matt79511
Joined: 10 Jul 2011
Posts: 4687
|
 Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2013 1:01 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| Nextyearfordaboyz wrote: | | matt79511 wrote: | | Would they really have taken Lee AND Bowman back-to-back? I find that a little hard to believe. |
Bowman was their #20 player on the board. At #90 he was far and away the top rated player the Cowboys had left. If that was the case, they better take him. |
Just felt like Lee was a luxury pick for a team questionable in other places (which obviously wasn't accurate but how I felt at the time), and Bowman would've been even more so. But yeah, can't pass on your #20 guy at #90.
I'm not a Jared Odrick fan, so I guess the key becomes the 2011 second rounder: who do they take instead of Bruce Carter? Off the top of my head the only other thing I remember them considering with that pick was a trade-up for Mark Ingram (Ew!).
| Football Mensa wrote: | | Let's take it a step further. If Lee can't play 16 games in 2013 would you resign him? I would not. He would cost too much for 6-8 games a year. |
Well, wouldn't health concerns drive his price down? I doubt he costs near as much as Bowman did. In fact, this is clearly a buy-low opportunity for Dallas- extend him now before he starts playing like an All-Pro again.
I do worry about his health, but 6-8 games a year? He played 14 as a rook and 15 as a soph (although he quite nearly had season ending wrist surgery). Each year, he's had one injury ranging in severity- ACL in college, hamstring in 2010, wrist in 2011 and foot in 2012. Not saying that he'll be able to avoid his yearly malady going forward, but he's not a Felix type that ends every game with a nick.
_________________
 |
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
