Revis to Seattle?

chpjns15 · Joined: 21 Dec 2009 Posts: 1568

They are in need of a QB.

Maybe Browner + Flynn + late round pick?

I would feel like Very Happy

if that happened!
_________________
"Trying is the first step towards failure"

"If you can't win, cheat. If you can't cheat, don't play."

"Getting a paper cut, that is tragedy. Someone falling down a sewer and dying, that is comedy."

Bigjoe0075 · Joined: 18 Nov 2009 Posts: 1891 Location: Eastern Washinton

Its not going to happen. I'd be shocked if Pete and John pull the trigger.
1)He's expensive.
2) He's a me type guy and
3) He's coming of major knee injury
4) Our FO has a pride in finding guys for themselves.

Look Revis is an amazing CB when healthy. But this trade would have to be worked out to benefit Seattle. We are in great shape in the secondary so this is 100% luxury move. Personally I would give a 3rd this year. If Revis is a team player and healthy they get a 2nd next year.

PS they won't want Flynn. They are trying to save money. Sanchez is looking at 12 million (100% guarenteed) They will probably stick with him this year. They don't want to add another 7 million at QB.

bobob123 · Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2013 10:14 pm Post subject:

No.
Nope.
Noway.
Nohow.

I would be 100% against this trade, here's why:

1) The trade would cost too much.
2) After the trade Revis will want big $.
3) Revis is going to be 28 years old at the start of next year and coming off of an ACL tear.
4) We have two very good Corners in Sherm and Browner to start with.
5) as stated earlier in this thread, we need pass rushers on this team our CBs are solid......
_________________
....

"Guess what! I got a fever, and the only prescription, is MORE COWBELL!!" - Christopher Walken

silus · Joined: 09 Aug 2007 Posts: 1436

Brown_Mamba · Joined: 13 May 2008 Posts: 1404 Location: Seattle

I'm against this trade, but if it went down, I wouldn't even be mad. Why would any team not want the 2 best corners in the league? that helps your pass rush SO much.
_________________

Dirk No-Miss-zki & DangeRuss Wilson fan.

TheoryofSeahawk · Joined: 25 Feb 2008 Posts: 1826 Location: Kosmic Satori

I'm against this trade as well. Revis has proven himself to be a selfish, me-first player as well as a off-the-field distraction with his seemingly yearly threat of holding out. I'm all for players getting what they can out of the contract negotiation process, but this dude acts like a diva every off season. The 'Hawks don't need that kind of distraction. Save the picks cuz the FO has already proven they can find gems at any time in the draft and save the cap space to sign other quality players that hopefully won't act like honey boo boo after every season. Rolling Eyes

_________________
“They were threatened by my intelligence and too stupid to know that’s why they hated me.”

Sheldon Cooper

SaveourSonics · Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2013 3:21 pm Post subject:

SwiftTexan pretty much covered everything I was going to say. No thanks to Revis.
_________________

'
Richard D!ck Sherman 4 Prez

SwiftTexan · Joined: 15 Feb 2011 Posts: 2441

There's a rumour going around that Cromartie may be more likely to be dealt. This actually makes more sense (for us anyway). He's a big tall receiver with great hands and he wouldn't cost as much to acquire. He's also signed for the next two years. The only drawback is that he has a hefty contract for the next two years but maybe we could convince him to re-structure to a longer term in the hopes of making a deep playoff run.

I don't think we need to acquire either of these big names floating around the trade block but I'm sure John & co are doing their due dilligence and seeing what the price tag is.
_________________
GO SEAHAWKS GO!
Not a Texans fan...just a nickname.
April 7th, 2013

Tatupu_64 · Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2013 3:52 pm Post subject:

I see no purpose to Cro.

He's purely an outside CB, just like Browner and Sherman. The bonus to Revis is that he can cover elite slot guys.
_________________

Props to the Ramster
Seattle's Original Bruce Irvin Supporter
ET and Mebane's Biggest Supporter

FFMD2 13 GM

SwiftTexan · Joined: 15 Feb 2011 Posts: 2441

sirensong · Joined: 13 Mar 2007 Posts: 716 Location: Vancouver BC

C-Hawkin' · Joined: 30 Aug 2011 Posts: 234 Location: olympia, wa

I Agree with "NO!" to Revis for all the reasons elucidated above. Focus on what we need- OL, Pass rush, WR, depth. If you're gonna go for a big name FA, go get a guard. There won't be any super-studs available to us in the draft.
_________________
"We have met the enemy & he is us."- Pogo

imani · Joined: 03 Mar 2009 Posts: 21911 Location: Harlem, NY

Sacks98 · Joined: 21 Dec 2009 Posts: 3520

Revis wants star QB money and what we would have to give up would not be worth it, Our D-Line needs the upgrade our Secondary is fine except at NCB.

Tatupu_64 · Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2013 10:02 pm Post subject: