:
oakdb36 wrote:
Obviously because he had already reached it in his first 2 years.


This...


im curious to know what were his incentives ?
_________________


green24 wrote:
NCOUGHMAN > all of you


Raider X wrote:
This is football, not pussology 101
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lilcrazycat1


Joined: 09 Sep 2008
Posts: 930
PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 2:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

NCOUGHMAN wrote:
Darkness wrote:
oakdb36 wrote:
Obviously because he had already reached it in his first 2 years.


This...


im curious to know what were his incentives ?


start 16 games in a season... oh wait nvm
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
bitty


Joined: 19 Jan 2005
Posts: 3640
PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 4:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

NCOUGHMAN wrote:
Darkness wrote:
oakdb36 wrote:
Obviously because he had already reached it in his first 2 years.


This...


im curious to know what were his incentives ?


Probably special-teams TDs
That's the only thing I could think of.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
big_palooka


Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 22425
Location: ATL
PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 5:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

bitty wrote:
NCOUGHMAN wrote:
Darkness wrote:
oakdb36 wrote:
Obviously because he had already reached it in his first 2 years.


This...


im curious to know what were his incentives ?


Probably special-teams TDs
That's the only thing I could think of.


Surely receptions, yardage, TDs, etc. When he's played, he's played better than his 4th round grade would indicate.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RaiderX


Joined: 04 Jan 2007
Posts: 20443
Location: Crown Town, CA
PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 8:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

big_palooka wrote:
bitty wrote:
NCOUGHMAN wrote:
Darkness wrote:
oakdb36 wrote:
Obviously because he had already reached it in his first 2 years.


This...


im curious to know what were his incentives ?


Probably special-teams TDs
That's the only thing I could think of.


Surely receptions, yardage, TDs, etc. When he's played, he's played better than his 4th round grade would indicate.


+1. It seems like people forgot. I also told everybody not to get too excited after the good year he had when many called him our #1.

Would have been a big help over the middle. Streater is an outside receiver who played slot. If Palmer had thrown a cleaner pass in SD on TNF the fool problems wouldn't have started.
_________________

SaveourSonics wrote:
Yea, RaiderX wins. We can all just top acting like this is a matter of opinion. MY GOD.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Nodisrespect


Joined: 28 Nov 2009
Posts: 3772
Location: in the present
PostPosted: Sat Feb 02, 2013 1:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

RaiderX wrote:
big_palooka wrote:
bitty wrote:
NCOUGHMAN wrote:
Darkness wrote:
oakdb36 wrote:
Obviously because he had already reached it in his first 2 years.


This...


im curious to know what were his incentives ?


Probably special-teams TDs
That's the only thing I could think of.


Surely receptions, yardage, TDs, etc. When he's played, he's played better than his 4th round grade would indicate.


+1. It seems like people forgot. I also told everybody not to get too excited after the good year he had when many called him our #1.

Would have been a big help over the middle. Streater is an outside receiver who played slot. If Palmer had thrown a cleaner pass in SD on TNF the fool problems wouldn't have started.
And the preseason air balls didn't help either. But your right the underthrown ball started all this(even though some speculate it was JC leaving), but it's not all Palmers fault ford is built like a sprinter.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jamethus92


Joined: 03 Mar 2007
Posts: 4967
Location: Colorado Springs
PostPosted: Sat Feb 02, 2013 4:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

RaiderX wrote:
Would have been a big help over the middle. Streater is an outside receiver who played slot. If Palmer had thrown a cleaner pass in SD on TNF the fool problems wouldn't have started.


Hard to blame Palmer for Ford getting yet another injury. But I think you do have a point in that Palmer will really hang his receivers out to dry sometimes.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Oakland Raiders All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group