| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
ViolentMonk71
Joined: 06 May 2005
Posts: 2521
Location: Don Shula's front porch
|
 Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2013 9:02 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
I vote no on both trades Soliei is worth more then an underachieving WR...and we are getting grifted on Hall...
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Emerica
Joined: 12 Nov 2011
Posts: 1061
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2013 9:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Can someone find a better deal for Soliai?
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ViolentMonk71
Joined: 06 May 2005
Posts: 2521
Location: Don Shula's front porch
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2013 9:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Emerica wrote: | | Can someone find a better deal for Soliai? |
Why are we dealing him other then for the sake of dealing him?
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Emerica
Joined: 12 Nov 2011
Posts: 1061
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2013 9:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| ViolentMonk71 wrote: | | Emerica wrote: | | Can someone find a better deal for Soliai? |
Why are we dealing him other then for the sake of dealing him? |
It's not trading for the sake of trading, we have 3 starting caliber DTs. Either we trade one and get a pick back or we let one leave and get nothing back. I've said time and time again in this thread, trade Soliai for a pick or a player that would fill one of our many holes and tag Starks who will replace Soliai and be cheaper.
If you don't understand why we'd trade Soliai now then I can't help you.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jaytotha
Joined: 27 Jan 2008
Posts: 3286
Location: Spokane Valley, Wa
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2013 9:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Emerica wrote: | | Can someone find a better deal for Soliai? |
might have something
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ViolentMonk71
Joined: 06 May 2005
Posts: 2521
Location: Don Shula's front porch
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2013 9:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Emerica wrote: | | ViolentMonk71 wrote: | | Emerica wrote: | | Can someone find a better deal for Soliai? |
Why are we dealing him other then for the sake of dealing him? |
It's not trading for the sake of trading, we have 3 starting caliber DTs. Either we trade one and get a pick back or we let one leave and get nothing back. I've said time and time again in this thread, trade Soliai for a pick or a player that would fill one of our many holes and tag Starks who will replace Soliai and be cheaper.
If you don't understand why we'd trade Soliai now then I can't help you. |
Still pointless trade....Starks plays the 3 and would struggle in the 1. Why not let Starks walk and sign a FA WR with the money saved. Its one thing to have odrick move to the 3 its another to think Starks can easily move to the 1.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jaytotha
Joined: 27 Jan 2008
Posts: 3286
Location: Spokane Valley, Wa
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2013 9:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| ViolentMonk71 wrote: | | Emerica wrote: | | ViolentMonk71 wrote: | | Emerica wrote: | | Can someone find a better deal for Soliai? |
Why are we dealing him other then for the sake of dealing him? |
It's not trading for the sake of trading, we have 3 starting caliber DTs. Either we trade one and get a pick back or we let one leave and get nothing back. I've said time and time again in this thread, trade Soliai for a pick or a player that would fill one of our many holes and tag Starks who will replace Soliai and be cheaper.
If you don't understand why we'd trade Soliai now then I can't help you. |
Still pointless trade....Starks plays the 3 and would struggle in the 1. Why not let Starks walk and sign a FA WR with the money saved. Its one thing to have odrick move to the 3 its another to think Starks can easily move to the 1. |
Theres not much in FA for WR that are upgrades imo
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Emerica
Joined: 12 Nov 2011
Posts: 1061
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2013 9:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Jaytotha wrote: | | ViolentMonk71 wrote: | | Emerica wrote: | | ViolentMonk71 wrote: | | Emerica wrote: | | Can someone find a better deal for Soliai? |
Why are we dealing him other then for the sake of dealing him? |
It's not trading for the sake of trading, we have 3 starting caliber DTs. Either we trade one and get a pick back or we let one leave and get nothing back. I've said time and time again in this thread, trade Soliai for a pick or a player that would fill one of our many holes and tag Starks who will replace Soliai and be cheaper.
If you don't understand why we'd trade Soliai now then I can't help you. |
Still pointless trade....Starks plays the 3 and would struggle in the 1. Why not let Starks walk and sign a FA WR with the money saved. Its one thing to have odrick move to the 3 its another to think Starks can easily move to the 1. |
Theres not much in FA for WR that are upgrades imo |
And the 1 or 2 who are upgrades are going to be heavily sought after and it's going to end in a bidding war.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ViolentMonk71
Joined: 06 May 2005
Posts: 2521
Location: Don Shula's front porch
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2013 9:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Jaytotha wrote: | | ViolentMonk71 wrote: | | Emerica wrote: | | ViolentMonk71 wrote: | | Emerica wrote: | | Can someone find a better deal for Soliai? |
Why are we dealing him other then for the sake of dealing him? |
It's not trading for the sake of trading, we have 3 starting caliber DTs. Either we trade one and get a pick back or we let one leave and get nothing back. I've said time and time again in this thread, trade Soliai for a pick or a player that would fill one of our many holes and tag Starks who will replace Soliai and be cheaper.
If you don't understand why we'd trade Soliai now then I can't help you. |
Still pointless trade....Starks plays the 3 and would struggle in the 1. Why not let Starks walk and sign a FA WR with the money saved. Its one thing to have odrick move to the 3 its another to think Starks can easily move to the 1. |
Theres not much in FA for WR that are upgrades imo |
Then draft.one…but don't trade a 355 one tech and expect a 305 three tech to move over the centrr and be as effective. Soliei was more important to run defense then Staraks was.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jaytotha
Joined: 27 Jan 2008
Posts: 3286
Location: Spokane Valley, Wa
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2013 9:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| ViolentMonk71 wrote: | | Jaytotha wrote: | | ViolentMonk71 wrote: | | Emerica wrote: | | ViolentMonk71 wrote: | | Emerica wrote: | | Can someone find a better deal for Soliai? |
Why are we dealing him other then for the sake of dealing him? |
It's not trading for the sake of trading, we have 3 starting caliber DTs. Either we trade one and get a pick back or we let one leave and get nothing back. I've said time and time again in this thread, trade Soliai for a pick or a player that would fill one of our many holes and tag Starks who will replace Soliai and be cheaper.
If you don't understand why we'd trade Soliai now then I can't help you. |
Still pointless trade....Starks plays the 3 and would struggle in the 1. Why not let Starks walk and sign a FA WR with the money saved. Its one thing to have odrick move to the 3 its another to think Starks can easily move to the 1. |
Theres not much in FA for WR that are upgrades imo |
Then draft.one…but don't trade a 355 one tech and expect a 305 three tech to move over the centrr and be as effective. Soliei was more important to run defense then Staraks was. |
We finished 20th against the run.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jaytotha
Joined: 27 Jan 2008
Posts: 3286
Location: Spokane Valley, Wa
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2013 9:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Have some more fillers going out. The saints might be interested but they said if a 2nd was involved for Colston
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ViolentMonk71
Joined: 06 May 2005
Posts: 2521
Location: Don Shula's front porch
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2013 9:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
And we will be worse if we move Soliei and think Starks will hold down the middle
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Emerica
Joined: 12 Nov 2011
Posts: 1061
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2013 9:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Jaytotha wrote: | | Have some more fillers going out. The saints might be interested but they said if a 2nd was involved for Colston |
Soliai AND a 2nd for Colston?
Damn New Orleans cracks me up. 
| ViolentMonk71 wrote: | | And we will be worse if we move Soliei and think Starks will hold down the middle |
*You think* we'd be worse. We don't know that.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
WaterBear56
Joined: 26 Jul 2010
Posts: 2878
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2013 10:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Starks is just as capable of holding the line as Soliai is plus he has the added bonus of being a great interior pass rusher. If we can trade Soliai then we should tag Starks. If not, then I'm fine with Soliai.
_________________
ADOPT A DOLPHIN: CAMERON WAKE
2012 STATISTICS: 53 TACK, 38 SOLO, 15 AST, 15 SACK, 3 FF, 1 PD, 3 STF |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Emerica
Joined: 12 Nov 2011
Posts: 1061
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2013 10:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| WaterBear56 wrote: | | Starks is just as capable of holding the line as Soliai is plus he has the added bonus of being a great interior pass rusher. If we can trade Soliai then we should tag Starks. If not, then I'm fine with Soliai. |
Time is going to be a factor now with the deadline to tag tomorrow.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
