| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
buno67 
Joined: 15 Mar 2007 Posts: 23963 Location: Chubs for Chud
|
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 8:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| pnies20 wrote: | | Just because Moore would be gone (not including Werner because he's not a viable option at 6 right now) doesn't mean we would have to take the next best OLB. Take a corner. Take the BPA. I don't care who it is... Besides a left tackle I guess lol. |
I def could see someone falling to the browns at 6 that would make a great BPA for us _________________
XBL:buno67
PSN:mcolabuno |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
zelbell
Joined: 08 Feb 2010 Posts: 2933 Location: NW Ohio
|
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 8:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| buno67 wrote: | | pnies20 wrote: | | Just because Moore would be gone (not including Werner because he's not a viable option at 6 right now) doesn't mean we would have to take the next best OLB. Take a corner. Take the BPA. I don't care who it is... Besides a left tackle I guess lol. |
I def could see someone falling to the browns at 6 that would make a great BPA for us |
If Geno goes in the top 5 we will get one of Jones, Star, Milliner, or Moore IMO |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
buckeye00
Joined: 04 Nov 2012 Posts: 102
|
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 9:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
The scheme at LSU this year also required him to play contain a lot of the time instead of straight out rushing the passer, which was quite possibly a large reason for his lack of sacks. If you go back and watch some 2011 tape he shows great bend, surprising power for his frame and quick strong hands but bad technique.
The problem with the Browns picking him is that he would not be able to contribute as much in the 4-3 part of the hybrid like Moore would be able to. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
buckeye00
Joined: 04 Nov 2012 Posts: 102
|
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 9:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| buckeye00 wrote: | The scheme at LSU this year also required him to play contain a lot of the time instead of straight out rushing the passer, which was quite possibly a large reason for his lack of sacks. If you go back and watch some 2011 tape he shows great bend, surprising power for his frame and quick strong hands but bad technique.
The problem with the Browns picking him is that he would not be able to contribute as much in the 4-3 part of the hybrid like Moore would be able to. |
Never mind the last part just saw the defense is going to be strictly a 34. I think that pushes Moore's value down a little, because there are a lot of good 34 rush linebackers, but not many could also put there hand on the ground for a 43. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dropkick_pride 
Joined: 18 Jan 2009 Posts: 9438 Location: C-bus
|
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 9:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| buckeye00 wrote: | | buckeye00 wrote: | The scheme at LSU this year also required him to play contain a lot of the time instead of straight out rushing the passer, which was quite possibly a large reason for his lack of sacks. If you go back and watch some 2011 tape he shows great bend, surprising power for his frame and quick strong hands but bad technique.
The problem with the Browns picking him is that he would not be able to contribute as much in the 4-3 part of the hybrid like Moore would be able to. |
Never mind the last part just saw the defense is going to be strictly a 34. I think that pushes Moore's value down a little, because there are a lot of good 34 rush linebackers, but not many could also put there hand on the ground for a 43. |
Mingo could very well be the best OLB prospect this year athletically...
I feel he is also a better fit for a rush 34 olb than the 43 de he played at LSU...
He is on my big board. _________________
| Thomas5737 wrote: | | EZ's acceptance of farting on nuns does not necessarily reflect the views of this sub forum. |
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bulldog 
 Joined: 18 Nov 2008 Posts: 4336 Location: Salem
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
buckeye00
Joined: 04 Nov 2012 Posts: 102
|
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 11:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Dropkick_pride wrote: | | buckeye00 wrote: | | buckeye00 wrote: | The scheme at LSU this year also required him to play contain a lot of the time instead of straight out rushing the passer, which was quite possibly a large reason for his lack of sacks. If you go back and watch some 2011 tape he shows great bend, surprising power for his frame and quick strong hands but bad technique.
The problem with the Browns picking him is that he would not be able to contribute as much in the 4-3 part of the hybrid like Moore would be able to. |
Never mind the last part just saw the defense is going to be strictly a 34. I think that pushes Moore's value down a little, because there are a lot of good 34 rush linebackers, but not many could also put there hand on the ground for a 43. |
Mingo could very well be the best OLB prospect this year athletically...
I feel he is also a better fit for a rush 34 olb than the 43 de he played at LSU...
He is on my big board. |
Agree with everything you said. Athletically the only guy who rivals him in my mind is Ansah and I'm not sure if he could play OLB since he has very tight hips and no bend. Mingo and Ansah should have the 2 highest explosive power numbers and then I would think Mingo would have 1 of the best twitch numbers.
In strictly a 34 rush linebacker position I like Mingo better than Moore. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pnies20
Joined: 19 Dec 2007 Posts: 6739 Location: Nashville through Erie, PA
|
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 11:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Mingo is my #2 OLB but there is a big gap and only in a trade down. _________________ Trent Richardson please!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DawgSoldier 
Joined: 30 Oct 2007 Posts: 5947 Location: Medina OH
|
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2013 2:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| pnies20 wrote: | | Mingo is my #2 OLB but there is a big gap and only in a trade down. | wonder what the combine will do to that stock? _________________ The Dawgpounds new three headed monster!
Adopt a Brown: QB Brandon Weeden
247/433 57% 2820yds 6.5avg 13 TD 15 Int |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|