| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Dropkick_pride
Joined: 18 Jan 2009
Posts: 9472
Location: C-bus
|
 Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2013 2:10 pm Post subject: Re: Boom or Bust Mock 2013 |
 |
|
|
| Winslow80 wrote: | | Butter273 wrote: | | Thoughts? Comments? Concerns?[/u] |
This is the best mock FA and draft I have seen. Great work! |
Nearly every contract listed is simply too small and some way too small, signing 30+ year old players to multi-years contracts is a fail even if you like their name, the GB trade is just odd, drafting a repeat drug offender, and being a bit lax with draft projections seems rather poor to me...
_________________
| Thomas5737 wrote: | | EZ's acceptance of farting on nuns does not necessarily reflect the views of this sub forum. |
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CleBrowns07
Joined: 12 Dec 2006
Posts: 4196
Location: Willoughby
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2013 6:47 pm Post subject: Re: Boom or Bust Mock 2013 |
|
|
|
| Dropkick_pride wrote: | | Winslow80 wrote: | | Butter273 wrote: | | Thoughts? Comments? Concerns?[/u] |
This is the best mock FA and draft I have seen. Great work! |
Nearly every contract listed is simply too small and some way too small, signing 30+ year old players to multi-years contracts is a fail even if you like their name, the GB trade is just odd, drafting a repeat drug offender, and being a bit lax with draft projections seems rather poor to me... |
Didn't Gordon blaze in college? As well as a ton of other NFL players? I'm not saying we should draft Tyran but if we did I wouldn't hold his past against him.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Butter273
Joined: 01 Mar 2008
Posts: 662
Location: Akron, OH
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2013 9:29 pm Post subject: Re: Boom or Bust Mock 2013 |
|
|
|
| Dropkick_pride wrote: | | Winslow80 wrote: | | Butter273 wrote: | | Thoughts? Comments? Concerns?[/u] |
This is the best mock FA and draft I have seen. Great work! |
Nearly every contract listed is simply too small and some way too small, signing 30+ year old players to multi-years contracts is a fail even if you like their name, the GB trade is just odd, drafting a repeat drug offender, and being a bit lax with draft projections seems rather poor to me... |
Contracts were based on 2012 signings by position. They may be on the low end but we have some money to spend.
AS for the 30 year old players...we have little to no veteran presence on our young team and the players listed still have much to give. I listen to every one complain year in and year out that we need to pass on Peppers, Woodson, and that when Ray Lewis was a free agent because they are too old. Get off it already...
Green Bay needs a back up to Rodgers like none other and McCoy would be a great fit in that system.
As for taking a risk on a 4th round pick? Roll the dice, you can't always play it safe. The kid can ball and if he get top 10 talent for that price you take the risk.
Thank you for your comments...
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
