| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Seattle's 3rd best player |
| Earl Thomas |
|
71% |
[ 20 ] |
| Russell Okung |
|
10% |
[ 3 ] |
| Brandon Mebane |
|
3% |
[ 1 ] |
| Russell WIlson |
|
10% |
[ 3 ] |
| Max Unger |
|
3% |
[ 1 ] |
| Chris Clemons |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| Sidney Rice |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| Zach Miller |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| Kam Chancellor |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| KJ Wright |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 28 |
|
| Author |
Message |
imani 
Joined: 03 Mar 2009 Posts: 21313 Location: Harlem, NY
|
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2013 2:06 am Post subject: Ranking the Roster 2013: Who's #3? |
|
|
|
**please read the instructions and information before you make your vote**
You guys should know the drill by now
But here are a few changes:
-I will stop accepting votes for this poll the following day of the OP date @ 11:59pm
-If you vote, PLEASE in turn post in thread 1) Who you voted for 2) Who you would like to be added to the next poll
-Thread is open to discussion about anything pertaining to the rankings. You may respectfully disagree with someone's selection, but please do not "bash" or criticize someone for making a selection. I would like each selection to be made purely off of opinion, no pressure
-If you are a fan of another team just dropping by, feel free to submit a vote or join the discussion. Outside perspective is always welcome
-I will keep this going until we 1) Complete a 30 man roster 2) or interest drops off to the point where the process loses its function, in which cases the amount will be rounded off. At the end i would like to get this stickied as the official 2013 Seahawk player rankings
1. Richard Sherman
2. Marshawn Lynch
3.
4.
5.
_________________
abdi7451 on the sig
| Cypher wrote: | | Erryday i'm Russelin'. |
Russell Wilson Fan since July 2012 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hawksman81 
Joined: 30 Mar 2009 Posts: 2329 Location: I am the Eyas
|
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2013 2:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Earl because of the freedom in defensive scheming he gives us. And he’s a great player. _________________
| SaveourSonics wrote: | | I love D!ck |
| JustisM wrote: | Why'd they turn the lights on?
Big Ben is more effective in the dark. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tooki 
Joined: 28 Apr 2009 Posts: 9523 Location: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
|
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2013 3:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
ET
The secondary can do what they do because of him. _________________
| sp6488 wrote: | | If the Chiefs finish ahead of the Ravens in the standings I will eat a printed copy of the standings. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SupeRG00F 
Joined: 12 Aug 2012 Posts: 972 Location: Vancouver, Wa
|
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2013 8:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
You guys are just going by the Madden ratings for the players huh..
I'm on to you.. _________________ Kam Chancellor-2012/2013 Season - 100 tackles - 1 FF - 2 FR - 0 INT
Xbox Gamertag: SupeR G00F |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dools=hawks 
Joined: 04 Mar 2008 Posts: 2422 Location: We didn't start the fire it was always burning since the worlds been turning
|
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2013 9:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| SupeRG00F wrote: | You guys are just going by the Madden ratings for the players huh..
I'm on to you.. |
marshawn is a 97 so he would be first then sherm at 94 the et at 93 then i think clem or okung at 91 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SupeRG00F 
Joined: 12 Aug 2012 Posts: 972 Location: Vancouver, Wa
|
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2013 9:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Dools=hawks wrote: | | SupeRG00F wrote: | You guys are just going by the Madden ratings for the players huh..
I'm on to you.. |
marshawn is a 97 so he would be first then sherm at 94 the et at 93 then i think clem or okung at 91 | Damn really? I didn't know Lynch was a 97. I thought he was a 93.
Thanks for bursting my bubble. _________________ Kam Chancellor-2012/2013 Season - 100 tackles - 1 FF - 2 FR - 0 INT
Xbox Gamertag: SupeR G00F |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|